What is the incidence of tuberculosis in adults with chronic kidney disease (stages 3‑5) and in patients on maintenance dialysis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 10, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Incidence of Tuberculosis in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

Patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5 and those on maintenance dialysis face a dramatically elevated tuberculosis incidence of 126-4,200 cases per 100,000 patient-years, representing a 10- to 25-fold increased risk compared to the general population. 1

Stage-Specific Incidence Rates

The tuberculosis incidence increases progressively with worsening kidney function:

  • CKD stages 1-2: Baseline incidence similar to general population (approximately 10-15 per 100,000 person-years) 2
  • CKD stage 3a: 168 per 100,000 person-years 2
  • CKD stage 3b: 229 per 100,000 person-years 2
  • CKD stage 4: 305 per 100,000 person-years 2
  • CKD stage 5 (not on dialysis): 349 per 100,000 person-years 2

The risk escalates sharply beginning at CKD stage 3a, with a clear dose-response relationship as renal function deteriorates. 2

Dialysis Population Incidence

Patients receiving renal replacement therapy demonstrate particularly high tuberculosis rates:

  • Hemodialysis patients: 1,267 per 100,000 patient-years (85-fold higher than UK background rate) 3
  • Peritoneal dialysis patients: 398 per 100,000 patient-years (26-fold higher than UK background rate) 3
  • Combined dialysis cohort: 256 per 100,000 patient-years 4

Interestingly, patients on long-term dialysis have a hazard ratio of 2.04 for tuberculosis development, which is similar to CKD stage 4 but lower than stage 5 CKD not yet on dialysis. 2 This suggests that dialysis may partially mitigate some immunologic dysfunction present in advanced uremia.

Latent Tuberculosis Infection Prevalence

Among dialysis patients screened with interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA), 25% tested positive for latent tuberculosis infection, significantly higher than the 11% prevalence in severe CKD patients (eGFR <30 mL/min not on dialysis) and 11% in dialysis-unit staff. 5 This indicates that the dialysis environment itself does not substantially increase transmission risk, but rather the immunocompromised state of dialysis patients drives their elevated tuberculosis susceptibility. 5

Clinical Presentation Patterns

The presentation of tuberculosis in CKD patients differs substantially from the general population:

  • Pulmonary involvement: 48-63% of cases 3, 4
  • Extrapulmonary disease: Highly prevalent, with tuberculous lymphadenitis and peritonitis being most common 6
  • Tuberculous peritonitis: Comprises 37% of all tuberculosis cases in CAPD patients 6
  • Symptomatology: Often insidious and nonspecific, mimicking uremic symptoms (anorexia, fever, weight loss) 6

Risk Factors Within CKD Population

Independent predictors of latent tuberculosis infection among patients with renal dysfunction include:

  • Advanced age: Odds ratio 1.03 per year increment 5
  • Prior tuberculosis lesion on chest radiograph: Odds ratio 2.90 5
  • Higher serum albumin: Odds ratio 2.59 per 1 g/dL increment (paradoxically protective, likely reflecting better nutritional status) 5
  • Need for dialysis: Odds ratio 2.47 compared to severe CKD not on dialysis 5
  • Immunosuppression: 50% of CKD patients with tuberculosis had concurrent immunosuppression from medications, diabetes, or HIV 3

Temporal Patterns

The median time from CKD diagnosis to tuberculosis development is 12 months (range 0-192 months), with cases occurring steadily throughout the duration patients remain in advanced CKD or on dialysis. 3, 4 This persistent risk over time underscores that tuberculosis screening should not be a one-time event but rather considered periodically in high-risk CKD populations.

Ethnic and Geographic Considerations

In UK studies, 87% of tuberculosis cases in CKD patients occurred in individuals of Asian/Asian British or black/black British ethnicity, significantly higher than the ethnic distribution of the non-tuberculosis renal cohort. 4 Additionally, 65% of cases in one UK series were in non-UK born ethnic minorities from high-prevalence countries. 3

Drug Resistance Patterns

Among culture-positive tuberculosis cases in CKD patients, 25% had drug-resistant isolates, substantially higher than general population rates. 3 This finding emphasizes the importance of obtaining cultures and drug susceptibility testing in all CKD patients with suspected tuberculosis.

Clinical Implications

The American Thoracic Society and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recognize that patients with renal insufficiency or end-stage renal disease are immunocompromised, and tuberculosis patients with chronic renal failure have worse clinical outcomes than those without renal failure. 7 The WHO guidelines for low tuberculosis burden countries recommend systematic testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in patients receiving dialysis (strong recommendation). 7 The National Kidney Foundation states that chronic renal failure with hemodialysis carries 10-25 times greater tuberculosis risk than the general population. 8

Given the 6.9- to 52.5-fold increased tuberculosis risk in chronic renal failure and dialysis patients compared to the general population 6, and the incidence of 126 per 100,000 patient-years in advanced CKD rising to 1,267 per 100,000 patient-years in hemodialysis patients 1, 3, 4, clinicians must maintain high clinical suspicion for tuberculosis in any CKD patient presenting with nonspecific symptoms, particularly those from high-prevalence ethnic backgrounds or with additional immunosuppression.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.