What are the indications, technique, contraindications, and alternatives for a vesicoureteral cystourethrogram?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Voiding Cystourethrogram (VCUG): Indications, Technique, Contraindications, and Alternatives

VCUG remains the gold standard for diagnosing vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) because it allows precise grading of reflux and detailed assessment of bladder and urethral anatomy in a single examination, despite concerns about radiation exposure. 1

Indications

Primary Indications for VCUG

  • Initial diagnosis of VUR in children aged 2-24 months presenting with first febrile UTI, particularly when renal ultrasound shows hydronephrosis, scarring, or findings suggesting high-grade VUR or obstructive uropathy 1, 2

  • Atypical or recurrent febrile UTI at any age, where VCUG is usually appropriate for initial imaging 1

  • Prenatal hydronephrosis detected on ultrasound, though VCUG should be delayed at least 48-72 hours after birth to avoid false-positive results 2

  • Neurogenic bladder (particularly myelomeningocele patients), where video-urodynamic studies or VCUG should be performed by 3 months of age to detect secondary VUR and prevent renal deterioration 1, 3

  • Suspected posterior urethral valves in male infants, where VCUG provides critical visualization of the posterior urethra 1, 2

  • Follow-up imaging for established VUR, recommended by the American Urological Association at 12-24 month intervals, with longer intervals for patients with higher grades (III-V), bladder/bowel dysfunction, or older age 1

Age-Specific Considerations

  • Children <2 months: Ultrasound of kidneys and bladder is usually the first-line study, with VCUG reserved for abnormal findings 1

  • Children >6 years with first febrile UTI: The likelihood of detecting previously unknown renal anomalies is low, and routine imaging may not be necessary unless there are atypical features 1

Technique

Standardized Protocol Requirements

A standardized protocol must be followed when performing VCUG to ensure diagnostic accuracy and minimize radiation exposure. 1, 2, 4

Equipment and Setup

  • Fluoroscopy unit with recording capabilities 2
  • Sterile catheterization kit with appropriately sized Foley catheter 2
  • Contrast medium, sterile drapes, and gloves 2

Procedural Steps

  1. Patient positioning: Place patient supine on fluoroscopy table 2

  2. Catheterization: Insert appropriately sized Foley catheter using sterile technique 2

  3. Bladder filling: Fill bladder with contrast under gravity at approximately 100 cm above the table 2

  4. Cyclic imaging: Perform at least 2 filling-voiding cycles to detect intermittent VUR, as 21.2% of reflux cases are diagnosed only after an initial negative cycle, with 69.2% of these being dilating (clinically significant) reflux 5, 4

  5. Voiding images: Obtain images during voiding to assess bladder emptying, urethral anatomy, and reflux during micturition 2, 6

  6. Special attention in males: Carefully visualize the posterior urethra to detect posterior urethral valves 1, 2

Radiation Dose Optimization

  • Cyclic studies performed in younger children actually result in lower median radiation doses (2.15 microGy m² vs 4.41 microGy m²) compared to single-cycle studies, likely due to more efficient technique 5

  • Simplified protocols using only full-bladder and post-void images show 87.2-100% sensitivity and specificity for detecting reflux while significantly reducing radiation exposure 7

Contraindications

Absolute Contraindications

  • Active urinary tract infection: VCUG should be deferred until after symptom resolution and completion of antibiotic therapy 8

  • Acute pyelonephritis: Performing VCUG during an active infection episode is not recommended 8

Relative Contraindications

  • Severe urethral trauma: Alternative imaging should be considered

  • Known severe contrast allergy: Though iodinated contrast is not absorbed systemically from the bladder in significant amounts

Timing Considerations

  • Newborns with antenatal hydronephrosis: Wait at least 48-72 hours after birth to avoid false-positive results 2

  • Post-UTI timing: Perform after infection has resolved and antibiotic course completed 8

Alternatives to VCUG

Contrast-Enhanced Voiding Urosonography (ceVUS)

ceVUS is the primary alternative to VCUG, with comparable diagnostic accuracy and no ionizing radiation. 1, 6

  • Sensitivity and specificity: 80-100% and 77.5-98%, respectively, with diagnostic accuracy of 78-96% compared to fluoroscopic VCUG 1

  • Advantages: Some studies suggest ceVUS is more sensitive than VCUG for detecting dilated VUR, particularly when using transperineal approach for improved bladder and urethral evaluation 1

  • 3D/4D techniques: Advanced ultrasound techniques with ceVUS result in greater detection of reflux compared to conventional VCUG 1

  • European Society of Paediatric Radiology recommendation: Strongly recommends ceVUS as a non-radiating technique whenever indicated and possible 6

  • Current guideline status: European Association of Urology gives ceVUS a "weak" recommendation as an alternative to VCUG for VUR diagnosis 1

Nuclear Medicine Cystography

  • Useful for follow-up imaging of established VUR, recommended at 12-24 month intervals 1

  • Lower radiation dose than VCUG but cannot grade reflux as precisely and provides limited anatomical detail 1

  • Primary evidence supporting nuclear cystography is generally older than other modalities 1

Magnetic Resonance Urography (MRU)

  • Suggested as a safer alternative for follow-up imaging of VUR causing renal scarring, particularly in children requiring serial studies 1

  • Not appropriate for initial VUR diagnosis due to cost, need for sedation in young children, and inability to assess dynamic voiding

DMSA Renal Scan

  • Not an alternative to VCUG for diagnosing VUR, but complementary for detecting renal scarring and differential kidney function 1

  • Considered the best nuclear agent for visualizing cortical tissue 1

  • May be appropriate for follow-up after febrile UTI or when renal ultrasound is abnormal 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Technical Pitfalls

  • Single-cycle studies in young children: Performing only one filling-voiding cycle misses 21.2% of VUR cases; younger children who cannot control voiding require cyclic cystography 5, 4

  • Inadequate visualization of male posterior urethra: May miss posterior urethral valves, which require careful attention during voiding phase 1, 2

  • Premature VCUG in newborns: Performing before 48-72 hours of life increases false-positive rates 2

Clinical Decision Pitfalls

  • Delaying VCUG beyond 3 months in neurogenic bladder: Early identification of hostile bladder patterns allows timely intervention with clean intermittent catheterization and anticholinergics, preventing irreversible bladder dysfunction 3

  • Relying on ultrasound alone to exclude VUR: Normal postnatal ultrasound does not exclude reflux; VUR risk may be as high as 25% even with mildly dilated or non-dilated collecting systems 3

  • Performing VCUG during active infection: Increases risk of bacteremia and may yield false-positive results for reflux 8

Infection Risk

  • Iatrogenic UTI occurs in approximately 2% of VCUGs performed for antenatal hydronephrosis evaluation 2

  • Consider prophylactic antibiotics in high-risk patients, though routine prophylaxis remains controversial 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Voiding Cystourethrogram Procedure Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

VCUG in Pediatric Meningocele with Neurogenic Bladder

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Bilateral Vesicoureteral Reflux in Adults: Risks, Diagnosis, and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.