Emergency Laparotomy is the Most Appropriate Next Step
In an elderly woman with hemodynamic instability despite blood transfusion, diffuse abdominal tenderness, and ongoing lower GI bleeding, emergency laparotomy (Option C) is the correct answer because the diffuse abdominal tenderness suggests a surgical abdomen—likely ischemic bowel, perforation, or another catastrophic intra-abdominal process that requires immediate surgical exploration.
Critical Clinical Context
The key distinguishing feature in this case is diffuse abdominal tenderness, which fundamentally changes the management algorithm from standard lower GI bleeding protocols 1, 2.
Diffuse abdominal tenderness in the setting of GI bleeding suggests a surgical emergency such as mesenteric ischemia, bowel perforation, or infarction—conditions that carry mortality rates of 27-57% and require immediate operative intervention 1.
Hemodynamic instability despite blood transfusion (shock index >1) combined with peritoneal signs indicates the patient is actively deteriorating and cannot wait for diagnostic imaging or endoscopic procedures 1, 2.
Why Not the Other Options?
Option A: Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP)
FFP is indicated only for coagulopathy correction when INR >1.5, not as primary therapy for hemorrhagic shock 1, 3.
The question states the patient is "unstable despite receiving blood" but provides no evidence of coagulopathy (no INR mentioned, no warfarin use stated) 1.
FFP does not address the underlying surgical pathology suggested by diffuse abdominal tenderness 1.
Option B: Angiography
Angiography is the correct first-line intervention for hemodynamically unstable lower GI bleeding WITHOUT peritoneal signs 4, 1, 2.
The 2021 ACR Appropriateness Criteria clearly state that CT angiography followed by catheter embolization should be performed in unstable patients with massive lower GI bleeding 4.
However, angiography is contraindicated when diffuse abdominal tenderness suggests a surgical abdomen—attempting angiography would dangerously delay definitive surgical treatment 1, 2.
Transcatheter embolization achieves hemostasis in 40-100% of cases when the bleeding source is vascular (diverticular, angiodysplasia), but it cannot treat ischemic bowel or perforation 4, 1.
Option D: Emergency Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy is explicitly contraindicated in hemodynamically unstable patients (shock index >1) 4, 1, 3.
The 2021 ESGE guidelines state that colonoscopy should be reserved for stable patients or after successful localization and stabilization 3.
Colonoscopy requires adequate bowel preparation (4-6 L polyethylene glycol over 3-4 hours), which is not feasible in an unstable patient 1, 5.
Diffuse abdominal tenderness is a contraindication to colonoscopy due to perforation risk 1, 2.
Standard Algorithm for Unstable Lower GI Bleeding (Without Peritoneal Signs)
For context, here is the evidence-based approach when diffuse tenderness is absent 1, 2:
Confirm hemodynamic instability: Shock index (HR/systolic BP) >1 1, 2, 5
Aggressive resuscitation: Large-bore IV access, crystalloids, restrictive transfusion (Hb threshold 7 g/dL, target 7-9 g/dL) 1, 2, 5
Correct coagulopathy: FFP for INR >1.5, platelets for count <50,000/μL 1, 3
Immediate CT angiography: Sensitivity 79-95%, detects bleeding as low as 0.3 mL/min 1, 2, 5
Catheter angiography with embolization: Within 60 minutes if CTA positive 4, 1
Consider upper endoscopy: If CTA negative (10-15% of severe hematochezia is upper GI) 1, 2
Surgery as last resort: Only after failed angiographic intervention or continued deterioration 4, 1
Why This Case Requires Immediate Surgery
The presence of diffuse abdominal tenderness overrides the standard algorithm because it indicates:
Peritonitis from perforation or ischemia: Requires immediate laparotomy for source control 1, 2
Surgical abdomen: Diagnostic laparotomy is mandatory when the patient remains unstable despite aggressive resuscitation AND has peritoneal signs 1.
Time-critical pathology: Mesenteric ischemia has a mortality of 50-90% if surgery is delayed beyond 12-24 hours 1.
Evidence Hierarchy
2026 Praxis Medical Insights (synthesizing American Gastroenterological Association, American College of Radiology, World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines) states: "If patient remains unstable despite aggressive resuscitation, proceed directly to surgery" 1.
2025 Praxis Medical Insights confirms: "Diagnostic laparotomy with surgical hemostasis is mandatory when the patient remains unstable despite aggressive fluid resuscitation" 2.
2021 ACR Appropriateness Criteria note that surgery is reserved for when "alternative therapeutic tools such as repeat colonoscopy or transcatheter embolization are not feasible or are unavailable" 4—which applies when peritoneal signs are present.
Critical Pitfall to Avoid
Do not delay surgery to pursue imaging or endoscopy when diffuse abdominal tenderness is present 1, 2. Blind segmental resection without localization carries 33% rebleeding and 33-57% mortality, but these statistics apply to elective surgery for unlocalized bleeding—not emergency laparotomy for a surgical abdomen 1. In the presence of peritoneal signs, the priority shifts from bleeding localization to source control of intra-abdominal catastrophe.