What chemotherapy regimens are recommended for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 14, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Chemotherapy Regimens for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

For metastatic or locally recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the head and neck, cisplatin-vinorelbine combination provides the highest objective response rates among chemotherapy regimens, though overall response rates remain modest (typically <10%) and chemotherapy should be reserved primarily for symptomatic or rapidly progressive disease. 1

Key Distinction: ACC is NOT Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The provided guidelines focus predominantly on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), which responds differently to chemotherapy than ACC. ACC is a rare salivary gland malignancy with distinct biology, characterized by indolent growth, perineural invasion, and limited chemosensitivity. 2, 3

Chemotherapy Regimens for ACC

Combination Chemotherapy (Preferred for Symptomatic Disease)

  • Cisplatin-vinorelbine demonstrates the best objective response rates among combination regimens, though specific response percentages vary widely (0-70% across studies). 1
  • This combination should be considered first-line for patients with symptomatic or rapidly progressive metastatic ACC. 1

Single-Agent Chemotherapy Options

  • Cisplatin monotherapy has documented single-agent activity in ACC. 1
  • Mitoxantrone shows objective responses in some patients. 1
  • Vinorelbine as monotherapy demonstrates activity. 1
  • Eribulin has shown objective responses. 1
  • Epirubicin (30 mg/m² weekly for 8 weeks) produced 2 objective responses (10%) and disease stabilization in 50% of patients, with symptomatic improvement in 29.4% of cases occurring within 8 weeks. 4

Targeted Therapy Considerations

  • EGFR inhibitors provide approximately 40% objective responses only when used in combination (not as monotherapy). 1
  • VEGF inhibitors and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors achieve disease stabilization in progressive patients with approximately 10% objective response rates. 1
  • c-KIT inhibitors as monotherapy yield objective response rates <5%. 1
  • Direct PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors show 0% objective response rate. 1

Clinical Decision Algorithm

When to Use Chemotherapy in ACC

  1. Reserve chemotherapy for symptomatic disease or rapidly progressive metastatic/recurrent ACC not amenable to surgery or radiation. 4, 3
  2. Avoid chemotherapy in asymptomatic patients with indolent metastatic disease, as ACC can remain stable for prolonged periods without treatment. 3

Treatment Selection

  • For symptomatic or rapidly progressive disease: Start with cisplatin-vinorelbine combination. 1
  • For patients unable to tolerate combination therapy: Consider single-agent cisplatin, vinorelbine, or epirubicin. 1, 4
  • For disease stabilization in progressive patients: Consider VEGF or HDAC inhibitors. 1

Role of Concurrent Chemoradiation

  • For unresectable, node-negative, non-metastatic ACC: Definitive proton radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin achieved complete response in 44% (4/9 patients) and disease stabilization in an additional 44%, though with significant toxicity including grade 3 acute toxicities and one grade 4 chronic optic nerve disorder. 5
  • This approach should be considered for locally advanced unresectable disease where surgery is precluded by perineural or skull base invasion. 5

Critical Caveats

  • Objective response rates to chemotherapy in ACC are predominantly <10%, far lower than in HNSCC where combination regimens achieve 20-40% response rates. 1, 6
  • Symptomatic improvement may occur more frequently than objective radiographic responses, as demonstrated with epirubicin where 29.4% had symptomatic improvement despite only 10% objective response rate. 4
  • Long-term survival is possible even with metastatic disease, so treatment decisions must balance potential toxicity against the indolent natural history in many patients. 2, 3
  • Referral to specialized centers or tumor boards (such as REFCOR networks) is strongly recommended given the rarity of ACC and availability of clinical trials targeting specific molecular abnormalities. 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.