In a pregnant woman with a positive rubella IgG test performed six months ago, what is the risk of acquiring rubella?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 12, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risk of Rubella Infection with Positive IgG from 6 Months Ago

If you had a positive rubella IgG test 6 months ago, your risk of acquiring rubella infection is essentially zero—you are immune and protected. 1

Understanding Your Immunity Status

Laboratory evidence of rubella IgG antibody is considered reliable proof of immunity to rubella. 1 This means:

  • Any antibody level above the standard positive cutoff value of the assay is considered evidence of immunity 1
  • Postinfection immunity to rubella appears to be long-lasting and is probably lifelong 1
  • Your positive IgG from 6 months ago indicates you are protected against rubella infection 1

Duration of Protection

Vaccine-induced and natural immunity provide long-term, probably lifelong protection. 1 The evidence shows:

  • Available follow-up studies indicate that vaccine-induced protection is long-term, probably lifelong 1
  • Clinical efficacy studies demonstrate that greater than 90% of vaccinees maintain protection against both clinical rubella and viremia for at least 15 years 1
  • Although data from several studies indicate that levels of vaccine-induced rubella antibodies may decline with time, surveillance data suggest that waning immunity with increased susceptibility to rubella disease does not occur 1

What About Reinfection?

While reinfection can theoretically occur, it is extremely rare and clinically insignificant. 1 Key points:

  • Re-exposure to natural rubella occasionally leads to reinfection without clinical illness or detectable viremia 1
  • The risk for congenital rubella syndrome among infants born to women reinfected with rubella during pregnancy is minimal 1
  • Reinfection occurs without symptoms and does not pose a meaningful risk 1

Important Caveats

Your positive IgG result from 6 months ago remains valid evidence of immunity—no repeat testing is needed. 1 However:

  • Clinical diagnosis of rubella is unreliable and should not be considered in assessing immune status—only laboratory evidence of IgG antibody is reliable 1
  • If you were pregnant and had an "equivocal" result (not clearly positive), you would be considered susceptible 1
  • The only reliable evidence of immunity is the presence of serum rubella IgG antibody above the positive cutoff 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Related Questions

What does a positive result for measles (rubeola) Immunoglobulin G (IgG), rubella IgG, and mumps Antibody (AB) IgG indicate?
Is avidity testing for Rubella (German measles) valid during pregnancy, especially in a woman with a history of rubella exposure?
What is the management for a patient with a positive Rubella (German Measles) Immunoglobulin G (IgG) result?
What does the presence of Rubella (German measles) IgM (Immunoglobulin M) antibodies indicate in a patient with a history of previous Rubella infection or immunization, as evidenced by IgG (Immunoglobulin G) antibodies?
What are the implications and management of a patient with a positive Rubella (German measles) virus Immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody test?
What are the indications, recommended dosing, and treatment duration of enoxaparin for therapeutic and prophylactic management of venous thromboembolism (deep‑vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) in patients with active cancer, including dose adjustments for impaired renal function?
What prednisone dose and duration is appropriate for an isolated finger sprain in an otherwise healthy adult without diabetes, hypertension, peptic ulcer disease, active infection, or corticosteroid hypersensitivity?
How should I evaluate and treat an adult with new‑onset walking disequilibrium, possibly accompanied by dizziness, falls, or visual changes?
What is the most likely diagnosis and appropriate next management steps for a 35-year-old male with hypertension on losartan and amlodipine presenting with a one‑day history of acute watery diarrhea (≈8 loose, yellow‑green, Bristol type 5 stools), mild lower abdominal cramping, no fever, no blood or mucus, mild dehydration, blood pressure 130/100 mmHg and otherwise normal vitals?
How should I manage a patient on standard anti‑tuberculosis therapy who develops drug‑induced hepatitis (elevated transaminases >3 × upper limit of normal with symptoms or >5 × without symptoms)?
What are the different types of breast cancer?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.