What are the differences between the glucagon‑like peptide‑1 (GLP‑1) receptor agonists used for weight loss—liraglutide (Saxenda), semaglutide (Wegovy), tirzepatide (Mounjaro), dulaglutide (Trulicity), and exenatide (Byetta)—in terms of dosing schedule, expected weight loss, potency, and safety profile?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 12, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differences Between GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Loss

Tirzepatide (Mounjaro/Zepbound) achieves the greatest weight loss at 20.9%, followed by semaglutide 2.4mg (Wegovy) at 14.9%, then liraglutide 3.0mg (Saxenda) at 5.2-6.1%, while dulaglutide (Trulicity) and exenatide (Byetta) are not FDA-approved for weight loss and produce substantially less weight reduction. 1

Weight Loss Efficacy Comparison

Tirzepatide demonstrates superior weight loss compared to all other GLP-1 receptor agonists, achieving 20.9% total body weight loss at 72 weeks with the 15mg dose, representing a 6% absolute advantage over semaglutide 2.4mg 1, 2. Approximately 40% of patients on tirzepatide 15mg achieve ≥25% weight loss 1.

Semaglutide 2.4mg (Wegovy) produces 14.9% weight loss at 68 weeks, with 64.9% of patients achieving ≥10% weight loss 1, 3. This represents substantially greater efficacy than lower-dose semaglutide formulations or other GLP-1 agonists 1.

Liraglutide 3.0mg (Saxenda) achieves mean weight loss of 5.24-6.1% 1, 3, which is significantly less than semaglutide or tirzepatide but still clinically meaningful 1.

Dulaglutide (Trulicity) produces approximately 4.03kg mean weight loss 2 but is not FDA-approved for obesity management and should only be used off-label when other options are unavailable 1.

Exenatide (Byetta) demonstrates the least weight loss at approximately 1.9kg 2 and is not recommended for weight management as a primary indication 1.

Mechanism of Action Differences

Tirzepatide is fundamentally different because it is a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, not a pure GLP-1 agonist 1. This dual activation provides enhanced metabolic benefits including delayed gastric emptying, suppressed appetite, improved insulin secretion, and increased energy expenditure compared to single-receptor activation 1, 4. The synergistic effect of GIP and GLP-1 receptor co-activation explains tirzepatide's superior weight loss 4.

All other agents (semaglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide) are selective GLP-1 receptor agonists that work through hypothalamic appetite suppression, delayed gastric emptying, and glucose-dependent insulin release 1.

Dosing Schedule

Once-weekly injections:

  • Tirzepatide: 5mg starting dose, titrated to 10mg or 15mg weekly 1
  • Semaglutide 2.4mg: 0.25mg starting dose, titrated over 16 weeks to 2.4mg weekly 1
  • Dulaglutide: 0.75mg starting dose, can increase to 1.5mg weekly 1

Daily injection:

  • Liraglutide 3.0mg: Daily subcutaneous injection 1

Twice-daily injection:

  • Exenatide (Byetta): Twice-daily dosing, though a once-weekly formulation exists 1

Potency and Glycemic Control

For patients with type 2 diabetes, tirzepatide produces HbA1c reductions of 1.87-2.59%, superior to semaglutide's 1.36-1.48% reduction 1, 3. Liraglutide 1.8mg reduces HbA1c by approximately 1.23% 3.

Weight loss is consistently greater in non-diabetic patients (6.1-17.4%) compared to those with diabetes (4-6.2%), suggesting metabolic factors influence treatment response 1.

Safety Profile Comparison

Gastrointestinal adverse effects are the most common across all agents, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation 1. However, incidence varies by agent:

  • Nausea: Tirzepatide 17-22%, Semaglutide 18-40%, Liraglutide approximately 40% 1, 3
  • Vomiting: Tirzepatide 6-10%, Semaglutide 8-16%, Liraglutide approximately 16% 1, 3
  • Diarrhea: Tirzepatide 13-16%, Semaglutide 12% 1

Serious adverse events include pancreatitis and gallbladder disease (cholelithiasis, cholecystitis) for all agents, though causality has not been definitively established 1. Semaglutide shows 38% higher serious adverse event rates compared to placebo 1.

All GLP-1 receptor agonists share identical contraindications: personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN2) 1.

Hypoglycemia risk is minimal when used as monotherapy for all agents, but increases when combined with insulin or sulfonylureas 1.

Cardiovascular Benefits

Semaglutide 2.4mg has proven cardiovascular benefit, reducing cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke by 20% (HR 0.80) in patients with established cardiovascular disease and BMI ≥27, even without diabetes 1. This makes semaglutide the preferred choice for patients with obesity and cardiovascular disease 1.

Tirzepatide shows favorable cardiovascular safety trends but does not yet have proven cardiovascular outcome benefits like semaglutide 1.

Liraglutide, dulaglutide, and exenatide have cardiovascular data in diabetic populations but not specifically for obesity management 1.

Cost Considerations

All agents are expensive, with average wholesale prices of approximately $1,272-$1,619 per 30-day supply 1. Tirzepatide costs approximately $1,272 per month, while semaglutide costs approximately $1,557-$1,619 per month 1. Insurance authorization may be challenging, particularly for obesity management without diabetes 1.

Clinical Decision Algorithm

For maximum weight loss as primary goal: Tirzepatide 15mg weekly is the first choice, achieving 20.9% weight loss 1.

For patients with established cardiovascular disease: Semaglutide 2.4mg weekly is preferred due to proven 20% cardiovascular risk reduction 1.

For patients who cannot tolerate weekly injections: Liraglutide 3.0mg daily is an alternative, though with substantially less weight loss (5.2-6.1%) 1.

Dulaglutide and exenatide should not be used as primary weight loss agents, as they are not FDA-approved for obesity management and produce minimal weight reduction 1, 2.

Critical Implementation Points

Slow titration is essential for all agents to minimize gastrointestinal side effects, with dose escalation every 4 weeks 1. Starting at maintenance doses dramatically increases adverse events and discontinuation rates 1.

All agents must be combined with a reduced-calorie diet (500-kcal deficit) and minimum 150 minutes per week of physical activity 1.

Treatment response should be evaluated at 12-16 weeks on maximum tolerated dose; discontinue if <5% weight loss after 3 months, as early non-responders are unlikely to benefit 1.

Lifelong treatment is typically necessary to maintain weight loss, as discontinuation results in regain of one-half to two-thirds of lost weight within 1 year 1.

Related Questions

What are the guidelines for using GLP-1 (Glucagon-like peptide-1) agonists, such as liraglutide (Saxenda) (liraglutide) or semaglutide (Wegovy) (semaglutide), for weight loss in adults with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher, or 27 or higher with at least one weight-related condition?
How long have GLP-1 (Glucagon-like peptide-1) receptor agonist weight loss drugs, such as semaglutide (semaglutide) and liraglutide (liraglutide), been available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in adults with a history of obesity?
Is weight loss with GLP-1 (Glucagon-like peptide-1) receptor agonists, such as semaglutide (semaglutide) and liraglutide (liraglutide), primarily due to appetite suppression?
What are the safety considerations for using Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, such as liraglutide (Victoza) or semaglutide (Ozempic), for obesity treatment in Asian patients?
Is there evidence to support requiring a 6-month weight management program before initiating a GLP-1 (Glucagon-Like Peptide-1) agonist, such as liraglutide (Victoza) or semaglutide (Ozempic), in patients with obesity and hypertension?
Does weight loss improve obstructive sleep apnea in overweight or obese patients?
How should I evaluate and manage a red rash in my infant?
What is the appropriate migraine prophylaxis for a young woman of child‑bearing age with recurrent migraines, considering safety, weight impact, and teratogenic risk?
When can polycythemia be diagnosed in a female—what hemoglobin or hematocrit thresholds and exclusion criteria are required?
What empiric antibiotic regimen (including dosing, coverage, alternatives, and duration) is recommended for an otherwise healthy adult with an open knee wound and no known MRSA colonisation?
What is the appropriate management for a patient with acute pancreatitis complicated by ascites and bilateral pleural effusions?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.