Which sign best indicates adequate resuscitation after intravenous fluids: central venous pressure 8 mm Hg, mean arterial pressure 45 mm Hg, urine output 0.1 mL/kg/h, or lactate 2 mmol/L?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 16, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Which Sign Best Indicates Adequate Resuscitation After IV Fluids?

Central venous pressure of 8 mmHg (option A) is the only parameter among these choices that suggests adequate resuscitation, though it must be interpreted alongside other targets—the remaining three options all indicate failed resuscitation requiring immediate intervention.

Analysis of Each Parameter

Option A: CVP 8 mmHg – Acceptable (Part of Bundle)

  • CVP 8–12 mmHg is one component of the comprehensive resuscitation bundle recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, though it should never be used in isolation to guide fluid management 1.
  • The 2017 Surviving Sepsis Campaign explicitly states that CVP alone can no longer justify fluid management decisions, and dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness (passive leg raise, pulse pressure variation) are preferred over static CVP 1.
  • CVP 8 mmHg meets the minimum threshold but must be combined with MAP ≥65 mmHg, urine output ≥0.5 mL/kg/h, lactate <2 mmol/L with ≥10% clearance every 2 hours, and ScvO₂ ≥70% to confirm adequate resuscitation 1.

Option B: MAP 45 mmHg – Critically Inadequate

  • A MAP of 45 mmHg reflects critically inadequate perfusion pressure and ongoing shock, indicating complete failure of resuscitation 1.
  • The Surviving Sepsis Campaign mandates MAP ≥65 mmHg as the fundamental minimum to ensure adequate tissue perfusion in septic patients 1.
  • This patient requires immediate vasopressor initiation (norepinephrine as first-line) in addition to continued fluid resuscitation 1, 2.

Option C: Urine Output 0.1 mL/kg/h – Severe Renal Hypoperfusion

  • The guideline-recommended target is urine output ≥0.5 mL/kg/h for at least 2 hours to indicate restored renal perfusion 1.
  • A urine output of 0.1 mL/kg/h represents severe renal hypoperfusion and inadequate resuscitation, requiring aggressive continuation of fluid therapy 1.
  • This value is five-fold below the acceptable threshold and signals ongoing organ dysfunction 1.

Option D: Lactate 2 mmol/L – Borderline/Inadequate

  • Lactate must be <2 mmol/L with clearance of at least 10% every 2 hours during the first 8 hours to confirm adequate resuscitation 1.
  • A lactate of exactly 2 mmol/L is the upper limit of normal and indicates potential tissue hypoperfusion that warrants continued investigation and intervention 3.
  • Lactate >2 mmol/L persisting beyond 6 hours is associated with significantly increased mortality, and normalization within 24 hours correlates with 100% survival versus only 13.6% if elevated beyond 48 hours 1, 3.
  • In the context of septic shock defined by Sepsis-3, lactate ≥2 mmol/L combined with vasopressor requirement defines septic shock and mandates continued aggressive resuscitation 3.

The Integrated Resuscitation Bundle Approach

Adequate resuscitation cannot be confirmed by any single parameter—all of the following must be achieved simultaneously:

  • MAP ≥65 mmHg 1
  • CVP 8–12 mmHg 1
  • Urine output ≥0.5 mL/kg/h for ≥2 hours 1
  • Lactate <2 mmol/L with ≥10% clearance every 2 hours 1
  • ScvO₂ ≥70% 1
  • Clinical perfusion markers: capillary refill ≤2 seconds, warm extremities, normal mental status 1

Evidence Hierarchy and Strength

  • The 24-hour mean lactate is the strongest independent predictor of mortality in septic shock patients, superior to MAP or other single parameters 4.
  • A prospective multi-national study demonstrated that achieving lactate clearance as a bundle item reduced the relative risk of death by 1.94-fold compared to the primary SSC bundle without lactate clearance 5.
  • Both lactate level and lactate clearance at 6 hours independently predict 28-day mortality (OR 1.27 and 0.992 respectively), though lactate level has slightly higher prognostic value (AUC 0.70 vs 0.65) 6.

Critical Clinical Pitfalls

  • Never rely on CVP alone—it is a static measure with poor predictive value for fluid responsiveness 1.
  • Blood pressure can be maintained through compensatory mechanisms while significant tissue hypoperfusion persists—always measure lactate 3.
  • A single normal lactate does not guarantee sustained recovery—serial measurements every 2–6 hours are essential 3.
  • Duration of lactic acidosis (lactime) is more predictive of multi-organ failure than initial lactate value (R² = 0.266, P <0.001) 7.

Immediate Next Steps for This Patient

Given that three of four parameters indicate inadequate resuscitation:

  • Continue aggressive fluid boluses (250–1000 mL) with hemodynamic reassessment after each bolus 1.
  • Initiate norepinephrine immediately if not already started (MAP 45 mmHg is a vasopressor indication) 1, 2.
  • Remeasure lactate within 2–6 hours to assess response 1.
  • Search for uncontrolled sources of infection or alternative causes of persistent hypoperfusion 1.
  • Target all bundle components simultaneously rather than optimizing one parameter at a time 1, 8.

Related Questions

After intravenous fluid resuscitation, which measurement best indicates that the patient is adequately resuscitated: central venous pressure of 8 mm Hg, mean arterial pressure of 45 mm Hg, urine output of 0.1 mL/kg/h, or lactate level of 2 mmol/L?
In a patient after four‑vessel coronary artery bypass grafting with a lactate level of 3.6 mmol/L (down from 7 and 6 mmol/L), what is the appropriate next management?
What is the lactate clearance rate?
What are the indications for measuring lactate levels?
What is the best indicator of adequate resuscitation in septic shock?
What is the recommended treatment for an intracerebral hemorrhage in a patient with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura?
In a 70‑year‑old skilled‑nursing‑facility resident with diabetes mellitus, a kidney transplant on tacrolimus, a Foley catheter, and recent urinary retention who presents with acute confusion and a normal complete blood count, what are the likely reversible causes and what should the primary‑care physician do next?
In a reproductive‑age woman with a missed intrauterine pregnancy at 7 weeks + 2 days who underwent dilation and curettage, what immediate post‑procedure management (including Rh immunoglobulin, prophylactic antibiotics, analgesia, monitoring, and β‑hCG follow‑up) is indicated?
What is the recommended evaluation and management of an embryonic pregnancy?
How should I evaluate and manage a woman who presents with new dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, pelvic pain, dyspareunia, or hormonal symptoms after undergoing tubal ligation?
What are the age‑related upper reference limits (99th percentile) for cardiac troponin I using high‑sensitivity assays?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.