For a patient with a non‑MALT orbital lymphoma recurrence presenting with gross disease, what curative radiation dose should be administered?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Radiation Dose for Non-MALT Orbital Lymphoma Recurrence with Gross Disease

For a non-MALT orbital lymphoma recurrence presenting with gross disease, deliver 36–40 Gy using involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) if the orbit has not been previously irradiated. 1, 2

Dose Selection Based on Histology

Non-MALT orbital lymphomas are typically intermediate- or high-grade histologies (diffuse large B-cell, follicular grade 3, or transformed lymphomas) that require higher radiation doses than indolent MALT lymphomas to achieve durable local control. 1, 3

  • Deliver 36–40 Gy in 1.8–2.0 Gy fractions for intermediate/high-grade orbital lymphomas. 1, 2
  • The Stanford experience demonstrated that intermediate and high-grade orbital lesions required 36–40 Gy for optimal control, compared to 30–35 Gy for low-grade disease. 1
  • A German series treating aggressive orbital lymphomas used a median dose of 44 Gy (range 20–48 Gy), achieving 80% local control in advanced stages. 2

Evidence Supporting Higher Doses for Non-Indolent Histologies

Patients with intermediate/high-grade orbital lymphoma have significantly worse outcomes than those with indolent disease, with 5-year cause-specific survival of only 33% versus 89% for low-grade histology. 4

  • In-field failures in intermediate/high-grade lymphomas occurred evenly across the dose range, with 8 failures distributed throughout, suggesting that doses below 36 Gy are insufficient for aggressive histologies. 3
  • All in-field failures in low-grade disease occurred at doses <30 Gy, but no such threshold was protective for intermediate/high-grade disease at lower doses. 3

Treatment Planning Specifications

Use ISRT technique following International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG) definitions for extranodal sites. 5

  • Employ photon beams (6–10 MV) to cover the entire orbit when intraorbital tissues are involved. 6
  • Electrons (9–12 MeV) may be used only if disease is strictly confined to conjunctiva or eyelid, which is uncommon in recurrent gross disease. 6
  • Deliver 1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction, five fractions per week, never exceeding 2 Gy per fraction. 7

Critical Organ-at-Risk Constraints

Implement lens shielding whenever anatomically feasible to prevent cataract formation. 1, 4

  • Cataract risk increases markedly when lens dose exceeds 4–5 Gy; seven of 21 patients without lens shielding developed cataracts versus zero of 17 with shielding. 4, 5
  • Keep total orbital dose below 36 Gy when possible to minimize risk of ischemic retinopathy, optic atrophy, corneal ulceration, and glaucoma. 7, 5
  • However, for non-MALT recurrent disease with gross involvement, oncologic control takes priority; doses of 36–40 Gy are justified despite slightly elevated late toxicity risk. 2

When Radiation Is Not Feasible

If the orbit has already received maximum safe radiation dose, transition to systemic therapy rather than attempting re-irradiation. 5

  • Rituximab plus chlorambucil is the preferred systemic regimen, supported by phase III evidence showing superior complete response and progression-free survival in marginal-zone lymphomas. 5
  • Rituximab monotherapy, alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil), or purine analogues (fludarabine, cladribine) are acceptable alternatives. 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use the 24 Gy dose recommended for indolent MALT lymphomas; non-MALT histologies require 36–40 Gy for adequate control. 1, 2
  • Do not use the ultra-low 4 Gy/2-fraction palliative regimen for curative-intent treatment of recurrent gross disease. 7, 5
  • Do not compromise dose to avoid late effects in patients with aggressive histology and gross disease; local control is the priority for survival. 2, 3
  • Doses exceeding 36 Gy increase grade 3 late complications (primarily cataract and dry eye), but this risk is acceptable for non-indolent recurrent disease. 2

References

Research

Radiotherapy is successful treatment for orbital lymphoma.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 1993

Research

Radiotherapy for orbital lymphoma : outcome and late effects.

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2007

Research

Radiotherapy in the management of orbital lymphoma.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 1999

Guideline

Management of Recurrent Orbital Lymphoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Radiation therapy for orbital lymphoma.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2005

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.