LBBB vs RBBB: ECG Differentiation and Clinical Significance
ECG Diagnostic Criteria
The key to distinguishing RBBB from LBBB is examining QRS morphology in leads V1 and V6: RBBB shows an rSR' (M-shaped) pattern in V1 with wide S waves in V6, while LBBB shows broad notched R waves in V6 with deep S waves in V1. 1
RBBB ECG Features
- QRS duration ≥120 ms 1
- rSR', rsR', or rSR' pattern in V1-V2 (M-shaped or "rabbit ears") 1, 2
- Wide S waves in leads I and V6 (>40 ms or longer than R wave) 2
- R peak time >50 ms in V1 but normal in V5-V6 1, 2
- Septal Q waves preserved in leads I, V5-V6 1
LBBB ECG Features
- QRS duration ≥120 ms 1
- Broad notched or slurred R waves in leads I, aVL, V5, and V6 1, 2
- Deep S waves or QS pattern in V1 1
- Absent Q waves in leads I, V5, and V6 (due to abnormal right-to-left septal activation) 1, 3
- R peak time >60 ms in V5-V6 1, 2
Clinical Significance: A Critical Distinction
LBBB is far more ominous than RBBB and represents a strong marker of underlying structural cardiovascular disease, potentially indicating ischemic heart disease or cardiomyopathy years before structural changes become detectable. 1, 2
LBBB Clinical Implications
- Very rare in healthy individuals and almost always pathologic 4, 2
- Strong association with structural heart disease: may be the first manifestation of ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, hypertensive heart disease, or diffuse myocardial disease 4, 2, 3
- Up to 90% of LBBB patients have anatomic left ventricular hypertrophy at autopsy 4, 1
- Induces ventricular dyssynchrony leading to abnormal contraction patterns, asymmetric hypertrophy, and potential LV dilatation 3
- Higher acute complications: In acute MI, LBBB patients have the highest rates of pulmonary edema (18.8%) and cardiogenic shock compared to RBBB (12.0%) or isolated STEMI (7.9%) 5
- Even asymptomatic LBBB mandates cardiology evaluation given strong disease association 2
RBBB Clinical Implications
- May represent benign isolated finding in up to 1% of the general population, particularly in younger individuals 1, 2
- Can be idiopathic and clinically benign or represent underlying pathology (ischemic disease, cardiomyopathies, congenital heart disease, ARVC) 4, 2
- Less commonly associated with structural disease than LBBB 4
- Prognostic significance depends on LV function: RBBB predicts increased mortality primarily in patients with reduced LV systolic function (wall motion index ≤1.5), whereas LBBB predicts mortality even with preserved LV function 6
Diagnostic Workup Requirements
Both complete RBBB and LBBB require comprehensive cardiological evaluation, but the urgency and concern are greater with LBBB. 4, 2
Mandatory Evaluation for Bundle Branch Block
- Exercise stress testing to assess for exercise-induced arrhythmias or conduction worsening 4, 2
- 24-hour Holter monitoring to detect intermittent conduction abnormalities 4, 2
- Echocardiography to evaluate for structural heart disease including cardiomyopathies, ischemic disease, hypertensive heart disease, and ARVC 4, 2
Special Considerations
- In young athletes with bifascicular block (LBBB or RBBB with left posterior hemiblock), obtain ECG in siblings to exclude genetically determined progressive cardiac conduction disease (Lenegre disease) 2
- Intermittent or rate-dependent LBBB has the same clinical and prognostic significance as stable LBBB 4, 2
Impact on Other ECG Interpretations
Acute MI Diagnosis
- RBBB preserves ST-segment interpretation for acute MI diagnosis 1
- LBBB significantly complicates ECG diagnosis of acute MI 1
- RBBB with concomitant ST elevation carries particularly high mortality risk (OR 1.77) compared to isolated STEMI 5
LVH Diagnosis
- LBBB makes LVH diagnosis nearly impossible on ECG 1
- Only diagnose LVH with LBBB if: QRS duration >155 ms, left atrial abnormality present, AND precordial voltage criteria met—though sensitivity remains low 4, 2
- RBBB reduces sensitivity for LVH detection by reducing S wave amplitude in right precordial leads 4, 2
- With RBBB, use ancillary features: left atrial abnormality, left axis deviation, and specific criteria (SV1 >2 mm, RV5-6 >15 mm) 4
Left Anterior Fascicular Block Considerations
- QRS vector shifts posteriorly and superiorly with larger R waves in I and aVL, deeper S waves in V5-V6 4, 2
- R-wave amplitude in I and aVL becomes unreliable for LVH diagnosis 4, 2
- Prevalence 0.5-1.0% in general population under age 40 4, 2
Prognostic Implications
Mortality Data
- Long-term mortality after MI: RBBB carries HR 1.23 while LBBB HR 1.05 in multivariable analysis, but this varies significantly by LV function 6
- In-hospital MACE rates: highest with LBBB (13.9%) vs RBBB (9.9%) vs isolated STEMI (6.7%), driven primarily by mortality 5
- Bifascicular blocks (combinations of bundle branch block and hemiblock) reflect extensive conduction system involvement and carry increased risk of clinically significant AV block 4, 2
Mechanical Dyssynchrony
- LBBB shows higher prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony (54-63% depending on criteria) compared to pure RBBB (29-33%) 7
- This dyssynchrony may lead to "latent cardiomyopathy": normal LV dimensions and ejection fraction at rest but abnormal pulmonary artery pressure during exercise, lactate production during pacing, and ischemic scintigraphic findings without coronary disease 3