Does amivantamab (RYBREVANT) cross the blood‑brain barrier?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 12, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration of Amivantamab

Amivantamab has poor blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration due to its large molecular size as a bispecific monoclonal antibody, with expected limited CNS activity similar to other antibody-based therapeutics (typically 0.1-0.2% of injected dose reaches the brain). 1, 2

Molecular Characteristics Limiting CNS Penetration

  • Amivantamab is a large bispecific monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR and MET, and like other antibody-based therapeutics, faces significant barriers to crossing the BBB due to its molecular size. 1, 2

  • Monoclonal antibodies typically achieve only 0.1-0.2% of the injected dose in brain tissue due to the restrictive nature of the BBB, which limits passage through tight junctions between endothelial cells and restricts vesicular transport. 2

  • The cerebral capillaries at the BBB restrict drug entry through tight junctions, lack of intracellular fenestrations, paucity of endocytotic vesicles, and presence of multiple efflux transporters. 3

Clinical Evidence of CNS Activity

Despite poor BBB penetration, emerging clinical data suggest amivantamab may have some CNS activity through indirect mechanisms:

  • In the MARIPOSA-2 trial evaluating amivantamab plus chemotherapy in post-osimertinib EGFR-mutated NSCLC, intracranial PFS showed improvement (HR 0.55,95% CI 0.38-0.79), suggesting some benefit in controlling brain metastases. 3

  • A case report demonstrated complete resolution of leptomeningeal disease and brain metastases with amivantamab monotherapy in a patient with rare EGFR mutations (G719A and A289V), challenging assumptions about its CNS limitations. 4

  • In the CHRYSALIS trial of amivantamab monotherapy for EGFR exon 20 insertions, intracranial-only progression occurred in only 11% (13/114) of participants, with brain being the site of first progression in 15% overall. 5

Practical Clinical Implications

For patients with brain metastases requiring amivantamab therapy:

  • Amivantamab remains a Category 1, preferred first-line option when combined with carboplatin-pemetrexed for EGFR exon 20 insertions, even in patients with treated brain metastases. 6, 7

  • Local therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) while continuing amivantamab is feasible and well-tolerated for isolated intracranial progression, with patients continuing treatment for a median of 4.0 months post-SRS (range 2.3-6.0 months). 5

  • Unlike osimertinib, which demonstrated superior CNS penetration with only 6% CNS progression events compared to 15% with first-generation EGFR TKIs, amivantamab should not be relied upon as primary therapy for active CNS disease. 3

Key Caveats

  • The apparent CNS activity observed in clinical trials may reflect systemic disease control reducing seeding of new brain metastases rather than direct drug penetration into the CNS. 1

  • Future combination strategies pairing amivantamab with brain-penetrant EGFR kinase inhibitors are being evaluated to address this limitation. 1

  • Patients with untreated or progressive brain metastases may benefit from upfront local CNS-directed therapy (radiation or surgery) in addition to systemic amivantamab-based regimens. 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.