IMPROVE-IT Trial: Ezetimibe Added to Statin After Acute Coronary Syndrome
Add ezetimibe 10 mg daily to statin therapy in all post-ACS patients with LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL on maximally tolerated statin, and strongly consider it even when LDL-C is 55-69 mg/dL, as the IMPROVE-IT trial demonstrated a 6.4% relative risk reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events over 6 years. 1
Trial Design and Population
IMPROVE-IT randomized 18,144 adults ≥50 years who were hospitalized for ACS within 10 days (median 5 days to randomization) to ezetimibe 10 mg + simvastatin 40 mg versus placebo + simvastatin 40 mg, with median follow-up of 6 years. 1, 2
Eligibility required LDL-C ≥50 mg/dL and ≤125 mg/dL (≤100 mg/dL if already on lipid-lowering therapy), with median baseline LDL-C of 69.5 mg/dL at enrollment. 1
The trial included both STEMI (29%) and UA/NSTEMI (71%) patients, with 34% already on statin therapy at the time of their ACS event. 1, 3
LDL-C Lowering Achieved
Ezetimibe produced an additional 24% greater LDL-C reduction compared with placebo, achieving a median on-treatment LDL-C of 53.2 mg/dL versus 69.9 mg/dL in the simvastatin monotherapy group at 1 year. 2, 4
The absolute LDL-C difference between treatment arms was approximately 17-20 mg/dL across all baseline LDL-C strata. 5
Cardiovascular Outcomes: Primary Endpoint
The primary composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, unstable angina rehospitalization, coronary revascularization ≥30 days, or nonfatal stroke) was reduced with hazard ratio 0.936 (95% CI 0.887-0.996; p=0.016), representing a 6.4% relative risk reduction and approximately 2% absolute risk reduction over 6 years. 1, 2
Benefit manifested early after the index ACS and persisted throughout the entire 6-year follow-up period. 2
Total cardiovascular events (including recurrent events beyond the first) were reduced by 9% (incidence-rate ratio 0.91; 95% CI 0.85-0.97; p=0.007), more than doubling the number of events prevented compared with examining only first events. 4
Benefit Across Baseline LDL-C Levels
The treatment effect was consistent regardless of baseline LDL-C: HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.80-1.05) for LDL-C 50-<70 mg/dL, HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-1.01) for 70-<100 mg/dL, and HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.86-1.03) for 100-125 mg/dL (p interaction=0.95). 5
Normalized relative risk reductions per 1-mmol/L (~39 mg/dL) LDL-C difference were 21% in patients with baseline LDL-C 50-<70 mg/dL, 16% in those with 70-<100 mg/dL, and 13% in those with 100-125 mg/dL. 5
High-Risk Subgroups With Enhanced Benefit
Diabetes mellitus patients achieved the greatest absolute benefit: 7-year absolute risk reduction of 5.5% (event rates 40.0% vs 45.5%; HR 0.85,95% CI 0.78-0.94) with significant interaction (p=0.02). 2
Other high-risk subgroups deriving benefit included patients with:
Safety Profile
Adding ezetimibe to simvastatin did not increase adverse-event rates compared with placebo, and safety was comparable across all high-risk subgroups. 2
No safety concerns emerged even when median LDL-C fell to 53 mg/dL, and the regimen was well-tolerated over the full 6-year period. 2
Current ACC/AHA Guideline Recommendations
Class I (Should Be Done)
- In patients with ACS and LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL on maximally tolerated statin therapy, add a non-statin agent (including ezetimibe) to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events. 1, 6
Class IIa (Reasonable)
- For ACS patients on maximally tolerated statin with LDL-C 55-69 mg/dL, adding ezetimibe is reasonable to further lower MACE risk, especially in high-risk groups (diabetes, elderly, polyvascular disease). 1, 2, 6
Class IIb (May Be Considered)
- Concurrent initiation of ezetimibe with a maximally tolerated statin at the time of ACS hospitalization may be considered to accelerate achievement of LDL-C goals. 1, 6
Clinical Implementation Algorithm
Step 1: Statin Initiation or Intensification
If not on a statin or on low/moderate intensity, start high-intensity statin (atorvastatin 40-80 mg or rosuvastatin 20-40 mg) before hospital discharge. 1, 2, 6
Note that IMPROVE-IT used moderate-intensity simvastatin 40 mg; current guidelines recommend high-intensity statin first. 2
Step 2: Lipid Reassessment
Step 3: LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL on Maximally Tolerated Statin
Step 4: LDL-C 55-69 mg/dL on Maximally Tolerated Statin
- Adding ezetimibe is reasonable (Class IIa), especially in high-risk groups: diabetes, elderly, high TIMI score, polyvascular disease. 2, 6
Step 5: LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL Despite Statin + Ezetimibe
- Consider a PCSK9 inhibitor (evolocumab or alirocumab) for an additional ~50-60% LDL-C reduction. 2, 6
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not de-escalate high-intensity statin therapy even when LDL-C falls to ~53 mg/dL; safety data show no adverse signal at very low LDL-C levels. 2, 6
Do not delay ezetimibe in diabetic ACS patients with LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL, as they achieve the greatest absolute benefit (5.5% reduction over 7 years). 2
Do not accept suboptimal LDL-C levels; only 22% of very high-risk secondary prevention patients in Europe meet LDL-C targets <55 mg/dL. 6
Recognize that IMPROVE-IT used moderate-intensity statin (simvastatin 40 mg); current ACC/AHA guidance recommends initiating high-intensity statin first before adding ezetimibe. 1, 2
Do not assume lack of benefit in patients with baseline LDL-C <70 mg/dL; IMPROVE-IT demonstrated consistent benefit even in patients with baseline LDL-C 50-<70 mg/dL. 5
Evidence Quality
The trial was double-blind, adequately powered, and employed appropriate randomization, with only modest limitation of 19% loss to follow-up. 2
Total events analysis (including recurrent events) more than doubled the number of events prevented, driven by reductions in nonfatal MI (RR 0.87; p=0.004) and nonfatal stroke (RR 0.77; p=0.005). 4