How long should a fully‑covered self‑expandable metal stent (SEMS) be left in place for a refractory caustic esophageal stricture?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 16, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Duration of Fully Covered SEMS Placement for Refractory Caustic Esophageal Stricture

For refractory caustic esophageal strictures, fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) should be placed for 4-8 weeks, with a maximum duration not exceeding 3 months under any circumstances due to the risk of stent embedding. 1

Optimal Stent Duration

  • The standard duration for FCSEMS placement is 4-8 weeks for most refractory benign esophageal strictures, including caustic strictures 1, 2

  • Caustic strictures may benefit from placement toward the longer end of this window (6-8 weeks) given their tendency to be longer and more severe, with recurrence rates as high as 69% after stent removal, particularly for strictures >7 cm 1, 2

  • The absolute maximum duration is 3 months (12 weeks), after which the risk of stent embedding becomes prohibitive and may preclude safe removal 1, 3, 2

Evidence Supporting This Timeframe

The UK guidelines on esophageal dilatation provide the strongest evidence base for this recommendation:

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that the majority of refractory strictures respond to stent placement between 4 and 8 weeks 1

  • Longer periods of up to 3 months may be required for particularly challenging strictures, but stents should not be left longer than this owing to embedding risk 1

  • Supporting research confirms that covered stent placement for 6-8 weeks is safe and effective for benign esophageal conditions 4, with one study specifically using 8 weeks for esophageal perforations and leaks with 91% healing success 5

Critical Safety Considerations

Stent embedding is the primary concern that limits duration:

  • Partially or uncovered metal stents must be absolutely avoided in benign strictures due to tissue ingrowth that prevents safe removal 1, 3, 2

  • Only fully covered SEMS should be used for caustic strictures 3, 2

Other important adverse events occur in approximately 20% of patients and include chest pain, bleeding, perforation, and aspiration pneumonia 1, 3

Stent migration occurs in approximately 30% of cases with both metal and plastic stents, though metal stents have lower migration rates than plastic stents 1, 3, 2

Special Considerations for Caustic Strictures

  • Caustic strictures have particularly poor outcomes with intralesional steroid therapy, with randomized controlled trials failing to show improvement and even demonstrating increased complications 1

  • These strictures often require re-treatment after stent removal, with research showing that even with optimal stent placement for 4-6 weeks, corrosive strictures had higher recurrence rates compared to peptic or post-sclerotherapy strictures 6

  • Do not dilate within 3 weeks of initial caustic ingestion due to higher perforation risk 7

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not extend stent duration beyond 3 months, even if clinical improvement is incomplete, as embedding risk becomes prohibitive 3, 2

  • Do not rely solely on symptom improvement to determine removal timing—adhere to the 4-8 week (maximum 12 week) timeframe regardless of clinical response 2

  • Do not use partially covered or uncovered stents in this benign condition, as tissue ingrowth prevents safe removal 3, 2

  • Ensure patients provide informed consent regarding the 20% adverse event rate and 30% migration risk before stent placement 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Corrosive Pyloric Stricture with Covered Metal Stents

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Esophageal Stent Placement Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Self-expanding metal stent in esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks.

Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2020

Research

Fully covered self-expanding metallic stent placement for benign refractory esophageal strictures.

Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2017

Guideline

Management of Refractory Esophageal Strictures

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.