Next Pharmacologic Treatment After Failed Lisdexamfetamine and Methylphenidate (Foquest)
Trial an alternative amphetamine formulation (mixed amphetamine salts or dextroamphetamine) as the next step, because approximately 40% of patients respond to only one stimulant class despite failing another, and you have only tried one amphetamine formulation (lisdexamfetamine) so far. 1, 2
Treatment Algorithm for Stimulant-Refractory ADHD
Step 1: Verify Adequate Stimulant Optimization
Before abandoning stimulants entirely, confirm that both medications were properly dosed:
- Methylphenidate (Foquest) 85 mg is within the therapeutic range (maximum 60 mg for most formulations, though some extended-release can go higher) 1
- Lisdexamfetamine 50 mg should ideally be titrated to 70 mg maximum before declaring failure 2, 3
- If lisdexamfetamine was not pushed to 70 mg, increase the dose first before switching 2
Step 2: Trial Alternative Amphetamine Formulation
Individual response to methylphenidate versus amphetamines is idiosyncratic: roughly 40% respond to both classes, 40% respond to only one class, and 20% respond to neither. 1, 2
Since you have tried:
- Methylphenidate (Foquest) = methylphenidate class ✓
- Lisdexamfetamine = amphetamine class (prodrug) ✓
Try mixed amphetamine salts (Adderall/Adderall XR) or dextroamphetamine next:
- Start Adderall XR 10 mg once daily, titrate by 5 mg weekly up to 40-50 mg maximum 4
- Lisdexamfetamine's prodrug mechanism may have limited its effectiveness compared to immediate amphetamine delivery 3, 5
- The enzymatic conversion required for lisdexamfetamine creates delayed onset that some patients do not tolerate as well 3, 5
Step 3: If All Stimulants Fail, Switch to Non-Stimulants
Atomoxetine is the strongest evidence-based non-stimulant option after stimulant failure, though it requires 6-12 weeks to achieve full therapeutic effect compared to stimulants which work within days. 2
Atomoxetine dosing:
- Start 40 mg daily for adults 2
- Titrate to target dose of 60-100 mg daily (maximum 1.4 mg/kg/day or 100 mg/day, whichever is lower) 2
- Median time to response is 3.7 weeks, but improvement may continue up to 52 weeks 2
- Effect size approximately 0.7 compared to stimulants at 1.0 2
Alternative non-stimulants if atomoxetine fails:
- Extended-release guanfacine (1-4 mg daily) – allow 2-4 weeks for effect 2
- Extended-release clonidine – allow 2-4 weeks for effect 2
- Bupropion – medium-range effect size, but activating and can worsen anxiety 2
Critical Monitoring Parameters
For atomoxetine:
- Monitor blood pressure, heart rate, suicidal ideation (especially first few months), and hepatic function 2
- FDA black box warning for increased suicidal ideation in children/adolescents 2
- Most common adverse effects are somnolence and fatigue 2
For alpha-2 agonists (guanfacine/clonidine):
- Monitor blood pressure and sedation, particularly when initiating 2
For bupropion:
- Monitor seizure risk factors, anxiety/agitation worsening, and blood pressure 2
- Contraindicated with MAO inhibitors (14-day washout required) 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assume all amphetamines are equivalent – lisdexamfetamine's prodrug mechanism creates a fundamentally different pharmacokinetic profile than immediate amphetamine formulations 3, 5
- Do not skip to non-stimulants prematurely – 70-80% of patients respond to stimulants when properly titrated, and you have only tried two of three major stimulant options 1, 2
- Do not expect atomoxetine to work as quickly as stimulants – it requires 6-12 weeks for full effect versus days for stimulants 2
- Do not use bupropion as first-line non-stimulant – atomoxetine has stronger evidence and FDA approval for adult ADHD 2
Evidence Quality Considerations
The recommendation to trial alternative amphetamine formulations is based on Level A evidence showing that 40% of patients respond to only one stimulant class despite failing another 1, 2. The head-to-head trial comparing lisdexamfetamine to atomoxetine in methylphenidate non-responders showed lisdexamfetamine's superiority (median time to response 12 days vs 21 days, 81.7% vs 63.6% response rate), supporting the strategy of exhausting stimulant options before switching to non-stimulants 6.