What are the current CLSI susceptibility breakpoints for gentamicin and cefepime for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 16, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Breakpoints for Gentamicin and Cefepime

Current CLSI Breakpoints for Enterobacterales

For Enterobacterales, the CLSI 2023 breakpoints for gentamicin are ≤2 mg/L (susceptible), 4 mg/L (intermediate), and ≥8 mg/L (resistant), representing a significant reduction from the previous ≤4/≥16 mg/L criteria. 1

Gentamicin Breakpoints

  • Susceptible: ≤2 mg/L
  • Intermediate: 4 mg/L
  • Resistant: ≥8 mg/L 1

The CLSI lowered these breakpoints in 2023 from the previous criteria of ≤4 mg/L (susceptible) and ≥16 mg/L (resistant) to align with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters used for other antimicrobials. 1

Cefepime Breakpoints for Enterobacterales

  • Susceptible: ≤4 mg/L (zone diameter ≥15 mm)
  • Intermediate: 8 mg/L (zone diameter 13-14 mm)
  • Resistant: ≥16 mg/L (zone diameter ≤12 mm) 2

These newer cefepime breakpoints may fail to identify many ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, as some ESBL-producing isolates remain susceptible to cefepime under the current criteria. 3, 4

Current CLSI Breakpoints for Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Gentamicin Breakpoints

  • Susceptible: ≤4 mg/L (zone diameter ≥15 mm)
  • Intermediate: 8 mg/L (zone diameter 13-14 mm)
  • Resistant: ≥16 mg/L (zone diameter ≤12 mm) 2

Note that Pseudomonas aeruginosa retained the older breakpoint criteria for gentamicin (≤4/≥16 mg/L), unlike Enterobacterales which had more stringent criteria applied. 2

Cefepime Breakpoints for Pseudomonas aeruginosa

  • Susceptible: ≤4 mg/L (zone diameter ≥15 mm)
  • Intermediate: 8 mg/L (zone diameter 13-14 mm)
  • Resistant: ≥16 mg/L (zone diameter ≤12 mm) 2

For Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, achieving cefepime exposures of >60% fT>MIC (percentage of time the free drug concentration remains above the MIC) is critical to minimize microbiological failure, which typically requires doses of at least 2 g every 8 hours in patients with normal renal function. 5

Clinical Impact of Breakpoint Changes

Effect on Enterobacterales Susceptibility Reporting

  • The 2023 CLSI breakpoint changes for gentamicin drastically reduced susceptibility rates for multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales from 94.0% to 71.0%, for ESBL-producing isolates from 96.9% to 79.7%, and for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales from 75.2% to 59.0%. 1

  • For cefepime, the resistance rate in Escherichia coli increased from 2.1% to 8.2% and in Enterobacter cloacae from 1.3% to 6.9% when comparing older CLSI criteria to EUCAST 2011 guidelines. 6

Effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Susceptibility Reporting

  • Cefepime resistance rates in P. aeruginosa increased from 12.2% to 19.8% when comparing CLSI 2009-2011 with EUCAST 2011 guidelines. 6

Important Clinical Caveats

ESBL-Producing Organisms

  • ESBL-producing bacteria demonstrate resistance to all cephalosporins, including cefepime, despite some isolates appearing susceptible by current breakpoints. 7

  • Carbapenems remain the treatment of choice for serious ESBL infections, as ESBL enzymes hydrolyze all cephalosporins including cefepime. 7

  • Routine ESBL confirmatory testing is no longer required before reporting results under newer interpretive criteria, but remains valuable for epidemiological surveillance and infection control. 7

Aminoglycoside Limitations

  • For Salmonella and Shigella species, aminoglycosides including gentamicin may appear active in vitro but are not effective clinically, and results should not be reported as susceptible. 2

  • For staphylococci that test susceptible to gentamicin, aminoglycosides are used only in combination with other active agents, not as monotherapy. 2

  • Co-resistance to aminoglycosides is frequently observed in ESBL-producing organisms. 7

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.