What is the current worldwide trend in carbapenem resistance rates among uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Carbapenem Resistance in UPEC: Current Global Trends

Carbapenem resistance in uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) is emerging as a critical global threat, with recent surveillance showing resistance rates ranging from approximately 10-15% in hospital settings, driven predominantly by NDM-5 and OXA-48 carbapenemase genes, particularly in high-risk clones ST405 and ST167.

Geographic Variation and Resistance Rates

The current landscape of carbapenem resistance in UPEC shows significant geographic heterogeneity:

  • Pakistan (2023-2024): Among 1,100 hospitalized patients, 118 carbapenem-resistant UPEC isolates were identified, with ST405 (35.6%) and ST167 (21.2%) being the predominant sequence types carrying blaCTX-M-15 and blaNDM-5 genes 1.

  • China (2017-2020): In Shandong Province, 17 carbapenem-resistant UPEC isolates were collected from hospitalized patients, with 88% (15/17) being blaNDM producers, and ST167 being the most common sequence type 2.

  • Iraq: Among outpatient phylogroup B2 UPEC isolates, carbapenemase genes were detected in 76.3% of isolates, though phenotypic carbapenem resistance rates remained relatively low, with blaOXA-48 being most frequent (57.8%) 3.

  • Iran (2018): All tested UPEC isolates were negative for carbapenemases by both phenotypic and molecular methods, indicating regional variation in resistance patterns 4.

Molecular Mechanisms Driving Resistance

The predominant carbapenemase genes identified in recent surveillance include:

  • blaNDM-5: The most clinically significant mechanism, particularly prevalent in Asian hospital settings, with high transferability via conjugative plasmids 1, 2.

  • blaOXA-48: Frequently detected in Middle Eastern isolates, often co-occurring with other resistance genes 3.

  • Co-production patterns: Multiple carbapenemase genes are increasingly found in single isolates, with blaOXA-48 and blaPER combinations being common (41.1% of carbapenemase producers) 3.

High-Risk Clones and Transmission

Specific sequence types represent globally disseminated high-risk clones:

  • ST405 and ST167: These clones carry extensive antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, and sulfonamides, in addition to carbapenem resistance 1.

  • ST410: An emerging clone identified in Chinese surveillance with carbapenem resistance 2.

  • Transferability: Approximately 27% (4/15) of blaNDM-producing isolates demonstrated the ability to transfer resistance genes to recipient E. coli cells, indicating high horizontal gene transfer potential 2.

Associated Multidrug Resistance Patterns

Carbapenem-resistant UPEC universally exhibit extensive multidrug resistance:

  • Near-universal resistance to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (96.6%) and doxycycline (96.6%) in carbapenem-resistant isolates 1.

  • 100% MDR rates among carbapenemase-producing phylogroup B2 isolates 3.

  • Preserved susceptibility: Colistin and tigecycline maintain 100% susceptibility against carbapenem-resistant UPEC, with relatively low resistance to aminoglycosides and nitrofurantoin 1, 3.

Critical Clinical Pitfalls

The most concerning trend is the emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (mcr-1) in carbapenem-resistant isolates, creating pan-resistant strains with extremely limited treatment options 2.

Additional concerns include:

  • Biofilm formation: Carbapenem-resistant UPEC frequently produce biofilms, contributing to persistence and treatment failure 2, 4.

  • High virulence: Carbapenem-resistant clones carry diverse virulence factors, making infections more severe and difficult to treat 1.

  • Hospital amplification: The concentration of carbapenem-resistant UPEC in hospital settings creates reservoirs for further dissemination 1, 2.

Treatment Implications

Current evidence indicates carbapenem overreliance has accelerated resistance dissemination, necessitating alternative strategies including novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, cefiderocol, and for metallo-β-lactamase producers, ceftazidime-avibactam combined with aztreonam 5.

Related Questions

What is the recommended management of multidrug‑resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli urinary tract infection?
What is the initial approach to treating patients diagnosed with multidrug-resistant Urinary Pathogen Escherichia coli (UPEC)?
How should a urinary tract infection caused by non‑lactose‑fermenting, non‑haemolytic uropathogenic Escherichia coli be managed given its higher multidrug resistance?
What is the global prevalence of multidrug‑resistant (MDR) and extensively drug‑resistant (XDR) uropathogenic Escherichia coli and the recommended empiric treatment options?
What is the treatment for urinary tract infections caused by UPEC (Uropathogenic Escherichia coli) that produce hemolysins?
What baseline laboratory tests (complete blood count with differential, basic metabolic panel, fasting glucose or hemoglobin A1c, lipid profile, liver function tests, electrocardiogram) and monitoring schedule are recommended for a patient initiating clozapine therapy?
What is the first‑line treatment for Candida (fungal) diaper rash in a 1‑year‑old infant?
How should I treat a reproductive‑age woman with typical primary dysmenorrhea and no red‑flag features?
Can omeprazole be used as the proton‑pump inhibitor in a first‑line Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen?
Which antipsychotic medications are most strongly associated with increased serum prolactin levels?
What is the recommended management for a patient with acute decompensated heart failure, reduced ejection fraction (≤35%), volume overload, pulmonary congestion, and elevated blood pressure?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.