In a patient with high‑impact trauma (e.g., motor vehicle collision) who presents with loss of consciousness or coma but has a normal initial non‑contrast CT, how should diffuse axonal injury be diagnosed and managed?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diffuse Axonal Injury: Diagnosis and Management

Immediate Diagnostic Approach

In a patient with high-impact trauma presenting with loss of consciousness or coma but a normal initial CT, you must proceed directly to MRI with specific sequences (T2-weighted gradient-echo, susceptibility-weighted imaging, and diffusion-weighted imaging) to diagnose diffuse axonal injury, as CT detects only 10% of DAI cases.* 1, 2

Initial Imaging Strategy

  • Non-contrast CT remains mandatory as the first-line imaging in all patients with suspected moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, performed immediately upon presentation 3, 2, 4
  • CT has severe limitations for DAI detection because microhemorrhages associated with axonal injury are frequently invisible on conventional CT, missing approximately 90% of cases 1, 2, 4
  • When CT is normal but persistent unexplained neurologic findings exist (such as prolonged coma after high-impact trauma), MRI is indicated with a Class I recommendation 3, 1, 2, 4

Optimal MRI Protocol for DAI Detection

The American College of Radiology recommends the following specific sequences 1, 2, 4:

  • T2-weighted gradient-echo (GRE) imaging*: Sensitive to microhemorrhages in acute, early subacute, and chronic stages of DAI 1
  • Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI): 3-6 times more sensitive than T2* GRE for detecting hemorrhagic axonal injuries 1, 2
  • Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): Visualizes non-hemorrhagic axonal injuries not appreciated on other sequences 1, 2

MRI can detect DAI lesions within the first 24 hours after injury, with approximately 27% of mild TBI patients with normal CT showing abnormalities on early MRI that improve prediction of 3-month outcomes 1, 2

Acute Physiological Management

Hemodynamic Targets

Maintain systolic blood pressure >110 mmHg to ensure adequate cerebral perfusion, as mortality increases markedly when systolic pressure drops below this threshold 3, 2, 4

  • Avoid any episode of hypotension (SBP <90 mmHg), which compounds secondary brain injury 3, 2
  • Use vasopressor drugs (phenylephrine, norepinephrine) for rapid correction rather than waiting for delayed effects from fluid resuscitation or sedative adjustment 3
  • Avoid hypotensive agents for sedation induction 3

Ventilation Management

Control ventilation through tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation with end-tidal CO2 monitoring (Grade 1+ recommendation), even during the pre-hospital period 3, 2, 4

  • Prevent hypocapnia, which causes cerebral vasoconstriction and increases the risk of brain ischemia 3, 2, 4
  • Target EtCO2 between 30-35 mmHg prior to obtaining arterial blood gas samples 3
  • Pre-hospital tracheal intubation decreases mortality in trauma patients 3

Intracranial Pressure Management

  • ICP monitoring is recommended for patients with severe TBI to detect intracranial hypertension, with intervention threshold typically at ICP >20 mmHg 2
  • External ventricular drainage is suggested for treating persisting intracranial hypertension despite sedation and correction of secondary brain insults (Grade 2+ recommendation) 3, 2
  • Decompressive craniectomy may be considered for refractory intracranial hypertension in multidisciplinary discussion 2

Prognostic Assessment

MRI-Based Prognostic Indicators

  • The presence of both a contusion and >4 foci of hemorrhagic axonal injury on MRI is an independent prognostic predictor 1, 2, 4
  • DAI grading correlates strongly with outcomes: Grade III DAI (dorsolateral brainstem lesions) is associated with poor outcomes and highest mortality 1, 2, 4
  • The location and extent of DAI lesions correlate with clinical outcomes 1, 2

Important Caveat

  • The number of microhemorrhages, while helpful for accurate diagnosis, is not currently thought to be associated with injury severity or outcomes 1

Management Strategies

Primary Treatment Principle

Management focuses on preventing secondary brain injury, as there is no specific treatment for the primary axonal damage itself 1, 2, 4

Rehabilitation Approach

  • Early physical therapy and rehabilitation are essential to prevent joint contractures and muscle atrophy, including proper positioning, frequent repositioning, range of motion exercises, and splinting 2, 4
  • Regular multidisciplinary case reviews are recommended for patients with severe DAI 1, 2, 4
  • Early communication with regional neuroscience centers is essential for patients with perceived devastating brain injury 2, 4

Follow-up Imaging

  • Follow-up imaging is indicated with neurological deterioration rather than on a routine basis 2
  • Repeat CT is recommended for patients with epidural, subdural, and parenchymal hematomas, but may be less likely to alter clinical management in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage 2

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Do not rely on CT alone: Only 10% of DAI is positive on CT because most lesions lack macroscopic hemorrhage 1, 2
  • Do not use gadolinium-based contrast agents for conventional MRI in TBI (Class IIb recommendation) 1
  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) shows promise in research settings but has insufficient evidence to support routine clinical use at the individual patient level 1
  • For elderly patients with severe injuries unlikely to be fully recoverable, early insertion of palliative medicine consultation improves outcomes, reduces in-hospital mortality and length of stay, and improves communication with family 2, 4

References

Guideline

Management of Diffuse Axonal Injury

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management of Diffuse Axonal Injury

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diffuse Axonal Injury Management and Prognosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.