What is the appropriate evaluation, imaging, and management for a patient presenting with back and hip pain after a fall?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 12, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Evaluation and Management of Back and Hip Pain After a Fall

Initial Imaging Protocol

Obtain an anteroposterior (AP) view of the pelvis with a cross-table lateral view of the symptomatic hip immediately as your first-line imaging. 1, 2 This combined approach is critical because patients with suspected hip fractures frequently have concomitant pelvic fractures (including sacrum and pubic rami), and the pelvis view allows comparison with the contralateral side for accurate diagnosis. 2

Key imaging specifications:

  • AP pelvis view: Position with approximately 15 degrees of internal hip rotation 2
  • Cross-table lateral view: Of the symptomatic hip to provide orthogonal views 2
  • Rationale: Radiographs identify approximately 90% of proximal femoral fractures, but 10% remain occult on initial imaging 1, 2

When Initial Radiographs Are Negative

If radiographs are negative but clinical suspicion remains high, proceed directly to MRI of the pelvis and affected hip without IV contrast. 1, 2 This is non-negotiable for ruling out occult fractures.

Why MRI is superior:

  • Sensitivity: 99-100% for proximal femoral fractures versus CT's significantly lower accuracy 2
  • Additional diagnostic value: Detects concomitant pelvic fractures (38% of cases), soft tissue injuries, and accurately characterizes fracture morphology to guide surgical versus conservative management 1, 2
  • Clinical impact: A negative MRI allows confident discharge from the emergency department, while rapid diagnosis reduces surgical delays beyond 12 hours, which significantly increases 30-day mortality risk 2

CT is explicitly inferior:

  • Use CT only as a problem-solving modality after fracture identification on radiographs when you need better characterization of fracture morphology for surgical planning 1, 2
  • CT limitations: Not as sensitive as MRI, with significant diagnostic failures and high inter-observer variability 2
  • Limited advantages: Faster acquisition and usability in patients with severe confusion or MRI contraindications 2

Clinical Presentation Pitfalls

High-risk presentations requiring imaging even without classic findings:

  • Atypical pain patterns: Patients may present with only vague buttock, knee, thigh, groin, or back pain without localized hip pain 3
  • Preserved ambulation: Some patients with hip fractures can still walk, making diagnosis challenging 3
  • Vertebral compression fractures: Back pain after a fall may represent vertebral compression fracture, particularly if pain radiates to flanks (66% of cases) or occurs spontaneously in bed (30% of cases) 4

Red flags demanding immediate advanced imaging:

  • Age >65 years with nonspecific leg discomfort and difficulty bearing weight, even without documented trauma 3
  • Worsening pain over 2-3 days after initial negative radiographs—this pattern was demonstrated in AAOS case studies where MRI revealed displaced basicervical femoral neck fractures 1
  • Pain with internal/external hip rotation on examination, even with negative initial radiographs 1

Diagnostic Algorithm for Back Pain Component

For isolated back pain after a fall, obtain thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs initially. 4 If negative but clinical suspicion persists:

  • MRI spine without contrast is the modality of choice to determine if vertebral compression fracture is acute versus chronic and to evaluate for malignant causes or neurological compromise 5
  • Bone scanning may be necessary if immediate radiographs are normal, though this has largely been replaced by MRI 4
  • Common mistake: Pain location and fracture site may not coincide—certain vertebrae (T8, T12, L1, L4) are more likely to fracture 4

Critical Timing Considerations

Delays in diagnosis and treatment are associated with increased mortality, complication rates, length of hospital stay, and costs. 2, 6 Specifically:

  • Surgical delays >12 hours significantly increase 30-day mortality risk in hip fracture patients over 50 years 6
  • Diagnostic delays averaged 4.5 days in one study when vertebral compression fractures were missed initially 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never rely solely on hip radiographs without pelvis views—you will miss associated pelvic fractures that alter treatment decisions 2
  • Never use ultrasound as primary imaging for hip fracture detection—it has only 65% specificity despite 100% sensitivity for joint effusion 1, 7
  • Never assume negative radiographs exclude fracture in high-risk patients—proceed to MRI without delay 2
  • Never order bone scan as second-line imaging when MRI is available—bone scans can be falsely negative for up to 72 hours and have been superseded by MRI 1

Management Priorities

Immediate actions while awaiting imaging:

  • Immobilize in position found to reduce pain and prevent further injury 6
  • Multimodal analgesia: Regular IV acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and opioids as needed with regular pain reassessment 6
  • Assess for vascular compromise immediately—blue, purple, or pale extremity requires emergency activation 6

Post-diagnosis management:

  • Hip fractures: Surgical intervention within 12 hours when indicated, with VTE prophylaxis for 4 weeks postoperatively (moderate to strong evidence) 1
  • Vertebral compression fractures: Acetaminophen, NSAIDs, narcotics, calcitonin, limited bed rest, bracing, physical therapy; consider vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty for inadequate pain relief 8, 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Imaging for Suspected Hip Fractures

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Hip fractures in adults.

American family physician, 2003

Research

Diagnosis and Management of Vertebral Compression Fracture.

The American journal of medicine, 2022

Guideline

Management of Acute on Chronic Hip Pain

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Acute Hip Hematoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

What's the next step in managing a patient with a mild compression fracture of the mid-thoracic vertebral body, particularly in elderly patients or those with osteoporosis?
Are compression fractures a serious concern?
What is the most appropriate physical activity for a 52-year-old gentleman with a compression fracture of L3 and a Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan T score of -1.5, indicating osteoporosis?
What is the best course of management for an elderly male patient with a new wedge-shaped compression fracture of the T6 vertebral body, likely due to osteoporosis?
What is the most appropriate treatment option for a patient with severe pain from an acute T12 vertebral compression fracture, who has failed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen, and has no neurologic deficits?
What alternative antibiotics can be used for a patient with a confirmed penicillin (amoxicillin) allergy for common infections such as community‑acquired respiratory infections, skin and soft‑tissue infections, urinary‑tract infections, otitis media, meningitis, and dental infections?
What is the recommended management for a generally healthy 17‑month‑old child with confirmed mild COVID‑19 (fever, rhinorrhea, cough, mild gastrointestinal symptoms, oxygen saturation ≥94% on room air)?
Can dapagliflozin and linagliptin be used together in a patient with type 2 diabetes, and what are the recommended doses and safety considerations?
How should recurrent cellulitis be managed in an elderly diabetic patient with a history of methicillin‑resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection?
Does olmesartan contain lactose or other dairy-derived allergens in its tablet core or coating?
What is the appropriate dosing and safety considerations for tropisetron in an adult without cardiac disease, including dose adjustments for severe hepatic or renal impairment and contraindications?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.