How should I evaluate and manage an adult with right lower quadrant pain, fever, anorexia, nausea/vomiting, and neutrophilic leukocytosis suggestive of appendicitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Approach to Suspected Appendicitis in Adults

Obtain contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast immediately as the definitive diagnostic test for any adult presenting with right lower quadrant pain, fever, anorexia, nausea/vomiting, and leukocytosis suggestive of appendicitis. 1, 2

Initial Clinical Assessment

Key Clinical Features to Document:

  • Pain migration pattern: Classic appendicitis begins with periumbilical or epigastric pain that migrates to the right lower quadrant within 12-24 hours 1, 3
  • Associated symptoms: Anorexia, nausea, and vomiting are present in approximately 90% of cases when combined with RLQ pain 3, 4
  • Fever presence: Fever is absent in approximately 50% of appendicitis cases, so its absence does NOT exclude the diagnosis 1, 5
  • Peritoneal signs: Check for rebound tenderness, guarding, and rigidity in the RLQ 1
  • Psoas sign: Test for pain with hip extension or flexion, which suggests retroperitoneal irritation from a retrocecal appendix 3

Critical Pitfall: Clinical assessment alone misdiagnoses appendicitis in 34-68% of cases, with negative appendectomy rates of 14.7-25% when relying on examination without imaging 1. Even with classic presentation, imaging is essential because typical features are only present in ~50% of cases 1.

Diagnostic Imaging Algorithm

Primary Imaging Recommendation:

  • CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast (without oral contrast) achieves 85.7-100% sensitivity and 94.8-100% specificity for appendicitis 1, 2, 3
  • CT without enteral contrast allows rapid acquisition without delays from oral contrast administration 1
  • CT identifies alternative diagnoses in 23-45% of patients with RLQ pain, fundamentally changing management 1, 2

Alternative Ultrasound-First Approach (institutional preference):

  • Point-of-care ultrasound or graded compression ultrasound may be performed first 2
  • If ultrasound is nondiagnosive, equivocal, or limited by body habitus, proceed immediately to CT 1, 2
  • Combined ultrasound-then-CT strategy achieves 99% sensitivity and 91% specificity 1
  • Limitation: Ultrasound has significantly reduced accuracy in obese patients (false diagnosis rate 46.2% in obese females vs 38.5% in non-obese) 2

For reproductive-age women: Consider transvaginal ultrasound before CT to evaluate gynecologic causes (ovarian torsion, ectopic pregnancy, ovarian cyst, PID), which account for 21.6% of alternative diagnoses 1

Laboratory Testing

  • Complete blood count: Leukocytosis with left shift supports but does not confirm appendicitis; normal WBC reduces probability (negative likelihood ratio 0.25) but does not exclude it 1, 5
  • C-reactive protein: Significantly elevated in appendicitis; normal inflammatory markers (WBC + CRP) have 100% negative predictive value 3

Important caveat: 15.6% of confirmed appendicitis cases present with isolated RLQ pain without fever or elevated inflammatory markers 5. Do not discharge based on normal labs alone.

CT Interpretation and Risk Stratification

High-Risk CT Findings (proceed directly to surgery):

  • Appendiceal diameter ≥8.2 mm with periappendiceal fat stranding 1
  • Appendicolith present 1, 4
  • Appendiceal diameter >13 mm 4
  • Mass effect or abscess formation 4

These findings predict >90% probability of true appendicitis and 40% failure rate with antibiotics-first approach 1, 4.

Borderline Findings (7-8 mm diameter without periappendiceal changes):

  • Consider 24-hour hospital observation with serial abdominal exams every 6-12 hours 1
  • Repeat CBC to monitor leukocytosis trend 1
  • Proceed to surgery if symptoms progress or peritoneal signs develop 1

Management Based on CT Results

CT Confirms Appendicitis:

  • Immediate surgical consultation for appendectomy (laparoscopic preferred) 1, 3, 4
  • Initiate broad-spectrum antibiotics: piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy OR cephalosporin/fluoroquinolone + metronidazole 4
  • If perforated with abscess: consider percutaneous drainage followed by interval appendectomy 1, 3

CT Negative but High Clinical Suspicion Persists:

  • Proceed to diagnostic laparoscopy, which provides both diagnostic confirmation and therapeutic intervention 1, 2, 3

CT Identifies Alternative Diagnosis:

  • Common findings include right colonic diverticulitis (8%), ureteral stones, intestinal obstruction (3%), gynecologic pathology (21.6%), and other GI conditions (46%) 1
  • Manage according to specific diagnosis identified 1

Supportive Care During Evaluation

  • IV fluid resuscitation for dehydration from vomiting 3
  • Antiemetics: metoclopramide, prochlorperazine, or ondansetron 3
  • Mild analgesia: Avoid opioids initially as they may mask evolving symptoms 1
  • NPO status while awaiting imaging and surgical evaluation 1

Discharge Criteria and Follow-Up

Safe discharge requires ALL of the following:

  • Normal CT scan without evidence of appendicitis 1
  • Absence of peritoneal signs on exam 1
  • Ability to tolerate oral intake 1
  • Reliable access to 24-hour follow-up 1

Mandatory return precautions: Instruct patients to return immediately for worsening pain, fever development, persistent vomiting, or increasing abdominal tenderness 1. False-negative rates exist even in low-risk presentations, necessitating close follow-up 1.

References

Guideline

Management of Suspected Appendicitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Right Iliac Fossa Pain

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Acute Appendicitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Related Questions

What is the differential diagnosis for a patient presenting with nausea, vomiting, back pain, and right lower quadrant pain?
What is the diagnosis and management for a patient with an appendicolith and ongoing right lower quadrant abdominal pain?
What is the most appropriate management for a patient with increasing right lower quadrant pain and rebound tenderness, suspected of having acute appendicitis?
What is the management for suspected appendicitis in an 18-year-old with severe right lower quadrant abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and fever?
In a 45‑year‑old man presenting to the emergency department with cough‑induced pain radiating to the back, could this be appendicitis?
What is the recommended cefuroxime dosing for an uncomplicated urinary tract infection in an adult with normal renal function, including adjustments for impaired renal function and pediatric patients?
In a premenopausal woman with an incidental simple ovarian cyst ≤5 cm and a small asymptomatic uterine fibroid ≤3 cm, what is the recommended management?
What is the recommended initial insulin regimen for a patient with pancreatic (type 3c) diabetes, especially given the frequent coexisting exocrine pancreatic insufficiency?
What is the recommended first‑line therapy for uncomplicated hookworm infection in otherwise healthy children or adults, and what alternatives are appropriate for pregnant patients or those with severe anemia or malnutrition?
How should I monitor and manage a morbidly obese patient started on Wegovy (semaglutide) for weight loss?
How should I adjust the rate of 3% NaCl in a severely symptomatic adult with hyponatremia (serum sodium <120 mEq/L)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.