What is the first‑line pharmacologic regimen for an adult with heart failure and a left‑ventricular ejection fraction of 40‑45% (HFmrEF)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 16, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

First-Line Treatment for Heart Failure with EF 40-45%

Patients with heart failure and ejection fraction of 40-45% (HFmrEF) should be treated with the same four-pillar guideline-directed medical therapy as HFrEF: an ARNI (sacubitril/valsartan preferred over ACE inhibitor/ARB), evidence-based beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and SGLT2 inhibitor, initiated rapidly and titrated to target doses. 1, 2

Understanding the EF 40-45% Category

  • An ejection fraction of 40-45% is classified as heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), which follows a dynamic trajectory and warrants the same therapeutic approach as HFrEF. 1, 2
  • This EF range is NOT preserved ejection fraction—approximately 27% of HFmrEF patients decline to LVEF ≤40%, while 45% improve to LVEF ≥50%, making aggressive early treatment critical. 2
  • The threshold for considering RAAS inhibitor therapy is an EF <50% because of the preservation of cavity size in patients with advanced systolic failure. 1

The Four-Pillar Pharmacologic Regimen

1. ARNI (Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor)

  • Initiate sacubitril/valsartan as first-line therapy rather than ACE inhibitor or ARB—post-hoc analyses demonstrate superior reduction in HF hospitalization and mortality even in the mildly reduced EF range. 2
  • If ACE inhibitor is used instead, start at low doses and titrate upward to doses proven in clinical trials (e.g., enalapril 10-20 mg twice daily, lisinopril 20-40 mg daily). 3
  • ARBs are an alternative only if ACE inhibitors or ARNI are not tolerated due to intolerable adverse effects, as the evidence base is stronger for ACE inhibitors. 3
  • Target at least 50% of the evidence-based target dose for these medications. 3

2. Evidence-Based Beta-Blockers

  • Prescribe one of three beta-blockers proven to reduce mortality: bisoprolol, carvedilol, or metoprolol succinate (sustained-release) for all patients with current or prior symptoms and LVEF <50%. 3, 1, 2
  • Beta-blockers should be initiated concurrently with ARNI, as they confer mortality benefit in all patients with LVEF <50% regardless of symptom status. 2
  • Use a "start-low, go-slow" approach with gradual incremental dose increases if lower doses are well tolerated, reviewing heart rate, blood pressure, and clinical status after each titration. 3
  • Make every effort to achieve target doses shown effective in major clinical trials (e.g., carvedilol 25 mg twice daily, metoprolol succinate 200 mg daily, bisoprolol 10 mg daily). 3

3. Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRAs)

  • Add spironolactone or eplerenone for patients with persisting symptoms (NYHA Class II-IV) and LVEF <50% despite treatment with ARNI/ACE inhibitor and beta-blocker, to reduce HF hospitalization and premature death. 1
  • MRAs are contraindicated if eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² or serum potassium >5.0 mmol/L, requiring close monitoring of renal function and potassium levels. 2
  • MRAs specifically reduce sudden cardiac death in addition to all-cause mortality. 3

4. SGLT2 Inhibitors

  • Prescribe dapagliflozin or empagliflozin irrespective of diabetes status, as this class reduces cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization across the full spectrum of reduced and mildly reduced EF. 1, 2
  • SGLT2 inhibitors are highly effective, well-tolerated, easy to use, and have Class I, Level A guideline recommendation—they consistently demonstrate substantial relative and absolute risk reductions. 3
  • This is the newest pillar of therapy and should not be omitted despite being the most recent addition. 4, 5

Practical Implementation Strategy

Rapid Sequential Initiation

  • Initiate all four medication classes as early as possible to establish effective therapy, even at low doses—this is preferable to starting fewer medications at maximum dose. 6, 7
  • The goal is to introduce all four drug classes within 4-6 weeks, followed by an 8-week dose up-titration period. 7
  • Adjust therapies no more frequently than every 2 weeks to target doses or maximally tolerated doses. 3
  • Most patients should achieve optimal treatment protocol within 2 months, which should be the treatment goal. 6

Monitoring Requirements

  • Schedule clinical follow-up every 3-6 months initially to assess symptom emergence, medication tolerance, blood pressure, renal function, and serum potassium. 2
  • Repeat transthoracic echocardiography every 6-12 months to track LVEF trajectory and identify either improvement (HFimpEF) or progression to HFrEF. 2
  • Monitor renal function regularly when taking ACE inhibitors/ARNI, particularly when dose is increased or when other medications affecting renal function are added. 8

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do NOT postpone GDMT awaiting symptom development—early treatment in asymptomatic LV dysfunction reduces mortality and prevents progression to overt HF. 2
  • Do NOT rely on a single LVEF measurement for definitive therapeutic decisions; obtain two consecutive LVEF measurements to avoid misclassification due to measurement variability. 2
  • Do NOT discontinue GDMT if LVEF improves above 40% (HFimpEF)—abrupt discontinuation is associated with relapse of LV dysfunction and clinical HF. 1, 2
  • Avoid calcium channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem, short-acting dihydropyridines), Class I antiarrhythmics, NSAIDs, and COX-2 inhibitors, as they worsen heart failure outcomes. 8

Additional Considerations

  • Diuretics should be added as needed for fluid retention, but they do not reduce mortality or sudden death. 3
  • Device therapy (ICD, CRT) is not routinely indicated in patients with LVEF 41-49% unless EF declines to ≤35% after 3-6 months of optimal medical therapy. 2
  • Aggressive treatment of hypertension and hyperlipidemia is especially important in those with prior ischemic events. 2

Related Questions

What is the initial approach to managing air hunger and anxiety in a patient with chronic systolic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction?
What are the risks, benefits, and side effects of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) for patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)?
What is the treatment for a patient with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40%?
What is the optimal management strategy for an elderly patient with HFmrEF, A-fib, and moderate-severe mitral regurgitation, currently on guideline-directed medical therapy?
How to manage heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)?
What initial levothyroxine dose should be started in a newly diagnosed hypothyroid pregnant woman based on her pre‑pregnancy weight?
Is non-purulent cellulitis associated with leukocytosis?
Can oral dexamethasone cause hypotension, particularly after prolonged high‑dose use or abrupt discontinuation in elderly patients with heart failure or on antihypertensive therapy?
What is the recommended emergency department management of an acute ankle ligament sprain in an adult patient without contraindications to NSAIDs or significant comorbidities?
What are the differential diagnoses and immediate emergency management for an unconscious 14‑year‑old female?
For a 19‑year‑old college student with suspected acute bacterial meningitis, which isolation precautions should be ordered now: airborne and contact, standard and droplet, surgical mask only, or standard and contact?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.