For a healthy 14-year-old male with no chronic conditions, no tobacco or sexual activity, and a negative depression screen, which USPSTF-recommended preventive service is most appropriate: skin‑cancer counseling, standardized substance‑use disorder screening, scoliosis screening, fasting lipid panel, or chlamydia testing?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 14, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Standardized Substance Use Disorder Screening

For this healthy 14-year-old male, a standardized screening tool for substance use disorder (option b) is the most appropriate USPSTF-aligned preventive service, as the American Academy of Pediatrics strongly recommends annual screening for all adolescents using validated tools like CRAFFT, given that substance abuse is a leading cause of adolescent morbidity and mortality. 1

Why Substance Use Screening is Most Appropriate

  • The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all adolescents be screened annually for tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, and other drugs to identify early morbidity and mortality risks, as substance abuse represents one of the primary causes of death and disability in this age group 2, 1

  • The CRAFFT questionnaire is the preferred screening instrument, requiring under 2 minutes to complete with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting substance use disorders 1, 3

  • Screening must be conducted in a private setting with the adolescent alone to ensure honest disclosure, as approximately 58% of high school students report health concerns they wish to keep private from parents 4

  • Even in adolescents without current substance use, screening serves a preventive function by opening dialogue about risks and may have therapeutic effects in itself 3

Why Other Options Are Not Indicated

Skin Cancer Prevention Counseling (option a)

  • The USPSTF finds insufficient evidence to recommend routine visual skin cancer examinations or preventive counseling for skin cancer in asymptomatic adolescents 1

Scoliosis Screening (option c)

  • No current USPSTF recommendation supports routine scoliosis screening in adolescents, indicating a lack of sufficient evidence for its preventive benefit 1

Fasting Lipid Panel (option d)

  • Lipid screening is recommended between ages 9-11 years if there is a family history of hyperlipidemia or cardiovascular disease, but this 14-year-old is outside that window and has no mentioned risk factors 1, 4

Chlamydia Testing (option e)

  • STI screening is only indicated for sexually active adolescents, and this patient explicitly does not engage in sexual activity 1, 4

Critical Implementation Points

  • Mandatory private time alone with the adolescent is essential for addressing sensitive topics including substance use, as fear of disclosure causes adolescents to delay or avoid needed care 1, 4

  • Positive CRAFFT screens identify youth experiencing adverse consequences who should be referred for appropriate treatment services 1

  • The screening can be administered face-to-face, on paper, or via computer without loss of validity, taking an average of 49-74 seconds 1, 3

  • While the USPSTF assigns an "I" (insufficient evidence) rating to behavioral interventions for preventing drug use in adolescents without diagnosed disorders, this does not negate the strong recommendation for universal screening itself, which serves to identify those needing treatment 2, 1

References

Guideline

USPSTF Recommendations for Adolescent Health

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Screening and brief intervention for alcohol and other abuse.

Adolescent medicine: state of the art reviews, 2014

Guideline

Comprehensive Well-Child Visit for Adolescents

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Related Questions

In a 14-year-old male with no chronic medical problems, who does not smoke, is not sexually active, has a negative depression screen and a normal physical exam, which U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)–recommended preventive service is most appropriate: counseling on skin cancer prevention, standardized screening for substance use disorder, scoliosis screening, fasting lipid panel, or chlamydia testing?
What is the recommended approach for screening and treating alcohol use disorder in adolescents?
What are the recommended strategies for alcohol harm reduction in patients with alcohol use disorder?
What is the best approach to assess and treat substance abuse in an adolescent patient, potentially using the CRAFFT (Car, Relaxation, Alone, Forget, Friends, and Trouble) screening tool?
Should illicit drug use screening be performed in Medicare patients prior to prescribing stimulants, such as those containing methylphenidate (Ritalin)?
In an adult female undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy, what is the most common site of ureteric injury?
Can myocarditis occur up to one year after initiating durvalumab (Imfinzi) therapy?
What is the appropriate management of a pediatric patient with severe acute malnutrition presenting with a celiac crisis?
Should levodopa be taken on an empty stomach, and how does food—especially high‑protein meals—affect its absorption and clinical effectiveness?
How should I manage an adult with a purulent skin infection (pus point) and severe infection, who has normal renal function and no β‑lactam allergy?
What is the appropriate emergency management of hypoglycemia?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.