A 17‑year‑old primigravida with a 5‑week gestation, closed cervical os, no vaginal bleeding, and a transvaginal ultrasound showing an intrauterine gestational sac without embryonic cardiac activity—what is the most likely diagnosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 10, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Intrauterine Pregnancy of Uncertain Viability

The most likely diagnosis is D. Intrauterine pregnancy of uncertain viability (IPUV). At 5 weeks gestation with an intrauterine gestational sac but no visible embryonic cardiac activity, this presentation is entirely consistent with a normal early pregnancy that is too early to definitively assess viability 1.

Diagnostic Reasoning

At 5 weeks gestation, the absence of an embryo or cardiac activity is expected in a completely normal pregnancy. The yolk sac—the first definitive marker of intrauterine pregnancy—typically becomes visible only when the gestational sac exceeds 8 mm in mean sac diameter 1. The embryo and cardiac activity appear even later in normal development 1.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

  • Inevitable miscarriage (A) is ruled out because this diagnosis requires an open cervical os with vaginal bleeding, indicating that pregnancy loss is actively in progress 1, 2. This patient has a closed cervical os and no bleeding 1.

  • Threatened miscarriage (B) is excluded because this diagnosis requires vaginal bleeding with a closed cervical os in the presence of a viable intrauterine pregnancy 1, 2. This patient has no bleeding and viability has not yet been established 1.

  • Pregnancy of unknown location (C) is incorrect because the ultrasound clearly demonstrates an intrauterine gestational sac 3, 1. The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound 2024 consensus explicitly states that PUL requires no evidence of probable or definite intrauterine or ectopic pregnancy 3. An empty gestational sac is considered a probable pregnancy and should not be termed a PUL 3.

Critical Management Principles

Management decisions must never be based on a single ultrasound at this early gestational age, as this risks harm to a normal pregnancy 1. The American College of Radiology emphasizes that at 5 weeks, it is too early to diagnose pregnancy loss based on a single ultrasound 1.

Required Follow-Up

  • Repeat transvaginal ultrasound in 7-14 days to assess for the appearance of a yolk sac, embryo, and cardiac activity 1.

  • Serial β-hCG measurements can help differentiate viable from nonviable pregnancy if diagnosis remains uncertain 4, 5. In viable intrauterine pregnancy, β-hCG typically doubles every 48-72 hours 6.

Definitive Diagnostic Criteria for Pregnancy Loss

The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound 2024 consensus establishes that pregnancy loss can only be diagnosed when 3, 1:

  • Crown-rump length ≥7 mm without cardiac activity, OR
  • Mean sac diameter ≥25 mm without an embryo, OR
  • Absence of embryo ≥14 days after initial visualization of gestational sac

None of these criteria are met in this case 3, 1.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not diagnose pregnancy loss based solely on the absence of cardiac activity at 5 weeks, as this is expected in normal pregnancies at this early stage 1.

  • Guard against injury to normal pregnancies by avoiding overinterpretation of a single early ultrasound 1, 7. Conservative diagnostic guidelines exist specifically to balance the risk of interrupting a viable pregnancy against the anxiety of delayed diagnosis 7.

  • Do not use a single hCG level to guide management in the absence of definitive ultrasound findings; serial measurements are required 1, 6.

References

Guideline

Intrauterine Pregnancy of Uncertain Viability

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Aborto: Etiología, Clasificación, Características Clínicas, Diagnóstico y Tratamiento

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Pregnancy loss: French clinical practice guidelines.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2016

Research

Viability of intrauterine pregnancy in women with pregnancy of unknown location: prediction using human chorionic gonadotropin ratio vs. progesterone.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2010

Guideline

Management of Suspected Gestational Sac with Negative Pregnancy Tests

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

A 5-week pregnant patient with a positive home pregnancy test, closed cervical os, and no bleeding, and a transvaginal ultrasound showing an intrauterine gestational sac without an embryonic heartbeat, what is the most likely diagnosis?
What if the 24-hour human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) level is not elevated?
What methods are recommended for diagnosing pregnancy and assessing fetal viability?
What is the management for a primigravida (first-time pregnant woman) at 12 weeks gestation with no detectable fetal heart rate (FHR)?
What is the management for a single intrauterine pregnancy at 6 weeks 2 days with no fetal cardiac activity?
What preventive measures should be implemented for an obese pregnant woman (pre‑pregnancy BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) to reduce maternal and fetal complications?
What is Clinimix (total parenteral nutrition) infusion?
What is the likely diagnosis and initial management for a 35-year-old adult presenting with neck and shoulder pain without red-flag symptoms?
Which antibiotics provide coverage against Pseudomonas aeruginosa?
In a 25-year-old woman with multiple sclerosis in remission on teriflunomide who experiences transient worsening of symptoms with heat exposure, what explains this phenomenon?
A 38-year-old obese (BMI 36 kg/m²) male smoker with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 7.8%) on metformin, a sodium‑glucose co‑transporter‑2 inhibitor, a dipeptidyl peptidase‑4 inhibitor and basal insulin, untreated hypertension (BP 160/90 mm Hg), LDL‑cholesterol 4.0 mmol/L, and creatinine 150 µmol/L—what is the most appropriate next therapy: bariatric surgery, glucagon‑like peptide‑1 receptor agonist, phentermine, or very‑low‑calorie diet?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.