What is the standard formula for estimating fetal birth weight using ultrasound measurements?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Standard Formulas for Estimating Fetal Birth Weight Using Ultrasound

The Hadlock formula incorporating head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) is the most accurate method for estimating fetal weight across all gestational ages and should be used as the standard approach. 1

Primary Recommendation: Hadlock Formula

The 1985 Hadlock formula using HC, AC, and FL measurements provides:

  • The highest accuracy with 80% of estimates within 10% of actual birth weight 1
  • A correlation coefficient of 0.959 with actual birth weight 1
  • The lowest Euclidean distance and highest proportion of acceptable error across all weight ranges 1

This formula outperforms all 70 other published models for estimated fetal weight (EFW), including newer formulas like INTERGROWTH. 1

Required Ultrasound Measurements

Fetal biometry for weight estimation should include 2:

  • Biparietal diameter (BPD)
  • Head circumference (HC)
  • Abdominal circumference (AC)
  • Femur length (FL)

These measurements are combined using regression equations to generate the estimated fetal weight 3.

Alternative Formulas for Specific Clinical Scenarios

For Very Low Birth Weight Fetuses (<1500g)

  • The Hadlock formulas remain most accurate even for very small fetuses 4
  • Specific formulas designed for fetuses <1500g do not substantially improve accuracy over Hadlock 4
  • The Scott formula showed the narrowest limits of agreement in this population but was not superior to Hadlock 4

For Preterm Fetuses (22-34 weeks)

  • Hadlock formula significantly outperforms INTERGROWTH in preterm populations 5
  • Mean percentage error for Hadlock: -0.7% vs INTERGROWTH: -3.5% (p<0.001) 5
  • 68.7% of estimates within ±10% of birthweight using Hadlock vs 57.8% using INTERGROWTH 5

For Macrosomic Fetuses

  • Merz's regression formula shows best performance for macrosomic newborns 6
  • Gender-specific Schild formula performs well for infants 2500-3999g 6

Critical Clinical Context

Importance of Accurate Dating

Accurate pregnancy dating using first-trimester crown-rump length is essential for interpreting fetal weight estimates, as misdating leads to misclassification of growth abnormalities. 7, 3

Clinical Thresholds for Action

  • Fetal growth restriction (FGR): EFW or AC <10th percentile for gestational age 3
  • Severe FGR: EFW <3rd percentile, associated with increased adverse outcomes regardless of Doppler findings 7, 3
  • Small for gestational age: EFW <10th percentile 2

Measurement Standards

Birth weight should be collected within 24 hours of birth using a calibrated electronic scale with 10-g resolution 2.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Examiner experience significantly impacts accuracy - skilled sonographers achieve much higher correlation coefficients across all formulas 6. This emphasizes the importance of:

  • Proper training in obtaining biometric measurements
  • Quality assurance programs for ultrasound measurements
  • Recognition that formula accuracy depends on measurement precision

Do not use customized growth standards - the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends population-based references rather than customized standards when determining fetal weight percentiles 7, 3.

References

Research

Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2018

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Estimated Fetal Weight (EFW)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Do specific weight formulas for fetuses < or = 1500 g really improve weight estimation?

Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980), 2010

Guideline

Fetal Weight Estimation at 31 Weeks Gestation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.