Bipolar vs Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture
For your 85-year-old patient with a displaced subcapital femoral neck fracture, either unipolar or bipolar cemented hemiarthroplasty is appropriate, as they produce equivalent clinical outcomes in mortality, morbidity, and quality of life. 1
Primary Recommendation Based on Guidelines
The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) 2022 guidelines provide a moderate strength recommendation that unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty can be equally beneficial for displaced femoral neck fractures. 1 This means you should generally follow this recommendation but remain sensitive to patient-specific factors and cost considerations.
Key Evidence Supporting Equivalence
Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life
- Multiple high-quality randomized trials demonstrate no significant differences in hip function scores (Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score) between unipolar and bipolar prostheses at 12-month follow-up. 2, 3, 4
- Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D scores) shows no significant difference between groups, though one study showed a trend toward better quality of life with bipolar at 4 months (0.62 vs 0.54, p=0.06). 3
- Walking speed and endurance measured by Six-Minute Walk tests are equivalent between both prosthesis types. 4
Complication Rates
- Dislocation rates are equivalent between unipolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasty. 2
- Postoperative medical and wound complications occur at similar rates in both groups. 2
- Revision surgery rates show no significant differences between the two implant types. 2
The Acetabular Erosion Consideration
Common pitfall: Acetabular erosion is often cited as a reason to prefer bipolar prostheses, but its clinical significance is questionable.
- One randomized trial found 20% acetabular erosion with unipolar versus 5% with bipolar at 12 months (p=0.03). 3
- However, this radiographic finding showed only trends toward worse outcomes (not statistically significant): Harris Hip Score 70.4 vs 79.3 (p=0.09) and EQ-5D 0.48 vs 0.63 (p=0.13). 3
- At 36-month follow-up, another study found no functional differences despite theoretical concerns about acetabular wear. 2
Practical Decision Algorithm
Use either unipolar or bipolar based on these factors:
Favor Unipolar When:
- Cost is a significant institutional concern (unipolar is substantially less expensive). 5, 4
- Patient has limited pre-injury mobility and is less active. 5
- Patient has severe osteopenia and is at high risk for periprosthetic fracture (shorter operative time with unipolar). 5
Consider Bipolar When:
- Patient has better pre-injury functional status and may benefit from theoretical acetabular preservation. 3
- Institutional cost difference is negligible.
- Patient or family preference after shared decision-making.
Essential Technical Requirements (Regardless of Choice)
Both prostheses MUST be cemented in your 85-year-old patient with likely osteoporosis. The AAOS provides a strong recommendation for cemented femoral stems in elderly patients undergoing arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. 1, 6, 7 Cemented fixation:
- Improves hip function. 6
- Reduces residual pain. 6
- Decreases periprosthetic fracture risk in osteoporotic bone. 7
Surgical Approach
- Posterior approach with meticulous capsular repair minimizes dislocation risk. 6, 8
- No outcome differences exist between surgical approaches in the general population, but avoid posterior approach if your patient has neurological or cognitive impairment due to increased dislocation risk. 6, 8
Perioperative Management Priorities
- Surgical timing: Operate within 24-48 hours of admission for better outcomes. 1
- Anesthesia: Either spinal or general anesthesia is appropriate (strong recommendation). 1, 7
- Tranexamic acid: Administer at surgery start to reduce blood loss. 7
- Multimodal analgesia: Include preoperative femoral nerve block with regular paracetamol. 6, 7
- Thromboprophylaxis: Use fondaparinux or low molecular weight heparin. 6
- Early mobilization: Weight-bearing as tolerated starting postoperative day one reduces DVT risk and improves functional recovery. 6, 8