Thiazide-Type Diuretics as First-Line Therapy Based on ALLHAT
Based on the ALLHAT trial, thiazide-type diuretics (specifically chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg daily) should be the preferred first-line antihypertensive medication for adults with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk. 1
Primary Outcome Findings
The ALLHAT trial randomized 42,418 high-risk hypertensive patients aged ≥55 years to chlorthalidone, amlodipine, lisinopril, or doxazosin (stopped early). 1, 2
For the primary outcome of fatal coronary heart disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction, all drug classes performed equivalently:
- Amlodipine vs chlorthalidone: RR 0.98 (95% CI 0.90-1.07) 1, 2
- Lisinopril vs chlorthalidone: RR 0.99 (95% CI 0.91-1.08) 1, 2
- Doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: RR 1.03 (95% CI 0.90-1.17) 1
Critical Secondary Outcomes Favoring Thiazides
The superiority of chlorthalidone emerged in preventing major cardiovascular complications, which directly impact morbidity and mortality: 1
Heart Failure Prevention
Chlorthalidone demonstrated marked superiority in preventing heart failure, the most striking difference in ALLHAT:
- Doxazosin: RR 2.04 (95% CI 1.79-2.32) - doubling of heart failure risk 1, 3, 4
- Amlodipine: RR 1.38 (95% CI 1.25-1.52) 1, 2
- Lisinopril: RR 1.19 (95% CI 1.07-1.31) 1, 2
Independent validation confirmed these heart failure diagnoses with 71-84% agreement, and ejection fraction measurements showed 63-70% of patients had EF ≤40%. 3, 4
Stroke Prevention
Chlorthalidone reduced stroke risk compared to ACE inhibitors and alpha-blockers:
- Lisinopril: RR 1.15 (95% CI 1.02-1.30) - 15% increased stroke risk 1, 2
- Doxazosin: RR 1.15 (95% CI 1.01-1.40) 1
- Amlodipine: no significant difference 1
Combined Cardiovascular Disease
Chlorthalidone prevented more composite cardiovascular events:
Blood Pressure Control Differences
Chlorthalidone achieved superior blood pressure control, which partially explains outcome differences: 2
- Lisinopril: 2 mmHg higher systolic BP at 5 years (P<.001) 2
- Amlodipine: 0.8 mmHg higher systolic BP at 5 years (P=.03) 2
In Black patients, the blood pressure control differences were even more pronounced, contributing to worse outcomes with lisinopril. 1, 5
Treatment-Resistant Hypertension
Chlorthalidone-based therapy resulted in the lowest rates of treatment-resistant hypertension: 6
- Chlorthalidone: 9.6% developed treatment-resistant hypertension 6
- Amlodipine: 11.4% 6
- Lisinopril: 19.7% - double the rate of chlorthalidone 6
Contemporary Guideline Integration
The 2017 ACC/AHA systematic review incorporating ALLHAT and 40 other trials confirmed no mortality difference between drug classes but validated thiazide superiority for heart failure prevention. 1
Network meta-analysis comparing all classes to thiazides showed: 1
- All-cause mortality: no significant differences across classes 1
- Heart failure: ACEIs RR 1.2 (95% CrI 0.91-1.5), CCBs RR 0.97 (95% CrI 0.90-1.1) 1
- Beta-blockers showed 20% increased cardiovascular mortality vs thiazides (borderline significant) 1
Important Caveats and Exceptions
While thiazides should be first-line for most high-risk hypertensive patients, specific clinical scenarios warrant alternative initial therapy: 7, 5
When to Choose ACE Inhibitors/ARBs Instead:
- Patients with albuminuria or proteinuria (renoprotective effects) 7, 5
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction 7
- Post-myocardial infarction 7
When to Choose Calcium Channel Blockers Instead:
- Black patients (equivalent or superior outcomes to thiazides) 7, 5
- Patients on lithium therapy (avoid thiazide-lithium interaction) 8
- Isolated systolic hypertension in elderly 7
Absolute Contraindications:
- Alpha-blockers (doxazosin) should not be first-line due to doubled heart failure risk 1, 7
- ACE inhibitors/ARBs are contraindicated in pregnancy 7
Cost Considerations
Thiazide-type diuretics are substantially less expensive than newer agents, providing equivalent or superior outcomes at lower cost. 1, 2 This cost-effectiveness strengthened JNC VII recommendations favoring diuretics as first-line therapy. 1
Study Limitations to Consider
ALLHAT enrolled predominantly treated patients (90%) with baseline BP 146/84 mmHg, essentially studying treatment switching rather than true first-line therapy in untreated patients. 1 However, this reflects real-world clinical practice where most hypertensive patients are already on some therapy. 1
Event validation was performed on only 10% of CHD and stroke events, with 66% confirmation rate for heart failure in the validated subset. 1 Despite this limitation, independent validation studies confirmed the heart failure findings. 3, 4