What are the clinical implications of over-referring children with high astigmatism detected by Spot (Autorefractor)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Over-referring children with high astigmatism detected by Spot vision screeners can lead to unnecessary healthcare utilization and parental anxiety, and clinicians should consider implementing higher referral thresholds for astigmatism (>2.50 or 3.00 diopters) to reduce false positive referrals while still identifying clinically significant refractive errors. According to the most recent evidence from 1, early detection and treatment of amblyopia and amblyogenic risk factors, including significant refractive error, can improve visual acuity. However, the tendency of automated screeners to overestimate astigmatism, particularly in young children, should be taken into account when interpreting screening results.

When astigmatism is the only abnormality detected, and especially if it's between 1.50-2.50 diopters, consider repeating the screening or implementing a monitoring approach rather than immediate referral, as suggested by expert opinion and guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics, as mentioned in 1. This balanced approach ensures children with truly significant refractive errors receive timely care while preventing unnecessary specialist visits for those with mild astigmatism that may not impact visual development or require correction. Key considerations include:

  • The potential for successful treatment of amblyopia is greatest in young children, although improvement in visual acuity can reasonably be expected in older children and teenagers, as noted in 1
  • Children with risk factors for amblyopia should have at least one comprehensive ophthalmic examination, generally when the risk factor is identified, as recommended in 1
  • The goal is to optimize vision screening efficiency while maintaining sensitivity for detecting amblyogenic risk factors, and clinicians should prioritize referral thresholds that balance these competing demands, based on the latest evidence from 1.

From the Research

Clinical Implications of Over-Referring Children with High Astigmatism

  • The clinical implications of over-referring children with high astigmatism detected by Spot are not directly addressed in the provided studies 2, 3.
  • However, it is known that astigmatism can cause deterioration of the retinal image and affect vision quality 2.
  • High degrees of astigmatism in childhood typically decrease with emmetropization, but the prevalence of astigmatism increases with age 2.
  • Uncorrected astigmatism can decrease patients' vision-related quality of life, decrease productivity among working-age adults, and pose an economic burden on patients and their families 3.
  • Astigmatic patients may experience decreased vision quality, increased glare, haloes, night-time driving difficulties, falls, and spectacle dependence 3.
  • The provided studies do not specifically discuss the implications of over-referring children with high astigmatism, but they highlight the importance of understanding and addressing astigmatism to maintain and improve visual function 2, 3.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Epidemiology and Burden of Astigmatism: A Systematic Literature Review.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.