For a patient who may need a transfusion, should I perform a type‑and‑screen and hold the sample instead of doing a full cross‑match in advance?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 16, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Type and Screen vs. Crossmatch: When to Use Each

For most elective surgical procedures with low transfusion probability, perform a type-and-screen and hold the sample rather than routinely crossmatching units in advance. This approach is 99.99% effective in preventing incompatible transfusions while dramatically improving blood bank efficiency and resource utilization 1, 2.

Clinical Decision Algorithm

Use Type-and-Screen (No Routine Crossmatch) For:

  • Elective surgeries with low transfusion rates (<10% probability of needing blood), including most cesarean sections, abdominal hysterectomies, and vaginal hysterectomies 3, 4
  • Patients with negative antibody screens who have no history of clinically significant antibodies 1, 2
  • Non-bleeding patients in obstetric and gynecologic settings, even those considered high-risk 4

Perform Full Crossmatch in Advance For:

  • Massive hemorrhage or active bleeding requiring immediate transfusion 5
  • Patients with positive antibody screens or known clinically significant antibodies 1, 2
  • Sickle cell disease patients requiring extended antigen matching beyond ABO/RhD 5
  • Procedures with high transfusion probability (>50% likelihood of needing blood) 3

How Type-and-Screen Works

The type-and-screen protocol involves:

  • ABO and RhD typing of the patient 5
  • Antibody screening using reagent red cells to detect clinically significant antibodies 1, 2
  • No crossmatch performed unless transfusion becomes necessary 1, 2

If transfusion is needed: Compatible blood can be provided within 15-20 minutes by performing an immediate crossmatch or issuing type-specific blood after a 15-second saline spin 2, 3, 4.

Safety and Effectiveness

The type-and-screen method is 99.99% effective in preventing incompatible transfusions because screening reagent red cells detect 96% of clinically significant antibodies, and when antigen frequencies are considered, the incompatibility risk becomes negligible 1, 2.

The immediate spin crossmatch performed when blood is actually needed provides additional safety by:

  • Verifying ABO compatibility at the time of issue 2
  • Detecting high-titer antibodies against low-incidence antigens that may not be present on screening cells 2

Efficiency and Resource Benefits

Implementing type-and-screen protocols yields substantial improvements:

  • Turnaround time reduction: First transfusion TAT decreased from 71.56 to 51.24 minutes; subsequent transfusions from 39.67 to 17.47 minutes 6
  • Man-hour savings: 0.33 man-hours saved per sample, totaling 11.6 man-days in one study 6
  • Crossmatch-to-transfusion ratio improvement: From 17.6:1 to 4.9:1 in obstetric patients, eliminating 964 unnecessary crossmatches over 3 months 4
  • Cost savings: $14,460 saved in 3 months in one obstetric service 4

Critical Timing Considerations

The 72-hour validity rule is paramount for patient safety:

  • Standard validity: Type-and-screen samples remain valid for 72 hours (3 calendar days) from collection to transfusion 7
  • Recent transfusion/pregnancy: If the patient received transfusion or was pregnant within the past 3 months, the sample expires after only 72 hours due to rapid antibody development risk 7
  • Beyond 72 hours: A new sample is mandatory regardless of transfusion history 7

This rule prevents delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions from newly formed antibodies not detected on the original screen 7.

Emergency Situations

In true emergencies requiring immediate transfusion:

  • Group O RhD-negative blood is the safest choice when patient type is unknown 5
  • Group O RhD-positive is acceptable for male patients to preserve O-negative inventory 5
  • Group-specific blood can be issued within 10 minutes once ABO/RhD typing is complete, accepting slightly higher risk in massive bleeding scenarios where circulating antibodies are diluted 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not use type-and-screen if:

  • The facility lacks adequate blood inventory reserves readily available for emergency crossmatching 2
  • The patient has a history of clinically significant antibodies requiring extended workup 1
  • Laboratory turnaround time for emergency crossmatch exceeds 20-30 minutes 2, 3

Always ensure:

  • Positive patient identification with two identifiers before sample collection 5
  • Samples are labeled at the patient's bedside 5
  • Two samples are available for initial testing unless a valid historical sample exists 5

Related Questions

What is the validity period of a type and screen (blood typing and antibody screening)?
What is a type and screen (blood typing and antibody screening)?
What test should I order to find out my blood type in an outpatient setting?
Does a type and screen (T&S) test determine blood type?
What is an antibody screen?
In a 6‑week‑old infant with a unilateral absent red reflex (leukocoria) in the left eye and normal development, what is the most likely diagnosis?
What are the recommended doses of propofol and remifentanil for sedation during coronary angiography in a typical adult patient (approximately 70 kg, ASA II‑III, normal renal and hepatic function, and no severe left ventricular dysfunction)?
What is the step‑by‑step management of ACE‑inhibitor‑induced hyperkalemia?
For suspected lymphoma, should the initial diagnostic step be a fine‑needle aspiration (FNA) or an excisional/incisional (core‑needle) biopsy?
In an older adult with chronic diastolic heart failure, atrial fibrillation with a ventricular pacemaker, anemia treated with ferrous sulfate, obesity, recent 2‑lb weight gain, who experienced two brief episodes of sharp left‑sided chest pain with dyspnea on exertion when beginning to walk, and whose ECG shows a ventricular‑paced rhythm at 69 bpm with blood pressure 126/76 mmHg and heart rate 70 bpm, what is the appropriate immediate evaluation and management?
In an adult with community‑acquired pneumonia who has severe hypercapnia (elevated arterial PaCO₂), hypoxemia (low arterial PaO₂) and an arterial pH of 7.1, should I proceed with elective endotracheal intubation rather than use BiPAP?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.