Screening and Management of Retinopathy
All patients with diabetes require systematic retinal screening and aggressive risk factor control to prevent vision-threatening complications, while retinal vein occlusion demands prompt anti-VEGF therapy for macular edema.
Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
Initial Screening Timing
- Type 1 diabetes: Perform dilated comprehensive eye examination within 3–5 years after diabetes onset 1
- Type 2 diabetes: Perform dilated comprehensive eye examination at the time of diagnosis 1
- All examinations must be conducted by an ophthalmologist or optometrist experienced in diagnosing diabetic retinopathy 1
Follow-Up Intervals
- Annual examinations are standard for patients with any degree of retinopathy 1
- Every 1–2 years may be appropriate after one or more normal exams in well-controlled type 2 diabetes 1
- More frequent examinations (potentially every 3–6 months) are required when retinopathy is progressing or sight-threatening 1
- In populations with well-controlled diabetes and normal baseline exams, 3-year intervals carry essentially no risk of missing significant disease 1
Special Populations
- Pregnancy in type 1 diabetes: Retinopathy may transiently worsen during pregnancy and 1 year postpartum, particularly with poor glycemic control at conception 1
- Laser photocoagulation can minimize vision loss risk during pregnancy 1
Risk Factor Modification for Diabetic Retinopathy
Glycemic Control (Highest Priority)
- Target HbA1c <7% using intensive diabetes management 1, 2
- Intensive glycemic control prevents and delays diabetic retinopathy onset in large prospective randomized trials 1
- Near-normoglycemia reduces retinopathy progression by approximately 33%; combined with optimal blood pressure and lipid control, risk reduction reaches 67% 2
- Caution: Avoid rapid HbA1c reductions when intensifying therapy, as sudden drops can precipitate early worsening of retinopathy 2
Blood Pressure Control
- Target BP <130/80 mmHg to reduce progression of both retinopathy and nephropathy 2
- Hypertension is an established risk factor for macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy 1
- ACE inhibitors or ARBs are preferred first-line agents, especially when albuminuria or retinopathy is present 2
- Systolic BP <120 mmHg provides no additional benefit over <130 mmHg for retinopathy progression 2
Lipid Management
- Dyslipidemia increases retinopathy risk and should be optimized 1, 2
- Fenofibrate may slow retinopathy progression in patients with very mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy 2
Aspirin Therapy
- Retinopathy is NOT a contraindication to aspirin for cardioprotection 1, 2
- Aspirin does not increase the risk of retinal hemorrhage 1, 2
Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy
Anti-VEGF Therapy (First-Line for Macular Edema and PDR)
- Intravitreal ranibizumab produces visual acuity outcomes non-inferior to panretinal laser at 2 years for proliferative diabetic retinopathy 1
- Ranibizumab was FDA-approved for diabetic retinopathy treatment in 2017 1
- Anti-VEGF therapy results in less peripheral visual field loss, fewer vitrectomy surgeries, and lower risk of diabetic macular edema compared to laser alone 1
- Drawback: Requires more frequent visits and treatments than panretinal laser 1
- For diabetic macular edema, administer anti-VEGF agents (ranibizumab 0.3 mg or aflibercept) monthly initially 3
Laser Photocoagulation
- Panretinal photocoagulation reduces severe vision loss from proliferative diabetic retinopathy from 15.9% to 6.4% 1
- Greatest benefit occurs in eyes with high-risk characteristics: disc neovascularization or vitreous hemorrhage with any retinal neovascularization 1
- Focal laser photocoagulation for clinically significant macular edema reduces doubling of visual angle from 20% to 8% at 2 years 1
- Laser remains indicated for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy and clinically significant macular edema 1, 3
- Scatter photocoagulation should not be delayed once eyes reach high-risk proliferative stage 1
Referral Thresholds
- Prompt ophthalmology referral for any macular edema, severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy, or any proliferative disease 1, 2
- Same-day referral for diabetic macular edema, severe NPDR, or PDR 3
Retinal Vein Occlusion Management
Classification and Prognosis
- Retinal vein occlusion is the second most common retinal vascular disorder after diabetic retinopathy 1
- Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and hemi-CRVO are associated with glaucoma and higher risk of anterior segment neovascularization and neovascular glaucoma 1
- Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) has a visible arteriovenous crossing where occlusion occurs and is more commonly associated with hypertension, diabetes, and lipid disorders 1
- More-distal occlusions with less ischemia have better prognosis than more-proximal occlusions 1
Treatment of Macular Edema in RVO
- Anti-VEGF agents are first-line therapy for macular edema complicating both CRVO and BRVO 1
- Anti-VEGFs are the safest treatment option for RVO-associated macular edema 1
- Intravitreal corticosteroids have demonstrated efficacy but carry risks of glaucoma and cataract formation 1
- Laser photocoagulation has a potential role in BRVO treatment 1
- Macular grid laser photocoagulation is effective for macular edema in BRVO patients with visual acuity ≤20/40 4
Systemic Risk Factor Management
- Optimize control of systemic hypertension, diabetes, serum lipids, and intraocular pressure 1
- Major risk factors include systemic hypertension, arteriosclerosis, and diabetes 1
- Communication with primary care provider is essential to coordinate care and manage systemic risk factors 1
- Routine testing for heritable thrombophilias is not recommended 4
Long-Term Outcomes
- Both CRVO and BRVO eyes experience significant visual improvement with anti-VEGF/dexamethasone treatments over 7-year follow-up 5
- Best obtainable improvement occurs at 12 months for CRVO and 24 months for BRVO 5
- CRVO eyes require mean of 10.7 intravitreal treatments; BRVO eyes require 9.8 injections over 7 years 5
- Ischemia is associated with significantly worse outcomes 5
Hypertensive Retinopathy
Blood Pressure Management
- Hypertensive emergency (BP >180/120 mmHg with visual symptoms) requires ICU admission 3
- Malignant hypertension (BP >200/120 mmHg with visual symptoms) requires immediate ICU care with IV labetalol or nicardipine 3
- Reduce mean arterial pressure by 20–25% during first hour, avoiding overly rapid drops that can cause ischemia 3
- For mild retinopathy without hemorrhages, target BP <140/90 mmHg 3
- For documented retinopathy, maintain long-term BP <130/80 mmHg 3
- Grade III/IV retinopathy with BP >200/120 mmHg mandates ICU admission and controlled MAP reduction 3
Evaluation and Referral
- Perform bilateral dilated fundoscopic examination urgently to detect retinal tears, detachment, or hypertensive retinopathy 3
- Hypertensive retinopathy Grade II carries odds ratio ≈4.2 for coronary artery disease and requires prompt referral for cardiovascular risk modification 3
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not delay ophthalmologic evaluation: Untreated macular hemorrhage or proliferative diabetic retinopathy can lead to rapid vision loss 3
- Do not discontinue aspirin in patients with retinopathy; it does not increase retinal hemorrhage risk 1, 3, 2
- Do not assume unilateral symptoms exclude bilateral disease: Hypertensive retinopathy is typically bilateral even if symptoms are initially unilateral 3
- Do not lower blood pressure excessively fast in hypertensive emergencies with retinopathy; target diastolic 100–110 mmHg over 24 hours to prevent ischemic injury 3
- Do not delay eye screening in type 2 diabetes: Initial dilated exam must be performed at diagnosis, not years later 2
- Do not use absence of retinopathy as screen for nephropathy: The two microvascular complications are linked but one does not reliably predict the other 2
Coordination with Nephropathy Screening
- When retinopathy is detected, intensify renal monitoring with more frequent eGFR and albuminuria assessments 2
- When nephropathy is detected, ensure at least annual dilated eye examinations, with increased frequency if renal function is rapidly declining 2
- Both complications share common risk factors (hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia) and respond similarly to intensive glycemic control 2