What is the preferred retreatment regimen for a hepatitis C patient who failed a prior NS5A‑containing direct‑acting antiviral, considering liver disease stage (including decompensated cirrhosis) and renal function?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 17, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Retreatment of Hepatitis C After NS5A-Containing DAA Failure

For patients who failed prior NS5A-containing direct-acting antiviral therapy, the preferred retreatment regimen is sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir for 12 weeks in those without cirrhosis or with compensated (Child-Pugh A) cirrhosis, achieving SVR rates >95%. 1, 2

Compensated Cirrhosis or No Cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A)

First-Line Retreatment (All Genotypes 1-6)

  • Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir for 12 weeks is the standard retreatment for any genotype after NS5A inhibitor failure. 1, 2
  • This triple combination achieved 96% SVR in a prospective Canadian registry of 128 DAA-experienced patients, including 44% with cirrhosis. 3
  • The regimen includes sofosbuvir (high barrier to resistance), velpatasvir (NS5A inhibitor), and voxilaprevir (NS3 protease inhibitor), targeting all three drug classes simultaneously. 1, 2

Alternative for Difficult-to-Cure Cases

  • Sofosbuvir + glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 12 weeks can be used in patients with predictors of lower response (advanced liver disease, multiple prior DAA courses, complex NS5A resistance patterns) after multidisciplinary review. 1, 2
  • Pibrentasvir has a higher barrier to resistance than other NS5A inhibitors, making this combination viable for complex resistance profiles. 1
  • A phase II trial showed 96% SVR (22/23 patients) with this regimen in patients who previously failed glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. 1, 2

Very Difficult-to-Cure Patients

For patients with NS5A resistance who failed ≥2 prior DAA regimens:

  • Either sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir OR sofosbuvir/glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 12 weeks. 1, 2
  • Add weight-based ribavirin (1,000 mg if <75 kg; 1,200 mg if ≥75 kg) OR extend treatment duration to 16-24 weeks. 1, 2
  • These modifications require expert multidisciplinary team decision-making considering liver disease severity, prior treatment history, and resistance profiles. 1

Sequential Failure After First-Line Triple Therapy

  • If sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir fails, retreat with sofosbuvir/glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 24 weeks plus weight-based ribavirin. 2
  • In the Canadian registry, patients who previously failed sofosbuvir/velpatasvir had lower SVR rates (88.5%) compared to those failing other regimens (99%). 3

Decompensated Cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B or C)

Critical Contraindication

  • Protease inhibitor-containing regimens (voxilaprevir, glecaprevir) are absolutely contraindicated in decompensated cirrhosis due to risk of hepatic decompensation and death. 1, 2

Recommended Regimen

  • Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 24 weeks plus weight-based ribavirin (1,000 mg if <75 kg; 1,200 mg if ≥75 kg). 2
  • This is the only safe option for decompensated patients, as it avoids protease inhibitors entirely. 2
  • Early retreatment before progression to decompensation is essential, as decompensated disease eliminates most therapeutic options. 1, 2

Genotype-Specific Considerations

Genotype 1 & 4

  • After NS5A inhibitor failure, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir for 12 weeks achieves >95% SVR. 1, 2
  • Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir alone (without sofosbuvir) is NOT recommended after NS5A failure—treatment failed in 7.3% of genotype 1a patients in randomized trials. 1, 4

Genotype 2

  • Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 24 weeks with ribavirin achieves approximately 91% SVR after prior DAA failure. 2

Genotype 3

  • Most challenging genotype, especially with cirrhosis and NS5A resistance. 1
  • Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 24 weeks with ribavirin achieves approximately 90% SVR in cirrhotic patients with baseline NS5A resistance. 2
  • Genotype 3b has particularly poor outcomes—only 70% SVR with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in clinical trials. 4

Genotypes 5 & 6

  • Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 24 weeks with ribavirin is recommended after NS5A inhibitor failure. 2

Resistance Testing and Management

Baseline Resistance Assessment

  • HCV resistance testing prior to retreatment is useful to guide therapy by predicting response probabilities according to the resistance profile. 1
  • All patients should be retreated in the context of a multidisciplinary team including experienced hepatologists and virologists. 1

Key Resistance Patterns

  • NS5A resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) persist indefinitely, whereas NS3 protease inhibitor RAS wane over months to ~2 years. 2
  • Common NS5A RAS include L31M/V/I and Y93H; double mutations may reduce SVR compared to single mutations. 2, 5
  • For genotype 3, the Y93H mutation is particularly problematic and should prompt addition of ribavirin. 1

Impact on Treatment Selection

  • Presence of NS5A RAS does not mean all drugs from the class are ineffective—pibrentasvir has higher barrier to resistance than ledipasvir or daclatasvir. 1, 2
  • Complex NS5A RAS patterns warrant consideration of sofosbuvir/glecaprevir/pibrentasvir over sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir. 1, 2

Renal Impairment Considerations

Severe Renal Impairment (CKD Stage 4-5)

  • Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir requires no dose adjustment in severe renal impairment, including hemodialysis patients. 4
  • In the EXPEDITION-4 trial, 98% SVR was achieved in 104 patients with CKD stages 4-5 (82% on hemodialysis). 4
  • Sofosbuvir-containing regimens can be used in CKD stage 4-5, though glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is preferred for treatment-naive patients. 4

Retreatment in Renal Impairment

  • For NS5A-experienced patients with severe renal impairment, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir remains the preferred option despite renal dysfunction. 2
  • Ribavirin dosing must be adjusted for creatinine clearance when added to retreatment regimens. 2

Treatment Duration and Ribavirin Use

Standard Duration

  • 12 weeks for patients without cirrhosis or with compensated (Child-Pugh A) cirrhosis receiving sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir. 1, 2
  • 24 weeks for decompensated cirrhosis receiving sofosbuvir/velpatasvir plus ribavirin. 2

Ribavirin Addition

  • Weight-based ribavirin dosing: 1,000 mg daily if <75 kg; 1,200 mg daily if ≥75 kg. 1, 2
  • Add ribavirin for: very difficult-to-cure patients, decompensated cirrhosis, or when extending treatment duration. 1, 2
  • When ribavirin is contraindicated, extend treatment duration to 24 weeks without ribavirin. 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do NOT Use Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Alone

  • Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir without sofosbuvir is NOT recommended for retreatment after NS5A inhibitor failure. 1, 4
  • SVR rates drop to 83-86% in genotype 1a patients with baseline NS3 + NS5A resistance. 1, 4
  • The combination must include sofosbuvir to overcome NS5A resistance. 1, 2

Do NOT Delay Retreatment in Cirrhotic Patients

  • Postponement can lead to decompensation, eliminating protease inhibitor options and leaving only sofosbuvir/velpatasvir with lower efficacy. 1, 2
  • Retreatment should be instituted as soon as possible after virologic failure. 1

Do NOT Use Protease Inhibitors in Decompensated Cirrhosis

  • Absolute contraindication due to risk of acute-on-chronic liver failure and death. 1, 2
  • This includes voxilaprevir and glecaprevir—only sofosbuvir/velpatasvir is safe. 2

Do NOT Retreat with Same Failed Regimen

  • Retreating with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir for 24 weeks after initial failure resulted in high frequency of failure predicted by NS5A RAS. 1
  • Always switch to a regimen containing drugs from different classes than the failed regimen. 1, 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.