What is the recommended adjuvant treatment for a patient with uterine endometrioid adenocarcinoma with deep (>2/3) myometrial invasion and no surgical nodal assessment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 12, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma with Deep Myometrial Invasion and No Nodal Staging

For endometrioid adenocarcinoma with >2/3 myometrial invasion and no surgical nodal assessment, adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is recommended, with combined chemotherapy plus EBRT offering greater evidence of benefit than either modality alone. 1

Risk Classification

Your patient falls into the high-risk category based on deep myometrial invasion (>2/3 = >50%), regardless of tumor grade or LVSI status. 1 The absence of nodal staging is critical here—it means occult nodal disease cannot be ruled out, which directly influences treatment intensity. 1

Treatment Algorithm Based on Tumor Grade

If Grade 1-2 (Lower High-Risk)

  • Adjuvant EBRT is the baseline recommendation for pelvic control when nodes were not assessed. 1
  • Combined chemotherapy plus EBRT can be considered, though the evidence is stronger for Grade 3 disease. 1
  • If nodes had been assessed and were negative, vaginal brachytherapy alone would have been an option for G1-2 without LVSI. 1

If Grade 3 (Higher High-Risk)

  • Combined chemotherapy plus EBRT is strongly recommended over either modality alone, as this combination addresses both locoregional and distant recurrence risk. 1, 2
  • The standard regimen consists of EBRT 48.6 Gy with concurrent cisplatin 50 mg/m² for two cycles, followed by four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m². 2
  • Grade 3 with deep invasion carries a 48% 5-year distant metastasis-free survival when both risk factors are present, compared to 89% with only one factor. 3
  • Approximately 80% of recurrences in stage IB/IC Grade 3 disease are extra-pelvic, occurring at a median of 22.5 months, with 75% mortality among those who recur. 4

Critical Importance of LVSI Status

You must determine LVSI status from the final pathology report. 1, 5

  • LVSI-negative: Maintains high-risk classification; proceed with EBRT ± chemotherapy based on grade as above. 1
  • LVSI-positive: Substantially increases distant recurrence risk and strengthens the indication for combined chemoradiotherapy, particularly for Grade 3 disease. 5, 3
  • LVSI presence independently predicts systemic failure and is a pivotal factor in treatment escalation decisions. 3, 4

Why Nodal Staging Matters

The absence of surgical nodal assessment creates uncertainty about true stage (could be occult stage IIIC). 1 Had comprehensive pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy been performed and nodes were negative:

  • Grade 1-2 without LVSI: Vaginal brachytherapy alone would suffice. 1
  • Grade 3 or LVSI-positive: Limited-field EBRT would be recommended. 1
  • The detection rate for nodal metastases in deep myometrial invasion ranges from 2.6-5.1% depending on assessment method. 6

Molecular Classification Considerations

If molecular profiling is available, refine your treatment decision: 2, 5

  • p53-abnormal tumors: Strong indication for chemotherapy (23% absolute recurrence-free survival improvement). 2, 5
  • POLE-ultramutated tumors: Excellent prognosis without chemotherapy; may not require intensive treatment even with deep invasion. 2, 5
  • MMR-deficient/NSMP tumors: Follow standard risk-based algorithms as outlined above. 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use observation alone when nodes are unstaged and myometrial invasion is deep—this is inadequate for high-risk disease. 1
  • Do not use vaginal brachytherapy alone without nodal assessment in deep invasion cases; this is only appropriate for intermediate-risk disease or node-negative high-risk disease. 1, 7
  • Do not rely on pre-operative biopsy grade—base all decisions on final surgical pathology, as grade can be upgraded in 20-30% of cases. 7
  • Do not delay treatment beyond 12 weeks post-surgery if radiation is planned. 7

Toxicity Considerations

Combined chemoradiotherapy carries significant toxicity: 2

  • Grade 3+ adverse events occur in 60% of patients (versus 12% with radiation alone). 2
  • Most grade 3 events are hematologic (45%). 2
  • Persistent sensory neuropathy occurs in 6% at 5 years. 2
  • However, the 5-year overall survival benefit is 81.4% versus 76.1% with radiation alone (HR 0.70, p=0.034). 2

Summary Treatment Pathway

  1. Confirm final pathology: Grade, depth of invasion (>2/3), LVSI status. 1, 5
  2. Obtain molecular profiling if available (p53, POLE, MMR status). 2, 5
  3. Grade 1-2, LVSI-negative: Adjuvant EBRT; consider adding chemotherapy. 1
  4. Grade 3 OR LVSI-positive: Combined chemotherapy plus EBRT (standard regimen: EBRT 48.6 Gy + concurrent cisplatin → carboplatin/paclitaxel × 4 cycles). 1, 2
  5. Initiate treatment within 12 weeks of surgery. 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

High-Risk Endometrial Cancer Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Adjuvant Treatment for Stage 1 Grade 3 Endometrial Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Adjuvant Management of Intermediate‑Risk Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer (Final Surgical Pathology)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.