What does a Metavir fibrosis score of F0‑F1 indicate and how should it be managed?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 12, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

METAVIR Score F0-F1: Minimal to No Liver Fibrosis

Definition and Clinical Significance

A METAVIR score of F0-F1 indicates absent to minimal liver fibrosis with no significant scarring, representing the earliest stages of liver disease with an excellent prognosis and extremely low risk of clinical decompensation or hepatocellular carcinoma. 1

  • F0 = No fibrosis whatsoever 1
  • F1 = Minimal fibrosis with no septa or rare thin septum 2, 1
  • These patients are not at immediate risk for liver-related complications 1

Management Strategy by Etiology

Chronic Hepatitis C with F0-F1

Treatment can be deferred in patients with F0-F1 fibrosis who lack severe extra-hepatic manifestations, as informed deferral is acceptable according to EASL guidelines. 1

However, treatment should be prioritized regardless of F0-F1 status in specific high-risk scenarios:

  • Patients at risk of HCV transmission (healthcare workers, active injection drug users) 1
  • Presence of clinically significant extra-hepatic manifestations (cryoglobulinemia, glomerulonephritis) 1
  • HIV or HBV coinfection 1
  • Debilitating fatigue affecting quality of life 1

Post-Treatment Surveillance

Patients with F0-F1 who achieve sustained virologic response (SVR) can be safely discharged from specialized hepatology care to general practitioner follow-up. 1

Confirmation of minimal fibrosis for discharge requires:

  • Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) liver stiffness <8 kPa, OR 1
  • FIB-4 score <1.45 1, 3

Non-Invasive Diagnostic Confirmation

Elastography Thresholds for F0-F1

  • VCTE <7.0 kPa effectively rules out significant fibrosis (F2-F4) in chronic hepatitis C and B 4
  • Shear wave elastography (SWE) ≤1.76 m/s corresponds to F0-F1 with 96% negative predictive value 5
  • Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) cutoff of 2.5-3.14 kPa distinguishes F0-F1 from higher stages 3

Serum Biomarkers

  • FIB-4 <1.45 effectively rules out F2-F4 fibrosis with superior performance to APRI 3
  • FibroTest values <0.31 have 91% negative predictive value for excluding significant fibrosis 6
  • Non-invasive serum markers and elastography differentiate F0-F1 from significant fibrosis with AUROC scores of 0.8-0.87 1

Critical Pitfall: Ongoing Cofactors

The major caveat is that F0-F1 patients with ongoing cofactors remain at risk for disease progression even after HCV cure or with minimal baseline fibrosis. 1

High-risk cofactors requiring aggressive management:

  • Diabetes mellitus or metabolic syndrome 1
  • Daily alcohol consumption ≥50 grams 7
  • Male sex and age >40 years at infection 7
  • Obesity and NAFLD 3

These patients require continued hepatology follow-up despite minimal fibrosis, as the median time to cirrhosis can be as short as 13 years in men infected after age 40 who consume alcohol, compared to 42 years in women without alcohol use infected before age 40. 7

Surveillance Requirements

No Routine HCC Screening Needed

  • F0-F1 patients have extremely low HCC risk and do not require ultrasound surveillance 1
  • HCC can rarely develop in F0-F2 patients with chronic HCV (10.6% of HCC cases), typically presenting as large solitary tumors in older non-Asian men 8

Monitoring for Fibrosis Progression

  • Repeat FIB-4 or elastography every 2-3 years if cofactors present 1, 3
  • Annual assessment if metabolic syndrome, ongoing alcohol use, or age >50 years 7
  • Immediate re-evaluation if ALT elevation >80 IU/L, as this can falsely elevate stiffness measurements 4

When to Escalate Care

Refer to hepatology if:

  • FIB-4 rises to indeterminate range (1.45-3.25) 3
  • VCTE increases to ≥8 kPa 1
  • Development of thrombocytopenia or other signs of portal hypertension 3
  • Persistent ALT elevation despite treatment of underlying cause 4

Related Questions

What does a Matavir score of F0-F1 indicate in terms of liver fibrosis?
What is the Metavir score (METAVIR, Meta-analysis of Histological Data in Viral Hepatitis)?
Is FibroTest (fibrosis test) medically necessary?
What is the next step in management for a 41-year-old male patient with a history of Hepatitis C (Hep C) treatment in 2023, who is undergoing Fibrotest/Actitest to assess liver fibrosis?
How is the METAVIR scoring system used in the management of patients with a history of liver disease, possibly hepatitis C?
In a 45‑year‑old man with recurrent schizophrenia receiving maintenance antipsychotic therapy to suppress symptoms, prevent relapse, and improve quality of life, which outcome is most likely?
What are the diagnostic criteria for type 2 diabetes mellitus and the recommended screening schedule for at‑risk adults?
Why are my testes still smaller one day after ejaculation without pain or other symptoms?
What are the clinical indications and dosing guidelines for gabapentin?
What baseline labs and tests (renal panel, electrolytes, fasting glucose or hemoglobin A1c, lipid profile, urine pregnancy test for women of child‑bearing potential, urine protein dipstick, and resting ECG if there is coronary artery disease, arrhythmia, or chest pain) should be ordered before initiating amlodipine for hypertension?
Should the daptomycin dose be reduced in a patient with endocarditis and bacteremia due to a Gram‑positive organism, suspected daptomycin‑related liver injury, and stage 4 chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate 15–29 mL/min)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.