For an 85‑year‑old woman with a displaced sub‑capital femoral neck fracture, type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension, should I use a cemented unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 15, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Bipolar vs Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture

For your 85-year-old patient with a displaced subcapital femoral neck fracture, either unipolar or bipolar cemented hemiarthroplasty is appropriate, as they produce equivalent clinical outcomes in mortality, morbidity, and quality of life. 1

Primary Recommendation Based on Guidelines

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) 2022 guidelines provide a moderate strength recommendation that unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty can be equally beneficial for displaced femoral neck fractures. 1 This means you should generally follow this recommendation but remain sensitive to patient-specific factors and cost considerations.

Key Evidence Supporting Equivalence

Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life

  • Multiple high-quality randomized trials demonstrate no significant differences in hip function scores (Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score) between unipolar and bipolar prostheses at 12-month follow-up. 2, 3, 4
  • Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D scores) shows no significant difference between groups, though one study showed a trend toward better quality of life with bipolar at 4 months (0.62 vs 0.54, p=0.06). 3
  • Walking speed and endurance measured by Six-Minute Walk tests are equivalent between both prosthesis types. 4

Complication Rates

  • Dislocation rates are equivalent between unipolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasty. 2
  • Postoperative medical and wound complications occur at similar rates in both groups. 2
  • Revision surgery rates show no significant differences between the two implant types. 2

The Acetabular Erosion Consideration

Common pitfall: Acetabular erosion is often cited as a reason to prefer bipolar prostheses, but its clinical significance is questionable.

  • One randomized trial found 20% acetabular erosion with unipolar versus 5% with bipolar at 12 months (p=0.03). 3
  • However, this radiographic finding showed only trends toward worse outcomes (not statistically significant): Harris Hip Score 70.4 vs 79.3 (p=0.09) and EQ-5D 0.48 vs 0.63 (p=0.13). 3
  • At 36-month follow-up, another study found no functional differences despite theoretical concerns about acetabular wear. 2

Practical Decision Algorithm

Use either unipolar or bipolar based on these factors:

Favor Unipolar When:

  • Cost is a significant institutional concern (unipolar is substantially less expensive). 5, 4
  • Patient has limited pre-injury mobility and is less active. 5
  • Patient has severe osteopenia and is at high risk for periprosthetic fracture (shorter operative time with unipolar). 5

Consider Bipolar When:

  • Patient has better pre-injury functional status and may benefit from theoretical acetabular preservation. 3
  • Institutional cost difference is negligible.
  • Patient or family preference after shared decision-making.

Essential Technical Requirements (Regardless of Choice)

Both prostheses MUST be cemented in your 85-year-old patient with likely osteoporosis. The AAOS provides a strong recommendation for cemented femoral stems in elderly patients undergoing arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. 1, 6, 7 Cemented fixation:

  • Improves hip function. 6
  • Reduces residual pain. 6
  • Decreases periprosthetic fracture risk in osteoporotic bone. 7

Surgical Approach

  • Posterior approach with meticulous capsular repair minimizes dislocation risk. 6, 8
  • No outcome differences exist between surgical approaches in the general population, but avoid posterior approach if your patient has neurological or cognitive impairment due to increased dislocation risk. 6, 8

Perioperative Management Priorities

  • Surgical timing: Operate within 24-48 hours of admission for better outcomes. 1
  • Anesthesia: Either spinal or general anesthesia is appropriate (strong recommendation). 1, 7
  • Tranexamic acid: Administer at surgery start to reduce blood loss. 7
  • Multimodal analgesia: Include preoperative femoral nerve block with regular paracetamol. 6, 7
  • Thromboprophylaxis: Use fondaparinux or low molecular weight heparin. 6
  • Early mobilization: Weight-bearing as tolerated starting postoperative day one reduces DVT risk and improves functional recovery. 6, 8

Long-term Considerations

  • Arrange outpatient DEXA scan and bone health clinic referral for osteoporosis treatment to prevent subsequent fractures. 6, 7
  • Utilize interdisciplinary care programs involving orthopedics, geriatrics, physical therapy, and nursing to decrease complications. 7, 8

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.