What are the differences between Streptococcus viridans and Streptococcus salivarius in terms of clinical significance, laboratory identification, and recommended antimicrobial therapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 18, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Streptococcus viridans vs Streptococcus salivarius: Key Differences

Streptococcus salivarius is a specific species within the broader viridans group streptococci, not a separate entity—understanding this taxonomic relationship is essential for proper clinical management and laboratory identification. 1

Taxonomic Classification

  • Viridans group streptococci (VGS) is an umbrella term for α-hemolytic streptococci that includes multiple species: S. sanguis, S. oralis (mitis), S. salivarius, S. mutans, and the S. anginosus group (S. intermedius, anginosus, constellatus). 1

  • S. salivarius is one specific species within this viridans group, classified within the "Salivarius group" along with S. vestibularis and S. thermophilus. 2, 3

  • All viridans streptococci, including S. salivarius, are gram-positive cocci that produce α-hemolysis on blood agar, are optochin-resistant, and bile-insoluble (distinguishing them from S. pneumoniae). 3

Laboratory Identification Challenges

  • Conventional biochemical methods struggle to differentiate S. salivarius from other viridans species, requiring molecular techniques for precise identification. 2, 3

  • MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry provides rapid, reliable species-level identification of S. salivarius and other viridans streptococci with 100% consistency compared to genotypic methods. 4

  • The coaE gene sequencing method can precisely differentiate S. salivarius from closely related salivarius group members (S. vestibularis, S. thermophilus) when MALDI-TOF is unavailable. 2

  • Automated blood culture systems detect S. salivarius readily, and standard subculture media support growth (unlike nutritionally variant streptococci which require supplemented media). 5, 3

Clinical Significance

Endocarditis Risk

  • Both S. salivarius and other viridans streptococci cause 40-60% of community-acquired native valve endocarditis in non-IDU patients, with no clinically meaningful difference in pathogenicity between S. salivarius and other viridans species. 1, 6

  • S. salivarius follows the typical viridans pattern: subacute presentation, association with dental procedures, and predilection for previously normal valves. 6, 7

Rare Invasive Infections

  • S. salivarius can cause bacteremia and meningitis following gastrointestinal procedures, though this is uncommon and often initially dismissed as contamination. 7

  • Unlike the S. anginosus group (S. intermedius, anginosus, constellatus), S. salivarius does NOT have the characteristic abscess-forming tendency that would require prolonged therapy or systematic imaging for metastatic foci. 1

Antimicrobial Therapy

For Highly Penicillin-Susceptible Strains (MIC ≤0.12 μg/mL)

S. salivarius endocarditis is treated identically to other viridans streptococcal endocarditis—there is no species-specific modification required. 1

  • Preferred regimen: Penicillin G 12-18 million units/24h IV continuously or in 4-6 divided doses for 4 weeks (Class IA). 1

  • Alternative: Ceftriaxone 2g/24h IV/IM once daily for 4 weeks (Class IA). 1

  • Short-course option: Penicillin G or ceftriaxone PLUS gentamicin 3 mg/kg/24h for 2 weeks (Class IB), but NOT for patients with abscesses, creatinine clearance <20 mL/min, or 8th nerve dysfunction. 1

  • β-lactam allergy: Vancomycin 30 mg/kg/24h IV in 2 divided doses for 4 weeks (Class IB). 1

Resistance Considerations

  • Penicillin resistance among viridans streptococci (including S. salivarius) has increased to 13-50% in recent studies, with macrolide resistance reaching 22-58%. 1

  • MIC testing is mandatory to guide therapy selection, as treatment regimens are subdivided by penicillin MIC categories (≤0.12,0.12-0.5, >0.5 μg/mL). 1

  • Penicillin tolerance (MBC >> MIC) may occur but has no proven clinical significance and should not alter therapy selection. 1

Critical Clinical Pitfalls

  • Do not confuse S. salivarius with nutritionally variant streptococci (Abiotrophia, Granulicatella), which require enterococcal-type combination therapy for 6 weeks due to poor cure rates with standard viridans regimens. 5

  • Do not extend therapy duration for S. salivarius unless there are complications (abscesses, prosthetic valve)—unlike S. anginosus group infections which may require longer courses. 1

  • Blood culture positivity does not automatically indicate pathogenicity—S. salivarius bacteremia may represent transient bacteremia or contamination, requiring clinical correlation. 7

  • When S. salivarius is isolated, notify the laboratory if growth fails on subculture, as this would suggest misidentification and possible nutritionally variant streptococci requiring special media. 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.