In a patient with grade II diastolic dysfunction on a two‑dimensional echocardiogram and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 72%, does this constitute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 16, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Grade II Diastolic Dysfunction with LVEF 72%: Does This Constitute HFpEF?

Grade II diastolic dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 72% does NOT automatically constitute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction—the diagnosis requires the presence of typical heart failure symptoms (dyspnea, orthopnea, fatigue) or signs (pulmonary crackles, peripheral edema, elevated JVP) PLUS elevated natriuretic peptides or other objective evidence of elevated filling pressures. 1, 2

Core Diagnostic Requirements for HFpEF

The diagnosis of HFpEF demands three mandatory components that must all be present simultaneously:

  • Clinical syndrome: Typical heart failure symptoms (exertional dyspnea, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea) and/or signs (pulmonary crackles, peripheral edema, elevated jugular venous pressure, S4 gallop) 1, 2

  • Preserved systolic function: LVEF ≥ 50% on transthoracic echocardiography—your patient's LVEF of 72% clearly meets this threshold 1, 2

  • Objective evidence of cardiac dysfunction: Either elevated natriuretic peptides (BNP >35 pg/mL or NT-proBNP >125 pg/mL in ambulatory setting) OR echocardiographic evidence of structural/functional abnormalities such as E/e' ratio >9–15, left atrial enlargement (LAVI), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVMI), or elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure >35 mmHg 1, 2, 3

The Critical Distinction: Diastolic Dysfunction ≠ Heart Failure

Diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF are NOT identical entities—this is a common diagnostic pitfall. 4

  • Grade II diastolic dysfunction represents an echocardiographic finding that indicates impaired left ventricular relaxation and elevated filling pressures 4, 3

  • HFpEF is a clinical syndrome requiring symptoms/signs of heart failure in addition to the structural/functional abnormalities 1, 2, 5

  • Many patients have diastolic dysfunction on echocardiography but remain asymptomatic and do not meet criteria for HFpEF 4, 6

Algorithmic Approach to This Patient

Step 1: Assess for Heart Failure Symptoms and Signs

If the patient is asymptomatic or has only non-specific symptoms:

  • This represents diastolic dysfunction without heart failure 4, 6
  • Aggressive management of underlying risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, obesity) is indicated to prevent progression 1, 3
  • Serial monitoring with echocardiography and clinical assessment is warranted 2

If typical HF symptoms/signs are present, proceed to Step 2 1, 2

Step 2: Obtain Natriuretic Peptide Levels

  • Measure BNP or NT-proBNP to confirm the diagnosis and exclude non-cardiac causes of dyspnea 1, 2
  • Markedly elevated values provide diagnostic certainty for HFpEF 2
  • Normal natriuretic peptides make HFpEF unlikely unless measured during diuretic therapy 1

Step 3: Integrate Echocardiographic Parameters

No single echocardiographic parameter is sufficient for diagnosis—an integrated assessment is required: 4, 3

  • E/e' ratio: Values >15 indicate high filling pressures; values 9–15 are intermediate 1, 3
  • Left atrial volume index (LAVI): Enlargement reflects chronic elevation of filling pressures 4, 1
  • Left ventricular mass index (LVMI): Increased wall thickness from chronic hypertension 1
  • Tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV): Elevated pulmonary artery pressure >35 mmHg 1

Step 4: Exclude HFpEF Mimics

Before confirming HFpEF, systematically rule out conditions requiring different treatment: 3

  • Cardiac amyloidosis (especially in elderly patients)
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Significant valvular disease (aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation)
  • Pericardial constriction
  • High-output heart failure
  • Infiltrative cardiomyopathies (sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis, Fabry disease) 1, 3

Management Implications

If HFpEF is confirmed (symptoms + elevated natriuretic peptides + structural abnormalities):

  • Initiate SGLT2 inhibitor (empagliflozin 10 mg or dapagliflozin 10 mg daily) as first-line disease-modifying therapy—this reduces cardiovascular death and HF hospitalizations 2, 3

  • Add mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (spironolactone) to reduce morbidity and mortality 3

  • Use loop diuretics judiciously for congestion management, not as disease-modifying therapy 3

  • Aggressively manage comorbidities: target blood pressure <130/80 mmHg, optimize diabetes control, address obesity, manage atrial fibrillation if present 1, 3

If only diastolic dysfunction without HF symptoms:

  • Focus on risk factor modification: aggressive blood pressure control, weight loss, diabetes management 1, 7
  • Serial clinical and echocardiographic monitoring to detect progression 2
  • Patient education about symptoms that should prompt re-evaluation 6

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not diagnose HFpEF based solely on echocardiographic diastolic dysfunction—clinical symptoms and elevated natriuretic peptides are mandatory 4, 1, 2

  • Do not rely on E/e' ratio alone—it shows only modest correlation with invasive filling pressures in HFpEF populations and must be integrated with other parameters 4, 3

  • Do not overlook HFpEF mimics—cardiac amyloidosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy require specific therapies and have different prognoses 3

  • Do not assume all dyspnea in elderly patients with diastolic dysfunction is HFpEF—comorbidities (obesity, deconditioning, pulmonary disease, anemia) frequently contribute to symptoms and must be addressed 6, 7

References

Guideline

Diagnosis and Confirmation of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Evidence‑Based Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure by Ejection‑Fraction

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Clinical medicine (London, England), 2018

Related Questions

Is a preserved ejection fraction equivalent to diastolic heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction equivalent to systolic heart failure?
What are the diagnostic criteria for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)?
In a 68-year-old man with hypertension, dyspnea, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, blood pressure 170/100, basal crackles, S4 gallop, systolic murmur, echocardiographic ejection fraction 55% with left‑ventricular hypertrophy and no wall‑motion or valvular abnormalities, which diagnosis is most likely: heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, ischemic cardiomyopathy, or cor pulmonale with right‑ventricular failure?
What is the recommended initial management for a patient with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%) presenting with dyspnea or fatigue?
What are the diagnostic criteria for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)?
What is the most appropriate over‑the‑counter treatment for simultaneous abdominal cramps and diarrhea?
When should SIMV be used instead of assist‑control in an adult patient who has been mechanically ventilated for more than a week?
In a 35-year-old female with acute appendicitis scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy who has a history of asthma and a fever >38 °C, which measure most improves surgical safety: (A) proper operative site marking and preparation of surgical equipment, (B) pre‑operative intravenous antibiotics, (C) ignoring the asthma history, or (D) omitting informed consent because the procedure is minor?
In a 35-year-old woman with acute appendicitis, fever >38 °C, and well‑controlled asthma scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy, which intervention most improves surgical or patient safety?
What evaluation and management steps are recommended for a healthy 24‑year‑old man who has stopped having normal morning erections?
What is the recommended approach to evaluate and treat anxiety, panic attacks, insomnia, and depression in a patient with a catecholamine‑producing paraganglioma?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.