How do I interpret a Bazett-corrected QT interval (QTcB) on a standard 12‑lead ECG?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 17, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

How to Interpret QTcB (Bazett-Corrected QT Interval)

Direct Answer

Do not rely on QTcB (Bazett's formula) as your primary method for QT interval interpretation—use linear regression-based correction formulas instead, and always visually validate any automated QTcB measurement before making clinical decisions. 1

Understanding QTcB and Its Fundamental Limitations

QTcB refers specifically to the QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula (QT ÷ √RR interval in seconds). 1 While this remains the most widely recognized correction method, it has critical mathematical flaws that compromise clinical accuracy:

  • Bazett's formula systematically overcorrects at heart rates >90 bpm and undercorrects at heart rates <50 bpm, leading to false-positive prolongation at high rates and missed prolongation at low rates. 2, 1
  • The formula retains a strong positive residual correlation with heart rate (r = 0.32), meaning the "corrected" value still varies inappropriately with heart rate. 1
  • The American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and Heart Rhythm Society issue a Class I guideline recommendation against using Bazett's formula—they explicitly recommend linear regression-based correction functions instead. 1

When QTcB Values Are Particularly Unreliable

Avoid interpreting QTcB in these specific clinical scenarios:

  • Heart rates >90 bpm: QTcB will artificially inflate the corrected value, potentially triggering unnecessary interventions. 2, 3 In one study, QTcB overestimated drug-induced QT changes by clinically significant margins at elevated heart rates. 3
  • Heart rates <50 bpm: QTcB will underestimate true QT prolongation, potentially missing dangerous prolongation. 2, 1
  • Atrial fibrillation with beat-to-beat variability: Bazett's formula shows the most imprecision in AF compared to other formulas. 4
  • Large RR interval variability: Rate correction should not be attempted when RR variability is substantial. 2, 1

Practical Approach When You Encounter QTcB

If you must work with a QTcB value (e.g., from an automated ECG report), follow this algorithm:

  1. Check the heart rate first: 2

    • If HR is 50-90 bpm, QTcB may be reasonably accurate
    • If HR <50 bpm: Consider having the patient perform mild aerobic activity to raise HR closer to 60 bpm before remeasuring 2
    • If HR >90 bpm: Allow additional resting time to lower HR before remeasuring 2
  2. Always visually validate the automated QTcB measurement: 1, 5

    • Measure the QT interval manually from the beginning of the QRS to the end of the T wave 2
    • Use the "tangent method": draw a tangent to the steepest downslope of the T wave where it intersects the baseline 2, 1
    • Measure in leads II, V5, or V6, using the longest value 1
  3. Apply appropriate normal values: 2, 1

    • Normal QTcB: ≤450 ms in men, ≤460 ms in women
    • High-risk threshold: ≥500 ms in either sex (associated with torsades de pointes risk) 1, 5
  4. Consider recalculating with a superior formula: 1, 6

    • Fridericia's formula (QT ÷ RR^1/3) performs better than Bazett's at extreme heart rates 1, 7
    • Linear regression formulas (Framingham, Hodges) eliminate heart-rate dependence entirely 1, 3
    • In one hospital study, switching from QTcB to Fridericia reduced false-positive prolonged QTc reports by 21% and reduced QTc >500 ms reports by 57%. 6

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never rely solely on computer-generated QTcB without visual confirmation—automated algorithms vary in accuracy and may include U waves or misidentify T-wave termination. 8, 1, 5
  • Do not use different leads for serial QTc measurements in the same patient—QT length varies across the 12 leads, making comparisons invalid. 1, 5
  • Do not include discrete U waves that arise after the T wave returns to baseline in your QT measurement. 1
  • Account for bundle branch block: If QRS >120 ms, subtract the increased QRS duration from the QT interval or measure the JT interval instead. 1, 5
  • Do not intermix correction formulas—Bazett-corrected values cannot be compared with Fridericia- or Framingham-corrected measurements. 8

Special Exception: Long QT Syndrome

In genetically confirmed LQTS type 1 and 2 patients, Bazett's formula remains the preferred method because it was used in the diagnostic and prognostic studies that established QTc thresholds for these populations. 9 In this specific context, Bazett's formula is the only method that eliminates the inverse QT-HR relationship in LQTS patients, and switching formulas would invalidate established diagnostic criteria. 9

Measurement Technique Details

When you must measure and interpret QTcB yourself:

  • Identify the end of the T wave using the tangent method on the steepest downslope, not the "tail" of the T wave. 2
  • If the T wave is notched, consider the end of the entire complex as the T-wave termination. 1
  • Ensure T-wave amplitude is ≥2 mm for reliable measurement. 5
  • Use the TP segment as your isoelectric baseline reference. 5
  • Measure from the earliest QRS onset to the latest T-wave end across all leads if performing global interval measurement—this will be 30-40 ms longer than single-lead measurements. 8

References

Guideline

QTc Interval Measurement and Clinical Significance

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

QTc Interval Calculation and Measurement

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Atrial fibrillation and QT corrected. What is the best formula to use?

European journal of clinical investigation, 2023

Guideline

QT Prolongation Measurement and Interpretation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Rate-corrected QT interval: techniques and limitations.

The American journal of cardiology, 1993

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

QT correction using Bazett's formula remains preferable in long QT syndrome type 1 and 2.

Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.