In a 10-year-old child who recovered from an upper-respiratory infection two weeks ago and has a family history of leukemia (uncle) and retinoblastoma (brother), what is the most appropriate next step: obtain a complete blood count, order a chest radiograph, refer to ophthalmology, or perform BRCA1/2 testing?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 16, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Most Appropriate Next Step: Reassurance and Routine Follow-Up

In this 10-year-old child who has recovered from an uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infection 2 weeks ago, the most appropriate next step is reassurance and routine follow-up, not immediate laboratory testing or specialist referral. 1

Clinical Context and Risk Assessment

The family history provided does not constitute a hereditary leukemia predisposition syndrome requiring immediate surveillance:

  • Uncle with leukemia is NOT a first-degree relative (first-degree relatives are parents, siblings, and children only), so this does not meet criteria for familial leukemia surveillance 1

  • Brother with retinoblastoma represents a separate cancer predisposition syndrome (RB1 gene mutation) that does not increase leukemia risk and is unrelated to hematologic malignancies 1

  • URTI 2 weeks ago with complete recovery indicates no current signs or symptoms of leukemia (no progressive fatigue, pallor, fever, petechiae, bruising, splenomegaly, or lymphadenopathy) 2, 1

When Surveillance IS Indicated

Intensive hematologic surveillance with CBC every 3-4 months and annual bone marrow evaluation is reserved for children with identified high-risk genetic syndromes including Fanconi anemia, GATA2 deficiency, severe congenital neutropenia, Shwachman-Diamond syndrome, or multiple first-degree relatives with leukemia 2, 1. This child has neither.

Why Each Option Is Inappropriate

A. CBC - Not indicated because:

  • No current symptoms of leukemia or MDS 2, 1
  • Family history does not meet criteria for hereditary leukemia predisposition (uncle is second-degree relative) 1
  • CBC screening has no value in asymptomatic children without specific risk factors 3

B. CXR - Not indicated because:

  • No respiratory symptoms, mediastinal mass concerns, or lymphoma signs 4
  • Child has recovered from URTI 4

C. Ophthalmology referral - Already indicated for the brother with retinoblastoma (who needs surveillance every 3-4 months until age 7), but this patient does not have retinoblastoma and retinoblastoma does not increase leukemia risk 2

D. BRCA1/2 testing - Completely inappropriate because:

  • BRCA1/2 mutations predispose to breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers in adults, NOT leukemia or retinoblastoma 5
  • Neither leukemia nor retinoblastoma are BRCA-associated malignancies 5

Appropriate Management

Provide education about warning signs that should prompt immediate evaluation: progressive fatigue, pallor, unexplained fever, petechiae, easy bruising, splenomegaly, or lymphadenopathy 2, 1. If any of these develop, then CBC with manual differential and reticulocyte count would be appropriate 2.

References

Guideline

Surveillance and Management of Patients with Multiple First-Degree Relatives with Leukemia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Laboratory Testing to Rule Out Lymphoma in Children

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.