Serum Biomarkers for Dementia and Preclinical Disease
The most clinically validated serum biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and its preclinical phase are plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau217, p-tau181, p-tau231), plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL), with plasma p-tau showing the strongest performance for detecting AD pathology across all disease stages. 1
Core Blood-Based Biomarkers
Plasma Phosphorylated Tau (p-tau)
- Plasma p-tau (particularly p-tau217) is the most promising blood biomarker for symptomatic AD, demonstrating areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.92-0.98 for predicting amyloid status and showing excellent performance during both preclinical and symptomatic disease stages 2, 3
- P-tau181, p-tau217, and p-tau231 isoforms all demonstrate desirable sensitivity and specificity for identifying individuals with AD pathology 3
- Plasma p-tau181 achieves an AUC of 0.78-0.81 for discriminating A+T+ from A-T- participants, with moderate correlation to CSF levels (Rho=0.51) 4
- P-tau biomarkers may be combined with APOE genotype or Aβ42/Aβ40 during prodromal disease stages for enhanced accuracy 1
Plasma Amyloid Beta (Aβ42/Aβ40 Ratio)
- Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio reflects selective depletion of Aβ42 due to cerebral plaque deposition, similar to CSF patterns 1
- The major limitation is the small fold change between Aβ-positive and Aβ-negative individuals (only 8-15% reduction compared to 40-60% in CSF), making it less robust than p-tau markers 1
- Immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry (IP-MS) methods achieve AUC of 0.86 for detecting Aβ pathology, outperforming immunoassays (AUC 0.69-0.78) 1
- Plasma Aβ composite shows AUC of 0.75 for discriminating positive and negative participants, with moderate correlation to CSF Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 (Rho=-0.5) 4
- Levels are fully changed during pre-symptomatic disease stages, allowing identification of Aβ pathology in cognitively unimpaired individuals with accuracies comparable to symptomatic patients 1
Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL)
- Plasma NfL is a non-specific marker of neuronal injury and neurodegeneration, not exclusive to AD but useful across multiple neurodegenerative diseases 1, 5, 3
- NfL demonstrates high correlation between plasma and CSF levels (Rho=0.78), with AUC of 0.88 for discriminating neurodegeneration categories 4
- Can detect onset of neurodegeneration in mutation carriers entering the clinical disease phase 1
- Useful for monitoring disease-modifying treatment effects, as demonstrated in multiple sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy, and HIV-associated neurocognitive dysfunction 1
Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP)
- GFAP is a marker of neuro-immune activation and astrocytic response, showing promise for AD identification 1, 3
- Demonstrates desirable sensitivity and specificity for identifying individuals with AD pathology and dementia 3
Biomarker Staging Framework
Preclinical AD Classification
The biomarker model follows a temporal sequence where markers become abnormal in ordered stages 1:
Stage 1: Amyloid positivity alone
- Detectable via reduced plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio
- Represents earliest detectable pathological change
- May precede clinical symptoms by more than a decade 1
Stage 2: Amyloid positivity + neurodegeneration markers
- Elevated plasma p-tau (reflecting neuronal injury)
- Elevated NfL (reflecting axonal damage)
- Individuals at this stage are farther along the disease trajectory 1
Stage 3: Amyloid + neurodegeneration + subtle cognitive decline
- All biomarkers abnormal plus emerging cognitive changes
- Approaching the border with mild cognitive impairment 1
Clinical Application Guidelines
Current Appropriate Use
Blood biomarkers with established thresholds (especially plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-tau) can be used as first-line screening tools, but AD status must be confirmed with PET or CSF before clinical decisions or trial enrollment 1
Key Limitations and Caveats
- Blood biomarkers currently require confirmation and should not be used as stand-alone diagnostic tools in clinical practice, as positive predictive values need to exceed 90-95% for definitive diagnosis 1
- The combination of plasma Aβ composite, pTau181, and NfL does not outperform pTau181 alone for discriminating A+T+ from A-T- participants 4
- Complement C3 and alpha-2-macroglobulin, despite initial promise, have not demonstrated sufficient predictive value for clinical use 6
Clinical Trial Applications
- Blood biomarkers substantially reduce screening costs and time for trial enrollment, as demonstrated by the A4 trial requiring 3.5 years and >4000 amyloid PET scans to enroll 1169 participants 1
- In non-AD trials, plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-tau can exclude patients with AD co-pathology 1
- Plasma NfL is being used to screen for genetic neurodegenerative diseases like frontotemporal dementia with GRN or MAPT mutations 1
Practical Algorithm for Biomarker Use
For symptomatic patients (MCI or dementia):
- Measure plasma p-tau (preferably p-tau217) as primary screening marker 1, 3
- Add plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 if p-tau results are equivocal 1
- Confirm positive results with CSF or amyloid PET before treatment decisions 1
For preclinical/asymptomatic individuals:
- Combine plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 with p-tau for optimal detection 1
- Consider APOE genotype as adjunctive risk stratification 1
- Mandatory confirmation with PET or CSF required before any intervention 1
- Treatment is inappropriate for cognitively unimpaired individuals even with positive biomarkers 2, 7
For monitoring neurodegeneration: