What is a concise summary of the FOURIER trial of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab, including its dosing regimen and the significance of its findings for low‑density lipoprotein cholesterol management?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

FOURIER Trial Summary: Evolocumab for LDL-Cholesterol Management

Trial Design and Patient Population

The FOURIER trial enrolled 27,564 adults aged 40–85 years with clinically evident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and additional risk factors, requiring fasting LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL or non-HDL-C ≥100 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. 1

Baseline Characteristics

  • 81% had prior myocardial infarction (median 3.3 years before enrollment) 1
  • 20% had non-hemorrhagic stroke 1
  • 13% had symptomatic peripheral arterial disease 1
  • Median baseline LDL-C was 92 mg/dL (mean approximately 98 mg/dL) 1
  • 69% were on high-intensity statins, 30% on moderate-intensity statins, and 5% also received ezetimibe 1

Dosing Regimen

Evolocumab was administered as 140 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks or 420 mg monthly, with 86% of participants using the every-2-week regimen. 1 Both dosing schedules demonstrated comparable efficacy in LDL-C reduction. 1

Lipid-Lowering Efficacy

At 48 weeks, evolocumab reduced LDL-C by 59% from baseline, achieving a median LDL-C of 30 mg/dL. 1 The absolute LDL-C reduction averaged 62 mg/dL. 1 Additional lipid effects included:

  • Non-HDL-C decreased by 51% 1
  • Lipoprotein(a) fell by 27% 1
  • Triglycerides reduced by 16% 1
  • HDL-C increased by 8% 1

Cardiovascular Outcomes

Over a median follow-up of 2.2 years, evolocumab reduced the primary composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina hospitalization, or coronary revascularization) by 15% (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.79–0.92; p<0.001). 1

Key Secondary Endpoint

The composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was reduced by 20% (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.73–0.88; p<0.001). 1

Absolute Risk Reductions

  • Primary endpoint: 1.5% absolute risk reduction, NNT = 67 over 2.2 years 1
  • Key secondary endpoint: 2.5% absolute risk reduction, NNT = 40 1

Stroke Prevention

All strokes were reduced by 21% (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66–0.95; p=0.01) and ischemic strokes by 25% (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.62–0.92; p=0.005). 1, 2

Mortality

No significant difference was observed in cardiovascular death or all-cause mortality during the trial. 1 This finding is consistent with high-dose versus low-dose statin trials and reflects the short duration of follow-up (2.2 years) against a background of contemporary high-intensity statin therapy. 3 However, long-term follow-up data from FOURIER-OLE demonstrated a 23% reduction in cardiovascular death (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60–0.99; p=0.04) with extended treatment up to 8.4 years. 4

Safety Profile

Serious adverse events occurred at similar rates in evolocumab and placebo arms (24.8% vs 24.7%). 1 Key safety findings include:

  • Injection-site reactions: 2.1% with evolocumab vs 1.6% with placebo 1
  • No increase in new-onset diabetes, muscle-related events, or liver enzyme elevations 1
  • Neurocognitive event rates were similar between groups, including in patients achieving very low LDL-C (<10 mg/dL) 1
  • No safety signal detected in approximately 10% of participants achieving LDL-C <10 mg/dL 1

Clinical Significance

High-Risk Subgroups

Patients with peripheral arterial disease experienced similar relative risk reduction but larger absolute benefit, including a reduction in major limb events (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.38–0.88; p=0.0093). 5 Patients with metabolic syndrome showed a 17% relative risk reduction for the primary endpoint (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.76–0.91) and 24% reduction for the key secondary endpoint (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.68–0.86). 6

LDL-C Threshold Relationship

A continuous, monotonic relationship between achieved LDL-C levels (down to <20 mg/dL) and ASCVD risk was observed, with no apparent threshold effect. 1 This finding supports the concept that "lower is better" for LDL-C reduction in very high-risk patients.

Trial Duration Context

The trial was event-driven rather than time-driven; the median 26-month duration occurred because the observed event rate was higher than anticipated, allowing accrual of 1,829 key secondary endpoints (exceeding the planned 1,630). 3 The predominant effect was prevention of non-fatal cardiovascular events, mainly driven by myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization, with fatal MI or stroke accounting for only 5–10% of all events. 3

Guideline Integration

The FOURIER trial, together with the SPIRE trials, constituted a key step forward in demonstrating that PCSK9 inhibition provides definitive cardiovascular benefit in patients with very high residual risk despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. 3 The key determinants of clinical benefit are absolute cardiovascular risk, absolute magnitude of LDL-C reduction, and absolute LDL-C level achieved. 3

Related Questions

For an adult patient already on a high‑intensity statin with LDL‑C ≥70 mg/dL (or ≥100 mg/dL with additional risk factors), should I add the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab (evolocumab) based on the FOURIER trial results?
What is the role of Evolocumab (Repatha) in primary prevention of cardiovascular events in high-risk individuals?
What were the inclusion criteria, dosing regimen, baseline LDL‑C levels, and cardiovascular outcomes of the FOURIER trial evaluating evolocumab (PCSK9 inhibitor) in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease on maximally tolerated statin therapy?
What were the LDL‑C reduction and cardiovascular outcome benefits of Repatha (evolocumab) 140 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks (or 420 mg monthly) in the FOURIER trial for adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL‑C ≥70 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated statin therapy?
Does Repatha (evolocumab) affect hypertension?
What radiographic features differentiate degenerative joint disease (osteoarthritis) from osteomyelitis, and what are the recommended next steps for diagnosis and management?
Should antibiotics be administered to an elderly hospitalized patient with laboratory‑confirmed respiratory syncytial virus infection?
What are the appropriate first‑line oral antibiotics for a healthy 15‑year‑old with an uncomplicated urinary tract infection, assuming acceptable local E. coli resistance and no sulfa allergy?
Is inhaled N‑acetylcysteine (Mucomyst) appropriate for an elderly hospitalized patient with laboratory‑confirmed respiratory syncytial virus infection?
What non‑hormonal vaginal moisturizers are available for a postmenopausal woman with vaginal dryness and spotting?
What are the diagnostic criteria for catheter‑related bloodstream infection (CRBSI)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.