What type of diagnostic test is a coronary calcium score?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 13, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Coronary Calcium Score: Diagnostic Test Classification

A coronary calcium score is a non-invasive imaging test that quantifies coronary artery calcification using computed tomography (CT) to assess atherosclerotic plaque burden and predict cardiovascular risk—it is fundamentally a risk stratification tool, not a diagnostic test for obstructive coronary artery disease. 1, 2

What the Test Actually Measures

  • Coronary CT detects and quantifies coronary artery calcium (CAC), which serves as a marker of total atherosclerotic disease burden and vascular age. 1, 2

  • The scan uses electrocardiogram-gated multidetector CT (or electron beam tomography) with relatively low radiation exposure of approximately 0.37-1.5 mSv—comparable to 1-2 mammograms per breast. 1, 3

  • The Agatston score is the most widely used quantification method, defining calcific lesions as having CT density >130 Hounsfield units with area >1 mm². 2, 4

  • Calcification does not occur in normal vessel walls, so any detectable calcium definitively confirms the presence of atherosclerosis. 1, 2

Critical Distinction: Atherosclerosis vs. Stenosis

  • CAC scoring has only ~50% specificity for detecting ≥50% luminal stenosis because calcium burden reflects total plaque burden, not the degree of luminal obstruction. 1, 2

  • The test cannot detect non-calcified atherosclerotic plaques, which may be present in earlier disease stages and can be clinically significant. 1, 2, 3

  • Coronary calcification is neither a marker of plaque stability nor instability—it simply indicates atherosclerotic burden. 1, 5

  • Patients with acute coronary syndromes often have extensive coronary calcification, but the calcium itself does not predict which specific plaque will rupture. 1, 5

Primary Clinical Role: Risk Stratification

  • CAC scoring is most appropriately used for cardiovascular risk assessment in asymptomatic adults aged 40-75 years with intermediate (7.5-20%) or borderline (5-7.5%) 10-year ASCVD risk when preventive treatment decisions are uncertain. 1, 2, 3

  • A CAC score of zero indicates excellent prognosis with very low risk (<1% annually) for cardiac death or myocardial infarction, allowing potential deferral of statin therapy. 2, 3, 6

  • Cardiovascular risk increases proportionally with calcium scores, with scores ≥400 indicating high risk (>20% 10-year event rate) and warranting aggressive preventive therapy. 2, 5, 6

  • The test provides incremental prognostic information beyond conventional risk factors like Framingham Risk Score. 6, 7

When NOT to Use CAC Scoring

  • CAC scoring should not be ordered to diagnose or exclude obstructive coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients because 7-38% of symptomatic patients with CAC=0 still have obstructive CAD. 2

  • The test was explicitly not recommended in the 2000 ACC/AHA expert consensus document to diagnose obstructive CAD due to its low specificity for stenosis detection. 1

  • For symptomatic patients requiring stenosis assessment, functional stress testing (stress myocardial perfusion imaging, stress echocardiography) or coronary CT angiography are appropriate first-line tests. 2

  • CAC scoring should not be used to determine need for revascularization or replace invasive coronary angiography when definitive stenosis assessment is needed. 2

Common Clinical Pitfall

The most frequent misunderstanding is interpreting CAC scoring as a test for coronary stenosis. A high calcium score (e.g., 400) indicates extensive atherosclerotic burden and high cardiovascular risk, but does NOT confirm the presence of flow-limiting stenoses requiring revascularization. 1, 2 Conversely, a zero calcium score provides excellent negative predictive value for excluding significant stenosis in asymptomatic patients, but this warranty diminishes in symptomatic individuals and those with diabetes beyond 5 years. 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

CT Calcium Score for Diagnosing Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

CT Calcium Scoring for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Coronary Calcium Scoring: Prognostic Value and Clinical Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Coronary Calcium Score and Cardiovascular Risk.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.