Interpret the complete transthoracic echocardiogram (two‑dimensional, motion mode, Doppler) for a 188 cm, 110 kg (BMI 31 kg/m²) adult with blood pressure 117/67 mm Hg, evaluating aortic valve anatomy and gradients, left ventricular dimensions, concentric hypertrophy, ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, diastolic function, and any other significant cardiac findings.

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Echocardiogram Interpretation: Structurally Normal Heart with Subclinical Myocardial Dysfunction

This echocardiogram reveals a structurally normal heart with preserved ejection fraction (61%) but demonstrates subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction evidenced by borderline-reduced global longitudinal strain (-15.8%) in the setting of mild concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, likely related to the patient's obesity (BMI 31.3 kg/m²) and requiring aggressive cardiovascular risk factor modification to prevent progression to overt heart failure. 1, 2

Aortic Valve Assessment

  • The aortic valve is trileaflet with normal structure and function, showing no evidence of stenosis or regurgitation 1
  • Peak aortic velocity is 1.37 m/s with mean gradient of 4.2 mmHg, well below thresholds for any degree of stenosis (severe AS requires mean gradient ≥40 mmHg or peak velocity ≥4 m/s) 1
  • Calculated aortic valve area by continuity equation is 3.0-3.1 cm² (indexed 1.3 cm²/m²), confirming no stenosis (severe AS defined as <1.0 cm² or <0.6 cm²/m²) 1
  • The aortic root diameter is 3.1 cm, which is normal for body size 1

Left Ventricular Structure and Systolic Function

Concerning Finding: Discordance Between Ejection Fraction and Strain

  • The ejection fraction of 61% appears reassuring but masks early myocardial dysfunction revealed by the global longitudinal strain of -15.8%, which falls below the normal threshold of -20% 1, 2
  • This discordance between preserved LVEF and reduced GLS is characteristic of patients with concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, where circumferential shortening compensates for impaired longitudinal function to maintain pump function 2, 3

Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Analysis

  • Mild concentric LVH is present with interventricular septum 1.0 cm and posterior wall 1.2 cm in diastole 1
  • LV mass calculated at 207-222 grams (indexed 87.7 g/m²) confirms mild hypertrophy 1
  • The IVS/LVPW ratio of 0.85 indicates symmetric (concentric) hypertrophy pattern 1
  • Concentric hypertrophy geometry is a significant independent predictor of impaired GLS (odds ratio 22.4) even when LVEF appears normal 2

Clinical Significance of Reduced GLS

  • GLS of -15.8% indicates subclinical myocardial dysfunction that precedes decline in ejection fraction and predicts progression to overt heart failure 1, 4, 5
  • In hypertensive patients with concentric LVH and preserved LVEF, approximately 13% progress to systolic dysfunction over 3 years of follow-up 6
  • The reduced GLS reflects early myocardial fibrosis and impaired longitudinal fiber function despite preserved circumferential shortening 1, 3

Diastolic Function Assessment

  • Left ventricular filling pattern is reported as normal 1
  • Mitral E velocity 82.8 cm/s, A velocity 60.8 cm/s, yielding E/A ratio of 1.4 1
  • Lateral e' velocity 13.8 cm/s and medial e' velocity 12.8 cm/s are preserved 1
  • Average E/e' ratio would be approximately 6.2, indicating normal left ventricular filling pressures 1
  • However, the presence of concentric LVH with reduced GLS suggests early diastolic dysfunction may develop despite currently normal parameters 5, 3

Right Heart and Pulmonary Pressures

  • Right ventricular size and function are normal with TAPSE 3.0 cm (normal ≥1.7 cm) 1
  • Estimated right ventricular systolic pressure is 33.2 mmHg (derived from TR velocity 2.74 m/s plus estimated RA pressure 3 mmHg), which is normal 1
  • Right atrial area 20.9 cm² is within normal limits 1

Valvular Function Summary

  • Mitral valve: Trace mitral regurgitation, which is physiologic and requires no intervention 1
  • Tricuspid valve: Trace tricuspid regurgitation, which is physiologic 1
  • Pulmonic valve: Normal structure and function without stenosis or regurgitation 1

Critical Management Implications

Immediate Priorities

  • Aggressive blood pressure control is mandatory with target <130/80 mmHg to prevent progression of LVH and further GLS deterioration 5
  • Uncontrolled hypertension increases risk of GLS decline by 3.55-fold in patients with LVH 5
  • Weight reduction is essential given BMI 31.3 kg/m²; obesity is independently associated with reduced GLS (odds ratio 2.01) and progression to systolic dysfunction 5

Cardiovascular Risk Factor Optimization

  • Screen for and aggressively treat diabetes mellitus, as diabetes increases risk of GLS decline by 2.21-fold in hypertensive patients with LVH 5
  • Evaluate and treat dyslipidemia, which increases risk of reduced GLS by 2.16-fold 5
  • Assess renal function, as renal impairment increases risk of GLS decline by 4.27-fold 5

Surveillance Strategy

  • Repeat echocardiography in 6-12 months to monitor for progression of LVH or further GLS deterioration 1
  • Serial GLS measurements are more reproducible than LVEF for detecting early changes in myocardial function 1
  • Monitor for development of symptoms (dyspnea, reduced exercise tolerance, chest pain) that would indicate progression to symptomatic heart failure 1

Risk Factors for Progression to Systolic Dysfunction

  • QRS duration >120 ms on ECG increases risk of progression to systolic dysfunction by 2-fold 6
  • Elevated arterial impedance >4.0 mmHg/ml/m² increases risk by 2-fold 6
  • Presence of both factors increases risk by >4-fold 6
  • Interval myocardial infarction is the strongest predictor (present in 43% of patients who develop systolic dysfunction) 6

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not be falsely reassured by the normal ejection fraction of 61%; the reduced GLS of -15.8% indicates early myocardial dysfunction requiring intervention 1, 2
  • Do not attribute the concentric LVH solely to "normal aging"; this represents pathologic remodeling requiring aggressive risk factor modification 5, 6
  • Do not delay intervention until symptoms develop or LVEF declines, as myocardial fibrosis may become irreversible 1, 6

Related Questions

What is the overall assessment of cardiac function given normal Left Ventricular (LV) systolic function, normal Left Ventricular (LV) diastolic filling pressure, and normal Right Ventricular (RV) systolic function?
What is the most likely diagnosis for an elderly patient with exertional dyspnea, orthopnea, and signs of heart failure, with echocardiography showing concentric left ventricular hypertrophy and a normal ejection fraction (EF) of 60%?
Will Mild Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) of the mitral valve and Borderline Concentric Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (CLVH) progress or resolve spontaneously in a 20-year-old male patient with normal cholesterol levels and no symptoms, and are these findings related to Erectile Dysfunction (ED) or caused by anxiety and stress?
What are the causes and associated ECG changes of concentric and eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)?
What is the best management plan for an elderly female patient with mild concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, normal left ventricular systolic function, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 50-55%, Grade I diastolic dysfunction, and valvular abnormalities, including mild valvular aortic stenosis and regurgitation?
What is the normal external auditory canal volume in a healthy adult?
What are the functions and clinical significance of the sat gene versus the satF gene in Escherichia coli?
With normal fasting glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), is any pharmacologic treatment or further evaluation required?
Does restless legs syndrome cause balance problems or true leg weakness?
What interventions are indicated for a patient with a random cortisol of 5 µg/dL?
How should I manage persistent hyperphosphatemia in a peritoneal dialysis patient?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.