What is the Goodman assessment tool and what does it assess?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

The Goodman Assessment Tool (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire)

The Goodman assessment tool, formally known as the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), is a brief screening instrument designed to measure psychological adjustment and detect psychosocial problems in children and adolescents aged 3-16 years (though validated up to age 25). 1

What the SDQ Assesses

The SDQ evaluates five distinct dimensions of child and adolescent mental health:

  • Emotional problems (symptoms of depression and anxiety) 1
  • Conduct problems (behavioral difficulties and rule-breaking) 1
  • Hyperactivity/inattention problems (ADHD-related symptoms) 1
  • Peer relationship problems (social difficulties with other children) 1
  • Prosocial behavior (positive social behaviors and strengths) 1

The first four subscales combine to create a Total Difficulties Score, which serves as the primary screening metric for overall psychopathology 2

Psychometric Properties and Validity

The SDQ demonstrates satisfactory reliability and validity across multiple age groups and informants, with the Total Difficulties Score being more reliable than individual subscales. 2

Reliability Metrics:

  • Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) averages 0.73 across subscales, with the Total Difficulties Score reaching 0.77-0.81 2, 1
  • Test-retest stability after 4-6 months averages 0.62 1
  • Cross-informant correlation (parent-teacher agreement) averages 0.34, with ICCs ranging from 0.21-0.44 2, 1

Validity for Detecting Disorders:

  • SDQ scores above the 90th percentile predict substantially elevated probability of DSM-IV psychiatric disorders, with odds ratios of 15.7 for parent scales, 15.2 for teacher scales, and 6.2 for youth self-reports 1
  • The emotional subscale shows moderate accuracy for Major Depressive Disorder (AUC = 0.67-0.85) and high accuracy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (AUC = 0.80-0.93) 3
  • The SDQ predicts behavioral disorders better than mood disorders 4

Administration and Informants

The SDQ can be completed by three different informants:

  • Parents/caregivers (most commonly used, available for ages 3-16+) 1
  • Teachers (provides school-based perspective) 2, 1
  • Youth self-report (for ages 11-25 years) 5, 1

Parent and teacher versions demonstrate better reliability than youth self-reports, particularly for externalizing behaviors like hyperactivity 2

Age Range and Developmental Considerations

The SDQ has been validated across a wide developmental span from ages 5-6 years through age 25, though originally designed for ages 3-16 5, 2, 3

  • The five-factor structure remains stable across pre-adolescence (10-12 years), early adolescence (13-15 years), and late adolescence (16-19 years) 5
  • Factor loadings differ across age groups, with some items (particularly item 11 on friendship) showing weaker performance 5
  • The instrument performs consistently across sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic subgroups 4

Clinical Application and Screening Cutoffs

For screening purposes in general populations, use the Total Difficulties Score rather than individual subscales, as several subscales have reliability below 0.70 2

Cutoff Considerations:

  • The traditional 90th percentile cutoff provides 39% sensitivity and 93% specificity 4
  • Lowering the cutoff to the 80th percentile increases sensitivity to 63% while maintaining 87% specificity, which may be preferable for screening applications where missing cases has greater consequences 4

Important Caveats

  • The Prosocial Behavior subscale shows unclear construct validity and conceptual clarity, so interpret this subscale with caution 5
  • Interrater agreement between parents and teachers is modest (as expected for behavioral assessments), with correlations higher for males than females 2
  • Self-reports discriminate better for emotional and peer problems, while parent/proxy reports discriminate better for hyperactivity symptoms 5
  • Some subscales require correlated error terms in factor analysis for optimal model fit, suggesting item-level complexity 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.