Adductor Canal Block vs Femoral Nerve Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty
For pain control satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty, adductor canal block (ACB) and femoral nerve block (FNB) provide equivalent analgesia, but ACB is the superior choice because it preserves quadriceps strength and enables earlier mobilization—critical outcomes for elderly and frail patients—without compromising pain relief.
Pain Control: Equivalent Between Both Blocks
Both ACB and FNB deliver comparable postoperative analgesia after TKA:
- No significant differences exist in pain scores at rest or with movement between ACB and FNB at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively 1, 2
- Opioid consumption is similar between both techniques, with no clinically meaningful difference in rescue analgesic requirements 1, 2
- Patient satisfaction scores show no significant differences between the two approaches in most studies, though one study found slightly higher satisfaction with FNB on postoperative day 1 3, 1
The evidence demonstrates that ACB is noninferior to FNB for cumulative morphine consumption and pain scores during the first 24 hours 4. This means you can confidently choose ACB without worrying about inadequate pain control.
Functional Recovery: ACB is Superior
The critical difference lies in motor function preservation:
- Quadriceps strength is significantly better preserved with ACB compared to FNB, with measurable differences starting immediately postoperatively and persisting through postoperative day 1 3, 1, 4
- ACB patients demonstrate superior mobilization ability and achieve physical therapy milestones more readily 1
- FNB causes substantial quadriceps weakness that impairs early ambulation and increases fall risk—a particularly dangerous complication in elderly patients 5
One high-quality study showed quadriceps maximal voluntary isometric contraction at 45 minutes post-block was 26.6 pound-force for ACB versus only 10.6 pound-force for FNB, representing a clinically significant difference 4.
Clinical Algorithm for Block Selection
Choose ACB as the default approach for TKA patients because:
- It provides equivalent analgesia to FNB 1, 2, 4
- It preserves quadriceps motor strength 3, 1, 4
- It enables earlier mobilization without compromising pain control 1, 5
- It carries lower fall risk due to preserved motor function 5
This recommendation is especially important for:
- Elderly patients at higher baseline fall risk
- Frail patients requiring early mobilization to prevent complications
- Patients in enhanced recovery protocols emphasizing rapid rehabilitation
Guideline Context and Evidence Quality
The 2008 Anaesthesia guidelines support FNB for TKA based on Grade A evidence for reducing pain scores and supplemental analgesia 6. However, these guidelines predate the emergence of ACB as a motor-sparing alternative and explicitly note that "the role of continuous infusions needs to be critically evaluated against single injection techniques" with attention to "impact on mobilisation and reaching rehabilitation goals" 6.
The more recent comparative evidence (2015-2018) consistently demonstrates ACB's superiority for functional outcomes 3, 1, 2, 4. A 2017 meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials involving 609 patients concluded that ACB shows better functional recovery after TKA without compromising pain control 1.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Don't assume FNB is necessary for adequate analgesia: The evidence clearly shows ACB provides equivalent pain relief 1, 2, 4
- Don't overlook motor function as a critical outcome: Quadriceps weakness from FNB directly impairs rehabilitation and increases complications 5
- Don't ignore fall risk in elderly patients: FNB-induced motor blockade substantially increases fall risk, which can be catastrophic in frail patients 5
Integration with Multimodal Analgesia
Both blocks should be combined with the guideline-recommended multimodal approach 6: