What are the current guidelines for using Group 2 (linear) gadolinium contrast agents in patients with chronic kidney disease, including eGFR thresholds and dialysis considerations?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 12, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Current Guidelines on Group 2 Gadolinium Usage in CKD

Group II gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) can be safely administered to patients with chronic kidney disease at any eGFR level, including those with severe CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²) and dialysis patients, as the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is extremely low and withholding necessary diagnostic imaging likely causes more harm than benefit. 1, 2

GBCA Classification and Risk Profile

Group II GBCAs include macrocyclic agents (gadoterate meglumine, gadobutrol, gadoteridol) and the linear ionic agent gadobenate dimeglumine. 2 These agents are thermodynamically stable and kinetically inert, making them fundamentally different from the high-risk Group I linear agents that caused nearly all unconfounded NSF cases. 2

The evidence base is robust:

  • Zero NSF cases reported in 4,931 Group II GBCA administrations to patients with stage 4-5 CKD 2, 3
  • Upper bound 95% confidence interval for NSF risk: 0.2% (1 in 500) for dialysis patients and 0.5% (1 in 200) for stage 5 CKD 2
  • The 2021 ACR-NKF consensus represents a paradigm shift from older restrictive policies 1, 2

eGFR Thresholds and Clinical Decision-Making

For eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m² (CKD Stages 1-3)

  • Administer Group II GBCAs without restriction 1, 3
  • Kidney function screening is optional before Group II GBCM administration 1
  • NSF risk is negligible in this population 3

For eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² (CKD Stages 4-5)

  • Do not withhold or delay Group II GBCAs if harm would result from not proceeding with indicated contrast-enhanced MRI 1, 2
  • The harm of delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis outweighs the extremely low NSF risk 1, 2
  • Use standard on-label dosing (0.1 mmol/kg); half or quarter dosing is not recommended 4, 5
  • No need to contact referring provider before administration if using Group II agents 1

For Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)

  • Proceed with Group II GBCAs when clinically indicated 1, 2
  • The risk-benefit calculation strongly favors diagnostic imaging over the minimal NSF risk 2
  • eGFR measurement is unreliable in AKI, but this should not prevent GBCA use 1

Dialysis Considerations

Do not initiate, accelerate, or alter established dialysis schedules based on Group II GBCM administration. 1, 2 This represents a critical departure from older practices:

  • Hemodialysis effectively removes GBCAs, but the reduction in NSF risk is only theoretical and unproven in randomized trials 2
  • The risks associated with dialysis manipulation outweigh any theoretical benefit 2
  • Switching from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis to reduce NSF risk is unproven and not recommended 2, 4
  • Dialysis-dependent patients should continue their regular dialysis schedule 4, 5

Dosing and Repeat Administration

  • Use the lowest diagnostic dose (standard 0.1 mmol/kg), regardless of on-label or off-label use 1
  • For multiple closely spaced doses in patients with eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m², the NSF risk remains very small 1
  • For multiple doses in patients with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m², the risk is not well-evaluated 1
  • If not urgent, permit >24 hours between doses or an intercurrent dialysis session for greater GBCM clearance 1, 2
  • Avoid repeat injections when possible 4, 5

Pediatric Population

The same recommendations apply to infants and children without modification. 1 Key points:

  • Use Bedside Schwartz equation or creatinine-cystatin C-based CKiD equation for kidney function assessment, not adult eGFR equations 1
  • Only 23 unique NSF cases reported in children aged ≥6 years (1997-2012), most with Group I GBCAs 1
  • Zero unconfounded NSF cases from Group II GBCAs in pediatric patients 1
  • No reported NSF cases in neonates or infants despite commonly having eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Never use Group I linear agents (gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, gadoversetamide) in patients with any degree of kidney impairment—these remain absolutely contraindicated. 4, 5

Do not withhold Group II GBCAs based solely on eGFR values when diagnostic imaging is clinically necessary. The outdated position that GBCAs are absolutely contraindicated in severe CKD limits access to necessary care and causes more harm than benefit. 4, 5, 2

Do not perform routine kidney function screening before Group II GBCM administration—it is optional and may delay necessary imaging without meaningful benefit. 1

Nephrotoxicity Considerations

On-label dosing of Group II or Group III GBCAs does not cause clinically important nephrotoxicity. 1, 2 This concern should not factor into decision-making about GBCM administration at standard doses.

Group III GBCM (Gadoxetate Disodium)

While Group III agents likely have very low NSF risk, the data are sparse compared to Group II agents. 1, 2 For Group III GBCMs:

  • Kidney function screening is still recommended 1
  • Direct communication between radiologist and referring provider is suggested when eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² 1, 2
  • Consider using Group II agents preferentially given the more robust safety data 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in CKD Stage 3

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Kidney Disease: Comprehensive Review and Clinical Practice Guideline Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists.

Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes, 2018

Related Questions

Does the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Kisqali (ribociclib) infusion require contrast?
What is the association between Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and the use of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents (GBCAs) for MRI scans in causing Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF), a severe dermopathy?
What are the considerations for using contrast in MRI for patients with Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)?
Can these patients receive Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with intravenous (IV) contrast?
Is MRA with contrast contraindicated in a patient with severe renal impairment (eGFR of 12)?
How should an asymptomatic patient with a silent murmur that is found to have severe aortic stenosis be evaluated and managed?
What are the causes, diagnostic workup, and treatment options for polyradiculopathy?
In an elderly patient with severe calcified aortic stenosis and significant comorbidities, should balloon aortic valvuloplasty be performed or is definitive valve replacement—surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)—the preferred treatment?
For a diabetic patient on metformin with a recent glycated hemoglobin of 6.1% and a urine dip‑stick showing trace protein, trace ketones, 2+ leukocyte esterase, negative nitrites, 11–20 white blood cells per high‑power field, a few epithelial cells and occasional casts, is fasting (nothing by mouth) required for the urinalysis and should metformin be continued?
How should a patient with a bicuspid aortic valve and a harsh systolic ejection murmur be evaluated and managed?
What is the appropriate evaluation and management of an adult presenting with new or progressive hair loss?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.