Workup for Hematuria
The appropriate workup for hematuria depends critically on whether the hematuria is gross (visible) or microscopic, the patient's age and risk factors, and whether features suggest a glomerular versus urologic source.
Initial Confirmation and Classification
Confirm true hematuria with microscopic urinalysis showing ≥3 red blood cells per high-power field (RBC/HPF) on at least two of three properly collected clean-catch midstream urine specimens before initiating any extensive workup. 1, 2 Dipstick testing alone has only 65-99% specificity and produces false positives from myoglobin, hemoglobin, menstrual contamination, or vigorous exercise. 1, 2
Gross (Visible) Hematuria
Any episode of gross hematuria in an adult warrants urgent urologic evaluation with cystoscopy and upper tract imaging, given the 30-40% risk of malignancy, regardless of whether bleeding is self-limited or a benign cause is suspected. 1, 3 This requires same-day or next-day urologic referral. 1
Microscopic Hematuria
For microscopic hematuria, proceed with risk stratification and determine whether features suggest glomerular versus non-glomerular sources. 1, 2
Distinguishing Glomerular from Non-Glomerular Sources
Examine urinary sediment for dysmorphic RBCs (>80% indicates glomerular disease), red cell casts (pathognomonic for glomerular disease), and quantify proteinuria using spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio. 1, 2, 3
Features Suggesting Glomerular Disease:
- Tea-colored or cola-colored urine 1
- Dysmorphic RBCs >80% on phase-contrast microscopy 1, 3
- Red blood cell casts (pathognomonic) 1, 3
- Significant proteinuria (protein-to-creatinine ratio >0.5 g/g) 1, 3
- Elevated serum creatinine 1, 3
- Hypertension accompanying hematuria 1
If glomerular features are present, refer to nephrology in addition to completing urologic evaluation, as malignancy can coexist with medical renal disease. 1
Features Suggesting Non-Glomerular (Urologic) Source:
- Bright red blood 1
- Normal-shaped (isomorphic) RBCs 3
- Minimal or no proteinuria 3
- Normal serum creatinine 3
Risk Stratification for Urologic Malignancy
For confirmed microscopic hematuria without glomerular features, stratify patients by risk to determine the extent of urologic evaluation needed. 1, 3
High-Risk Features (require full urologic workup: cystoscopy + CT urography):
- Age ≥60 years (both men and women) 1, 3
- Smoking history >30 pack-years 1, 3
- Any history of gross hematuria 1, 3
- Occupational exposure to bladder carcinogens (benzenes, aromatic amines) 1, 3
- Irritative voiding symptoms without documented infection 1, 3
- Degree of hematuria >25 RBC/HPF 1, 3
Intermediate-Risk Features (shared decision-making regarding cystoscopy/imaging):
- Men age 40-59 years 3
- Women age ≥60 years with lower-risk features 3
- Smoking history 10-30 pack-years 3
- Hematuria 11-25 RBC/HPF 3
Low-Risk Features (may defer extensive imaging):
Complete Urologic Evaluation (for High-Risk Patients)
Laboratory Studies:
- Serum creatinine and complete metabolic panel to assess renal function 1, 2
- Complete urinalysis with microscopy 1, 2
- Urine culture if infection suspected (obtain before antibiotics) 1, 2
- Voided urine cytology for high-risk patients (age >60, smoking history, occupational exposure) 1, 2
Upper Tract Imaging:
Multiphasic CT urography is the preferred imaging modality for detecting renal cell carcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma, and urolithiasis in intermediate- and high-risk patients. 1, 2 This includes unenhanced, nephrographic, and excretory phases to comprehensively evaluate kidneys, collecting systems, ureters, and bladder. 1
If CT is contraindicated (renal insufficiency or contrast allergy), MR urography or renal ultrasound with retrograde pyelography are alternatives, though less optimal. 1
Lower Tract Evaluation:
Cystoscopy is mandatory for all patients with gross hematuria and for microscopic hematuria patients with intermediate or high-risk features. 1, 2 Flexible cystoscopy is preferred over rigid cystoscopy because it causes less pain while providing equivalent or superior diagnostic accuracy. 1
Special Considerations
Anticoagulation/Antiplatelet Therapy:
Do not attribute hematuria to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy—these medications may unmask underlying pathology but do not cause hematuria themselves, and evaluation should proceed regardless. 1, 3
Urinary Tract Infection:
If microscopic hematuria resolves within six weeks after completing antibiotics in a low-risk patient, no further urologic workup is required. 1 However, persistent microscopic hematuria after infection treatment requires immediate comprehensive urologic evaluation. 1
Pediatric Patients:
- For isolated microscopic hematuria without proteinuria, imaging is usually not appropriate initially 4, 3
- For gross hematuria, renal and bladder ultrasound is first-line imaging to exclude tumors, stones, and anatomic abnormalities 4, 3
- For traumatic hematuria with concerning mechanism, multiorgan injury, deceleration injury, flank pain/ecchymosis, or congenital renal abnormalities, CT with IV contrast is recommended even with only microscopic hematuria 4, 3
Follow-Up Protocol
If complete workup is negative but hematuria persists, repeat urinalysis, voided urine cytology, and blood pressure measurement at 6,12,24, and 36 months. 1, 2 After two consecutive negative annual urinalyses, no further testing is necessary. 1
Immediate Re-Evaluation Warranted If:
- Gross hematuria develops 1, 2
- Significant increase in degree of microscopic hematuria 1, 2
- New urologic symptoms appear 1, 2
- Development of hypertension, proteinuria, or evidence of glomerular bleeding 1, 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never ignore gross hematuria, even if self-limited—30-40% malignancy risk mandates urgent urologic referral 1, 3
- Do not defer evaluation due to anticoagulation 1, 3
- Do not rely solely on dipstick testing—confirm with microscopic urinalysis showing ≥3 RBCs/HPF before initiating workup 1, 2
- Do not delay urologic referral for gross hematuria even if bleeding resolves spontaneously 3
- Recognize that glomerular features do not eliminate the need for urologic evaluation—both evaluations should be completed 1