Can a female patient with an implantable loop recorder undergo MRI?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 18, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

MRI Safety in Patients with Implantable Loop Recorders

Yes, a patient with an implantable loop recorder can safely undergo MRI, as modern loop recorders are MR-conditional devices that allow scanning when manufacturer protocols are followed. 1, 2

Device Classification and Safety Profile

Modern implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are classified as MR-conditional devices, meaning they can be safely scanned under specific conditions. 1, 2 This represents a significant shift from older guidance that considered all cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) contraindicated for MRI. 3

Key safety evidence:

  • Research on the Reveal Plus (Medtronic) ILR demonstrated that MRI scanning caused no harm to patients or permanent damage to the device across 11 scanning events involving cranial, lumbar-spine, shoulder, and knee MRI. 4
  • Post-MRI interrogation showed no diminished signal integrity, altered programmed parameters, diminished battery status, or inability to communicate or be reprogrammed. 4
  • Patients reported no sensations of tugging or warmth at the implant site during scanning. 4
  • The Confirm AF DM2102 (St. Jude Medical) is explicitly labeled as MR-conditional. 2

Critical Pre-Scan Requirements

Before proceeding with MRI, you must:

  • Verify the specific device model and confirm its MR-conditional status with the manufacturer. 1, 5
  • Interrogate and clear the ILR immediately before the scan to establish baseline function. 4
  • Verify signal integrity and time-date stamp accuracy pre-scan. 4
  • Consult with the ordering physician, patient's cardiologist, diagnostic radiologist, and device manufacturer when planning the MRI. 3

The British Heart Rhythm Society emphasizes that manufacturer guidance must be strictly adhered to for safe scanning of MR-conditional devices. 1

Important Artifact Considerations

A critical pitfall: ILR exposure to MRI commonly produces artifacts that mimic both bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias. 4 These artifacts must be recognized and excluded to avoid mistakenly attributing syncopal episodes or palpitations to false arrhythmias detected during the MRI period. 4

Post-scan protocol:

  • Reinterrogate the device immediately after MRI (or within 2 days maximum). 4
  • Review stored episodes carefully to distinguish true arrhythmias from MRI-induced artifacts. 4
  • Question the patient about any symptoms experienced during scanning. 4

Non-MR Conditional Devices

For older, non-MR conditional loop recorders, MRI may still be performed if no other imaging modality is suitable and there is a clear clinical indication that outweighs potential risk. 1 However, this requires careful risk-benefit analysis and enhanced monitoring protocols. 1, 5

Practical Workflow

The most restrictive MR safety condition of all implanted system components dictates the scanning approach. 6 Complete and accurate identification of all device components is essential, as there have been reports of serious device-related MR safety incidents. 6

The scanning facility must have:

  • Protocols for monitoring patients with CIEDs during MRI. 5
  • Contingency plans for inadvertent scanning of MRI-unsafe devices. 5
  • Capability for immediate device interrogation pre- and post-scan. 4

Modern ILRs represent a significant advancement in MR safety compared to the 2011 guidance stating "MRI is generally contraindicated in patients with CIEDs." 3 The evolution to MR-conditional devices has made diagnostic MRI accessible to this patient population when appropriate protocols are followed.

References

Research

[Implantable loop recorder of the Confirm family (St. Jude Medical)].

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2016

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Safe scanning, but frequent artifacts mimicking bradycardia and tachycardia during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with an implantable loop recorder (ILR).

Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2005

Research

MR Safety: Active Implanted Electronic Devices.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America, 2020

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.