Echocardiogram Interpretation: Structurally Normal Heart with Subclinical Myocardial Dysfunction
This echocardiogram reveals a structurally normal heart with preserved ejection fraction (61%) but demonstrates subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction evidenced by borderline-reduced global longitudinal strain (-15.8%) in the setting of mild concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, likely related to the patient's obesity (BMI 31.3 kg/m²) and requiring aggressive cardiovascular risk factor modification to prevent progression to overt heart failure. 1, 2
Aortic Valve Assessment
- The aortic valve is trileaflet with normal structure and function, showing no evidence of stenosis or regurgitation 1
- Peak aortic velocity is 1.37 m/s with mean gradient of 4.2 mmHg, well below thresholds for any degree of stenosis (severe AS requires mean gradient ≥40 mmHg or peak velocity ≥4 m/s) 1
- Calculated aortic valve area by continuity equation is 3.0-3.1 cm² (indexed 1.3 cm²/m²), confirming no stenosis (severe AS defined as <1.0 cm² or <0.6 cm²/m²) 1
- The aortic root diameter is 3.1 cm, which is normal for body size 1
Left Ventricular Structure and Systolic Function
Concerning Finding: Discordance Between Ejection Fraction and Strain
- The ejection fraction of 61% appears reassuring but masks early myocardial dysfunction revealed by the global longitudinal strain of -15.8%, which falls below the normal threshold of -20% 1, 2
- This discordance between preserved LVEF and reduced GLS is characteristic of patients with concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, where circumferential shortening compensates for impaired longitudinal function to maintain pump function 2, 3
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Analysis
- Mild concentric LVH is present with interventricular septum 1.0 cm and posterior wall 1.2 cm in diastole 1
- LV mass calculated at 207-222 grams (indexed 87.7 g/m²) confirms mild hypertrophy 1
- The IVS/LVPW ratio of 0.85 indicates symmetric (concentric) hypertrophy pattern 1
- Concentric hypertrophy geometry is a significant independent predictor of impaired GLS (odds ratio 22.4) even when LVEF appears normal 2
Clinical Significance of Reduced GLS
- GLS of -15.8% indicates subclinical myocardial dysfunction that precedes decline in ejection fraction and predicts progression to overt heart failure 1, 4, 5
- In hypertensive patients with concentric LVH and preserved LVEF, approximately 13% progress to systolic dysfunction over 3 years of follow-up 6
- The reduced GLS reflects early myocardial fibrosis and impaired longitudinal fiber function despite preserved circumferential shortening 1, 3
Diastolic Function Assessment
- Left ventricular filling pattern is reported as normal 1
- Mitral E velocity 82.8 cm/s, A velocity 60.8 cm/s, yielding E/A ratio of 1.4 1
- Lateral e' velocity 13.8 cm/s and medial e' velocity 12.8 cm/s are preserved 1
- Average E/e' ratio would be approximately 6.2, indicating normal left ventricular filling pressures 1
- However, the presence of concentric LVH with reduced GLS suggests early diastolic dysfunction may develop despite currently normal parameters 5, 3
Right Heart and Pulmonary Pressures
- Right ventricular size and function are normal with TAPSE 3.0 cm (normal ≥1.7 cm) 1
- Estimated right ventricular systolic pressure is 33.2 mmHg (derived from TR velocity 2.74 m/s plus estimated RA pressure 3 mmHg), which is normal 1
- Right atrial area 20.9 cm² is within normal limits 1
Valvular Function Summary
- Mitral valve: Trace mitral regurgitation, which is physiologic and requires no intervention 1
- Tricuspid valve: Trace tricuspid regurgitation, which is physiologic 1
- Pulmonic valve: Normal structure and function without stenosis or regurgitation 1
Critical Management Implications
Immediate Priorities
- Aggressive blood pressure control is mandatory with target <130/80 mmHg to prevent progression of LVH and further GLS deterioration 5
- Uncontrolled hypertension increases risk of GLS decline by 3.55-fold in patients with LVH 5
- Weight reduction is essential given BMI 31.3 kg/m²; obesity is independently associated with reduced GLS (odds ratio 2.01) and progression to systolic dysfunction 5
Cardiovascular Risk Factor Optimization
- Screen for and aggressively treat diabetes mellitus, as diabetes increases risk of GLS decline by 2.21-fold in hypertensive patients with LVH 5
- Evaluate and treat dyslipidemia, which increases risk of reduced GLS by 2.16-fold 5
- Assess renal function, as renal impairment increases risk of GLS decline by 4.27-fold 5
Surveillance Strategy
- Repeat echocardiography in 6-12 months to monitor for progression of LVH or further GLS deterioration 1
- Serial GLS measurements are more reproducible than LVEF for detecting early changes in myocardial function 1
- Monitor for development of symptoms (dyspnea, reduced exercise tolerance, chest pain) that would indicate progression to symptomatic heart failure 1
Risk Factors for Progression to Systolic Dysfunction
- QRS duration >120 ms on ECG increases risk of progression to systolic dysfunction by 2-fold 6
- Elevated arterial impedance >4.0 mmHg/ml/m² increases risk by 2-fold 6
- Presence of both factors increases risk by >4-fold 6
- Interval myocardial infarction is the strongest predictor (present in 43% of patients who develop systolic dysfunction) 6
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not be falsely reassured by the normal ejection fraction of 61%; the reduced GLS of -15.8% indicates early myocardial dysfunction requiring intervention 1, 2
- Do not attribute the concentric LVH solely to "normal aging"; this represents pathologic remodeling requiring aggressive risk factor modification 5, 6
- Do not delay intervention until symptoms develop or LVEF declines, as myocardial fibrosis may become irreversible 1, 6