Least Sedating Muscle Relaxant
Based on available evidence, no skeletal muscle relaxant can be definitively recommended as "least sedating" because all centrally-acting muscle relaxants carry CNS adverse effects, primarily sedation, as a class characteristic, with no compelling evidence that any agent differs significantly in this regard. 1
Evidence-Based Reality
- All oral skeletal muscle relaxants produce sedation through their central nervous system mechanisms of action 2, 1, 3
- The mechanism of action for most agents remains poorly defined, and their effects are measured mainly by subjective responses, making direct comparisons of sedation profiles unreliable 3
- Clinical trials have consistently failed to demonstrate superiority of any one muscle relaxant over another, including for side effect profiles 4, 5
Practical Clinical Approach for Adults Without Hepatic/Renal Impairment
First-Line Considerations
Metaxalone or methocarbamol may represent the most reasonable choices when minimizing sedation is the priority:
Metaxalone has the fewest reports of side effects among commonly prescribed muscle relaxants, though sedation still occurs 6
Methocarbamol may have lower anticholinergic burden than cyclobenzaprine in elderly patients, though all increase fall risk 1, 8
Agents to Avoid When Sedation is a Concern
Cyclobenzaprine: Structurally related to tricyclic antidepressants, causes expected lethargy and anticholinergic effects including hallucinations, confusion, and drowsiness 2, 6
Carisoprodol: High abuse potential, causes sedation, and has been removed from European markets 1, 6
Orphenadrine: Similar structure to diphenhydramine with anticholinergic symptoms including confusion and anxiety 2
Tizanidine: Causes significant sedation and is not extensively studied for acute musculoskeletal conditions 1
Critical Treatment Principles
Duration of therapy should be limited to 2-3 weeks maximum 1
All muscle relaxants increase fall risk and require cautious use, particularly in older adults 1, 8
Monitor for excessive sedation, especially when combining muscle relaxants with other CNS depressants 9
Important Clinical Pitfall
The question itself reflects a common misconception in clinical practice: that meaningful differences in sedation profiles exist among centrally-acting muscle relaxants. The evidence does not support this assumption 1, 3, 4. Selection should be based on contraindications, drug interactions, abuse potential, and cost rather than presumed differences in sedation 4.