Most Reliable GFR Formula
For routine clinical practice, use the 2021 race-free CKD-EPI creatinine equation as your initial GFR estimation method, and add cystatin C measurement (using the combined CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation) when precision is critical or creatinine-based estimates are unreliable. 1, 2
The Hierarchy of GFR Assessment Methods
Gold Standard: Measured GFR
Direct measurement using exogenous filtration markers (inulin, iohexol, iothalamate, 51Cr-EDTA) represents the most accurate GFR determination but is expensive, time-consuming, invasive, and only available in specialized centers. 3
Inulin clearance is considered the reference standard, though iohexol plasma clearance is emerging as the practical alternative with comparable accuracy and lower cost. 4, 5
These methods are reserved for situations requiring absolute precision: dosing nephrotoxic chemotherapy, extreme body composition abnormalities, or when estimated GFR is thought to be highly inaccurate. 1, 2
Best Practical Formula: Combined CKD-EPI Equation
The CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation outperforms either marker alone, correctly classifying GFR in 62% of cases versus 38% for creatinine alone and 45% for cystatin C alone. 1
This combined equation provides superior accuracy and precision across the entire GFR range, particularly when creatinine-based estimates are compromised. 1
Standard Initial Assessment: 2021 CKD-EPI Creatinine Equation
The 2021 race-free CKD-EPI creatinine equation should be your default starting point for GFR estimation in adults, as it performs better than MDRD especially at GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m². 1, 2
Clinical laboratories should automatically report eGFR alongside serum creatinine, rounded to the nearest whole number as mL/min/1.73 m². 3
When to Add Cystatin C Measurement
Add cystatin C in these specific clinical scenarios where creatinine accuracy is compromised: 1
- Extremes of muscle mass (sarcopenia, bodybuilders, amputees)
- Extremes of body size (severe obesity, cachexia)
- Dietary factors (vegetarian diet, creatine supplementation)
- Muscle wasting diseases (muscular dystrophy, chronic illness)
- Borderline eGFR values where clinical decisions hinge on precise classification
- Drug dosing decisions requiring high precision, especially nephrotoxic agents
Important Caveats About Cystatin C
Thyroid dysfunction, high inflammatory states, and exogenous steroid use can affect cystatin C levels independent of GFR. 1
Despite these limitations, the combined equation still outperforms creatinine alone in most clinical situations. 1
Why Older Methods Are Inadequate
Serum Creatinine Alone
Never use serum creatinine alone to assess kidney function—it is affected by muscle mass, age, sex, and diet independent of actual GFR. 3, 2
When serum creatinine significantly increases, GFR has already decreased by at least 40%. 3
Among patients with normal serum creatinine, 20-40% have asymptomatic renal insufficiency when measured by clearance methods. 3
Cockcroft-Gault Formula
The Cockcroft-Gault equation was derived from 249 hospitalized men (no women in the original dataset) and simply assumes a 15% reduction for females. 3
While historically common and still used for some drug dosing protocols, it has been superseded by more accurate equations. 3, 2
MDRD Equation
MDRD underestimates GFR in patients with normal renal function and is less accurate than CKD-EPI at GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m². 3, 1, 2
MDRD performs better only at GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m², but even in this range, the 2021 CKD-EPI equation is preferred. 3, 2
24-Hour Urine Creatinine Clearance
Prone to substantial inaccuracy due to incomplete urine collections and overestimates GFR because creatinine is secreted as well as filtered. 3
Consider only when measured GFR is unavailable and estimated GFR is thought to be highly inaccurate. 3
Practical Clinical Algorithm
Step 1: Obtain serum creatinine and calculate eGFR using the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine equation. 1, 2
Step 2: Assess whether clinical circumstances compromise creatinine accuracy (extremes of muscle mass, body size, dietary factors, muscle wasting, borderline values, or precision-dependent drug dosing). 1
Step 3: If creatinine accuracy is compromised, add cystatin C measurement on the same sample and calculate eGFR using the combined CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation. 3, 1
Step 4: If estimated GFR remains unreliable despite combined equation (extreme body composition, rapidly changing kidney function, dosing highly nephrotoxic drugs with narrow therapeutic windows), consider measured GFR using iohexol or another exogenous marker. 1, 2
Laboratory Standards for Accuracy
Creatinine assays should use enzymatic methods with calibration traceable to international standards, achieving coefficient of variation <2.3% and bias <3.7%. 3
Cystatin C assays should achieve coefficient of variation <2.0% and bias <3.2% compared with reference methodology. 3
Serum/plasma should be separated from red blood cells by centrifugation within 12 hours of venipuncture. 3