What antipseudomonal β‑lactam antibiotic can be used as an alternative to Zerbaxa (ceftolozane/tazobactam) in an adult with no drug allergies, normal renal function, and a suspected multidrug‑resistant gram‑negative infection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 14, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Antipseudomonal β-Lactam Alternatives to Zerbaxa

For multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections in adults with normal renal function, ceftazidime-avibactam 2.5 g IV every 8 hours is the most comparable alternative to Zerbaxa (ceftolozane/tazobactam), offering similar spectrum coverage against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 1

Primary Alternative: Ceftazidime-Avibactam

Ceftazidime-avibactam represents the closest pharmacologic alternative to ceftolozane/tazobactam, as both are novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations with activity against multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens. 1, 2

Spectrum of Activity

  • Active against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, including those resistant to third-generation cephalosporins 1
  • Retains activity against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and difficult-to-treat resistant strains 1
  • Uniquely active against KPC-producing organisms (Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase), which distinguishes it from ceftolozane/tazobactam 1, 2
  • Does NOT cover metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) producers - this is a critical limitation 1

Dosing

  • Standard dose: 2.5 g IV every 8 hours (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) infused over 2 hours 1
  • No renal adjustment needed with normal kidney function 3

Clinical Evidence

  • Similar efficacy to ceftolozane/tazobactam for non-pulmonary infections in observational studies 4
  • Demonstrated lower 30-day mortality compared to other regimens in CRE bloodstream infections 1
  • Well-tolerated safety profile comparable to other cephalosporins 2

Secondary Alternatives Based on Infection Site

For Non-Severe or Community-Acquired Infections

Piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375-4.5 g IV every 6 hours remains an option when susceptibility is confirmed, though its use in ESBL infections is controversial. 1

  • Broad-spectrum coverage including anti-Pseudomonas activity and anaerobic coverage 1
  • Reserve for stable patients with confirmed susceptibility 1
  • Not reliable for ESBL producers despite in vitro susceptibility 1

For Carbapenem-Susceptible Organisms

Meropenem 2 g IV every 8 hours (extended infusion over 3 hours preferred) or imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg IV every 6 hours for confirmed susceptible pathogens. 1

  • Group 2 carbapenems (meropenem, imipenem, doripenem) have activity against non-fermentative gram-negative bacilli including P. aeruginosa 1
  • Should be reserved to preserve carbapenem activity due to emerging resistance 1

For Ceftazidime-Susceptible Pseudomonas

Ceftazidime 2 g IV every 8 hours when susceptibility is documented. 1

  • Third-generation cephalosporin with anti-Pseudomonas activity 1
  • Must combine with metronidazole for intra-abdominal infections (lacks anaerobic coverage) 1

Cefepime 2 g IV every 8-12 hours as a fourth-generation alternative. 1

  • Broader spectrum than third-generation cephalosporins and effective against AmpC-producing organisms 1
  • Also requires metronidazole for anaerobic coverage 1

Newer Alternatives for Highly Resistant Pathogens

Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam

1.25 g IV every 6 hours for CRE infections when susceptible. 1

  • Active against class A carbapenemases (KPC) and class C cephalosporinases 1
  • Not active against class B (MBL) or class D carbapenemases 1

Meropenem-Vaborbactam

4 g IV every 8 hours for KPC-producing CRE. 1

  • Specifically inhibits KPC enzymes (class A carbapenemases) 1
  • Demonstrated lower mortality (15.6% vs 33.3%) compared to best available therapy in CRE bloodstream infections 1
  • Reduced nephrotoxicity compared to polymyxin-based regimens 1

Critical Pitfalls and Caveats

Resistance Mechanisms to Avoid

  • Never use ceftazidime-avibactam or ceftolozane/tazobactam for MBL-producing strains - both are inactive against metallo-β-lactamases 1
  • For MBL producers, consider ceftazidime-avibactam PLUS aztreonam combination (HR 0.37 for mortality reduction) 1

Infection Site Considerations

  • For pneumonia specifically, ceftolozane/tazobactam is preferred over ceftazidime-avibactam based on guideline recommendations 4, 5
  • For non-pulmonary infections, both agents are equally effective 4

Resistance Development

  • Resistance can emerge during therapy, particularly with ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy (3.8-10.4% of cases) 1
  • Combination therapy has not been proven superior to monotherapy for preventing resistance in most clinical studies 1

When to Use Older Agents

  • Fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin 400 mg IV q8h, levofloxacin 750 mg IV daily) are no longer first-line due to widespread resistance, but remain options for β-lactam allergies 1
  • Aminoglycosides (amikacin 15 mg/kg IV daily) should be reserved for combination therapy in MDR infections or β-lactam allergies due to nephrotoxicity 1
  • Colistin (5 mg/kg loading dose, then maintenance dosing) is a last-resort option with significant nephrotoxicity risk 1

Treatment Algorithm

  1. Obtain susceptibility testing immediately including novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor panels 4, 5
  2. If ESBL or CRPA suspected: Use ceftazidime-avibactam 2.5 g IV q8h 1
  3. If KPC-producing CRE: Prefer meropenem-vaborbactam 4 g IV q8h or ceftazidime-avibactam 1
  4. If MBL-producing strain: Use ceftazidime-avibactam PLUS aztreonam combination 1
  5. If susceptible to older agents: Consider piperacillin-tazobactam or carbapenems to preserve newer agents 1
  6. Add metronidazole 500 mg IV q8h for intra-abdominal infections when using agents lacking anaerobic coverage 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infections with Newer Beta-Lactam/Inhibitor Combinations

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Treatment of Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Post-Bone Marrow Transplant Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.