Contralateral Recurrence of Bell's Palsy After Resolution
Contralateral recurrence of Bell's palsy after the initial episode resolves is uncommon but well-documented, occurring in approximately 7-12% of all Bell's palsy patients, with equal frequency between ipsilateral and contralateral recurrence. 1, 2
Recurrence Rates and Patterns
The overall recurrence rate of Bell's palsy ranges from 7.1% to 12% of all patients who experience an initial episode. 1, 2, 3 Among patients who do experience recurrence:
- Ipsilateral and contralateral recurrences occur with equal frequency—there is no predilection for the same side versus the opposite side. 2
- The majority of patients with more than two episodes of facial palsy have at least one episode on the contralateral side. 1
- In one large series, 58.5% of patients with recurrent facial paralysis had at least one contralateral episode. 4
Timing and Risk Factors
Recurrence is most likely to occur within the first 2 years after the initial episode, with a mean time to recurrence of approximately 9.8 years after the first attack. 1, 2 Key temporal patterns include:
- 70% of recurrences occur within 10 years of the first episode. 5
- There may be a seasonal pattern, with some studies noting increased recurrence in the last months of the year. 5
Young females appear to have higher risk for recurrent idiopathic facial palsy, though one large series found no statistically significant sex predominance except in the 10-19 year age group. 1, 2
Clinical Implications and Prognosis
Recovery after recurrent episodes may be worse than after the initial episode, particularly with multiple recurrences:
- Recovery was worse in 39.6% after ipsilateral recurrence and 32.1% after contralateral recurrence. 5
- Recovery after multiple palsies appears worse than after a single episode. 5
- However, one study found that recurrent facial paralysis did not indicate a worse prognosis for recovery regardless of which side was affected. 2
The mean age at onset of the first Bell's palsy episode in patients who later experience recurrence is approximately 33 years, suggesting that younger patients may be at higher risk for recurrence. 2
Differential Diagnosis Considerations
While most recurrent facial paralysis is idiopathic Bell's palsy (77.4% of cases), recurrence—especially contralateral recurrence—warrants consideration of alternative diagnoses: 4
- Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome (7.5% of recurrent cases): characterized by recurrent facial paralysis, fissured tongue, and orofacial edema. 1, 4
- Neurosarcoidosis (3.7% of recurrent cases). 4
- Neoplastic causes (5.7%): facial nerve schwannoma or metastatic disease. 4
- Other systemic diseases including granulomatosis with polyangiitis. 4
Bilateral Bell's palsy is rare and should prompt investigation for Lyme disease, sarcoidosis, or Guillain-Barré syndrome rather than simple recurrent idiopathic facial palsy. 6, 7
Follow-Up Recommendations
Patients diagnosed with Bell's palsy should be followed for at least 2 years from onset, especially children, given that most recurrences occur within this timeframe. 1 The frequency of recurrent facial palsy in children is similar to that in adults. 1
Patients with incomplete facial recovery at 3 months after initial symptom onset should be reassessed or referred to a specialist, as this may indicate either incomplete resolution or an alternative diagnosis. 8
Long-term follow-up data is reassuring: in one series of 77 patients followed a mean of 33 years after the first episode, none showed progressive facial-nerve dysfunction or signs of tumor. 2
Common Pitfalls
- Assuming recurrence always occurs on the same side: contralateral recurrence is equally common as ipsilateral recurrence. 2
- Failing to consider alternative diagnoses: while most recurrent facial paralysis is idiopathic, approximately 23% have identifiable causes requiring different management. 4
- Not providing adequate follow-up: the 2-year window after initial diagnosis is critical for detecting recurrence. 1
- Overlooking Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome: this accounts for a meaningful proportion of recurrent cases and has distinct management implications. 1, 4