Adequate Fluid Resuscitation in Burn Patients
CVP = 8 mm Hg (Option C) is the best indicator of adequate fluid resuscitation among these choices, though it should ideally be combined with urine output monitoring targeting 0.5-1 mL/kg/h.
Analysis of Each Option
Option A: Urine Output 0.1 mL/kg/h - INADEQUATE
- This urine output is severely inadequate and indicates under-resuscitation 1, 2
- The target urine output during burn resuscitation should be 0.5-1 mL/kg/h in both adults and children 1, 2, 3
- Urine output is considered the easiest and fastest parameter to guide fluid resuscitation adjustments 1, 2
- A urine output of only 0.1 mL/kg/h represents oliguria and signals inadequate tissue perfusion 1
Option B: MAP = 45 mm Hg - INADEQUATE
- A MAP of 45 mm Hg is critically low and indicates inadequate perfusion 1
- The target MAP during burn resuscitation should be >65 mm Hg 4
- This level of hypotension despite resuscitation suggests either insufficient fluid administration or the need for vasopressor support 1
- Persistent hypotension is associated with worse outcomes and requires immediate intervention 1
Option C: CVP = 8 mm Hg - ADEQUATE
- A CVP of 8 mm Hg falls within the acceptable range of 8-12 cm H₂O used to guide burn resuscitation 5
- This represents adequate central venous filling pressure when combined with other clinical parameters 5
- However, CVP alone should not be the sole endpoint - it must be interpreted alongside urine output, MAP, and lactate 1, 4
- Advanced hemodynamic monitoring including CVP can be particularly valuable in patients with hemodynamic instability or persistent oliguria 1
Option D: Lactate 2 mmol/L - BORDERLINE/ACCEPTABLE
- A lactate of 2 mmol/L is mildly elevated but approaching normal range 4
- During early burn resuscitation, lactate levels are typically elevated (mean 2.58 ± 2.05 mmol/L) and normalize by 24-32 hours with adequate resuscitation 4
- Lactate is a useful marker of tissue perfusion and should be used in combination with other parameters 1, 4
- Lactate levels should be optimized and trending downward with adequate resuscitation 4
Optimal Monitoring Strategy
The best approach combines multiple parameters rather than relying on a single value 1, 4:
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely solely on urine output and vital signs, as they may not reflect adequate central hemodynamic status 4, 6
- Avoid both under-resuscitation and over-resuscitation ("fluid creep"), as both increase morbidity 1, 2
- Early signs of central circulatory hypovolemia may be present at 12 hours despite normal blood pressure and urine output, supporting more rapid initial fluid infusion 6
- Adjust fluid rates promptly based on clinical response rather than rigidly following formulas 1, 2