Can the radial artery be stented in a patient with hand ischemia due to a dialysis access fistula or focal radial‑artery stenosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 17, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Radial Artery Stenting in Dialysis-Associated Hand Ischemia

Yes, the radial artery can be stented when focal stenosis of the inflow artery is contributing to hand ischemia in dialysis patients, though this represents a limited and specific indication within a broader treatment algorithm. 1

Primary Treatment Context

Radial artery stenting is not a first-line intervention for dialysis-associated steal syndrome (DASS), but rather serves as an adjunctive endovascular option when specific anatomical lesions are identified. 1

When Radial Artery Stenting Is Appropriate

Angioplasty with or without stent placement of the radial artery is indicated when:

  • Focal stenosis of the inflow radial artery is identified on fistulography that is contributing to inadequate perfusion of both the fistula and the hand 1
  • The stenosis is proximal to the arteriovenous anastomosis and limiting flow 1
  • Complete arteriography from aortic arch to palmar arch has been performed to identify all culprit lesions 1

The Endovascular Treatment Algorithm

For DASS with identified arterial stenosis:

  1. Diagnostic fistulography must include complete arteriography with and without occlusion of the AV access to identify all stenotic segments 1

  2. Angioplasty ± stenting of culprit stenoses in the radial artery (or other inflow vessels like subclavian or brachial arteries) can be performed to augment blood flow to both the fistula and hand 1

  3. Combined procedures are often most effective: distal radial artery embolization combined with angioplasty of any ulnar artery stenoses may provide results equivalent to surgical DRIL procedures 1

Critical Distinction: Stenting vs. Embolization

The more common endovascular intervention for forearm/wrist fistula-related hand ischemia is distal radial artery embolization or ligation, NOT stenting. 1, 2

Distal Radial Artery Management

  • Coil embolization or surgical ligation of the radial artery distal to the anastomosis eliminates the steal phenomenon by preventing retrograde flow 1, 2
  • This approach showed 100% symptom improvement in endovascular coil embolization patients versus only 60% in surgical ligation patients 1
  • Recent data demonstrates 82% symptom improvement with distal radial artery ligation (DRAL) while maintaining access function 2
  • The 30-day complication risk is only 3.2% 2

Combined Endovascular Strategy

The optimal endovascular approach often combines:

  • Distal radial artery embolization (to stop steal) 1
  • PLUS angioplasty/stenting of any ulnar artery stenoses (to restore hand perfusion) 1, 3
  • This leverages the robust collateral circulation between radial and ulnar systems 4

Important Caveats and Pitfalls

Technical limitations exist:

  • Endovascular dilation is achievable in palmar arch arteries and distal forearm where surgical revascularization is routinely not possible 1
  • However, the small diameter of distal radial and palmar vessels, especially with calcific disease, makes intervention technically challenging 1

Avoid these errors:

  • Do not perform isolated procedures without complete arteriography—unrecognized proximal stenoses can cause access thrombosis post-intervention 1
  • Do not delay intervention in symptomatic patients—progression from mild symptoms to tissue necrosis can occur rapidly 1
  • Consider carpal tunnel syndrome in the differential diagnosis, as 7% of patients with suspected DASS actually have carpal tunnel as the culprit 2

Preservation Considerations

The radial artery should generally be preserved for future use as:

  • A potential coronary artery bypass graft conduit 1
  • Future vascular access for cardiac catheterization 1
  • The presence of a functional arteriovenous fistula is listed as a contraindication to using the radial artery for transradial access procedures 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Digital Finger Blood Supply: Radial vs Ulnar Dominance

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.