For an older female patient with heart‑failure with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 45%, NYHA class II‑III, recent HF hospitalization or elevated natriuretic peptides), how is sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) indicated, initiated, titrated, and monitored?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 18, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Entresto (Sacubitril/Valsartan) in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

Sacubitril/valsartan carries a Class 2b recommendation for HFpEF, meaning it "may be considered" in selected patients—specifically women and those with LVEF 45–57%—but it is NOT first-line therapy and did not meet its primary endpoint in the pivotal PARAGON-HF trial. 1, 2

Evidence Base and Guideline Recommendations

The 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guidelines assign sacubitril/valsartan a Class 2b recommendation (Level of Evidence: B-R) for HFpEF, which is substantially weaker than its Class I recommendation for HFrEF. 1, 2 This distinction is critical: in the PARAGON-HF trial of 4,822 patients with LVEF ≥45%, sacubitril/valsartan versus valsartan failed to achieve statistical significance for the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or total HF hospitalizations (rate ratio 0.87; 95% CI 0.75–1.01; p=0.06). 1

Subgroup Benefits That Drive the Indication

Despite the neutral overall result, two prespecified subgroups showed significant benefit that form the basis for selective use: 1, 2

  • Women: Rate ratio 0.73 (95% CI 0.59–0.90), driven primarily by reduction in HF hospitalizations 1, 2
  • LVEF 45–57% (below the trial median): Rate ratio 0.78 (95% CI 0.64–0.95) 1

There was no mortality benefit in the overall population (HR 0.97 for all-cause mortality, HR 0.95 for CV death). 1 The signal of benefit was entirely in HF hospitalizations (rate ratio 0.85; 95% CI 0.72–1.00; p=0.056). 1

Patient Selection Criteria

Eligibility thresholds for initiating sacubitril/valsartan in HFpEF include: 2

Criterion Threshold
LVEF ≥45% (preferably 45–57%)
NYHA class II–III
Natriuretic peptides Elevated (or HF hospitalization within 9 months)
eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m²
Serum potassium ≤5.2 mmol/L
Systolic BP ≥100 mm Hg (preferred)

Prioritize female patients and those with LVEF closer to 45–50%, as these subgroups derive the greatest benefit. 1, 2, 3 Sacubitril/valsartan should be considered after SGLT2 inhibitors (which have a stronger Class 2a recommendation for HFpEF) and in patients who remain symptomatic despite optimal management of comorbidities. 2, 3

Initiation and Dosing Algorithm

Switching from ACE Inhibitor or ARB

Mandatory 36-hour washout is required when transitioning from an ACE inhibitor to avoid angioedema (Class I recommendation, strong evidence). 4, 2 No washout is needed when switching from an ARB. 4

Starting dose: 4, 2

  • Standard patients: 49/51 mg twice daily (if previously on high-dose ACE inhibitor or ARB)
  • High-risk patients: 24/26 mg twice daily if:
    • Severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²)
    • Moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B)
    • Age ≥75 years
    • Systolic BP 100–110 mm Hg

Titration Schedule

Double the dose every 2–4 weeks as tolerated, targeting 97/103 mg twice daily for maximum benefit. 4, 2 This target dose was used in PARAGON-HF and provides the greatest reduction in HF hospitalizations. 4

Monitoring Parameters

Essential monitoring at baseline, 1–2 weeks after initiation, and with each dose increase: 4, 2

  • Blood pressure: Watch for symptomatic hypotension (most common adverse effect in older adults; pinteraction = 0.026 for age-related hypotension risk) 5
  • Renal function: Serum creatinine and eGFR (sacubitril/valsartan actually favored better renal outcomes than valsartan in PARAGON-HF) 1
  • Serum potassium: Particularly when combined with MRAs; hold if K⁺ >5.2 mmol/L 2
  • Volume status: Consider reducing diuretic dose in non-congested patients due to enhanced natriuresis 4, 2

Management of Adverse Effects

Hypotension (the most common barrier to titration): 4, 2

  • Asymptomatic hypotension is NOT a reason to withhold or reduce dose—benefits are maintained even with systolic BP <110 mm Hg 4, 2
  • Symptomatic hypotension: First reduce diuretic dose if patient is euvolemic; if persistent, temporarily reduce sacubitril/valsartan dose then re-titrate (40% of patients who required temporary dose reduction were successfully restored to target) 4

Hyperkalemia: 2

  • Mild elevation (<0.5 mg/dL creatinine increase) is acceptable and does not require dose adjustment 4
  • If K⁺ >5.5 mmol/L, hold dose and recheck; consider reducing or holding MRA if co-prescribed 2

Angioedema: 4, 2

  • Occurs more frequently than with ACE inhibitors alone
  • History of angioedema with prior ACE inhibitor/ARB is a precaution (not absolute contraindication) but requires careful counseling 4

Contraindications

Absolute contraindications: 4, 2

  • Concomitant ACE inhibitor use (requires 36-hour washout)
  • History of angioedema with sacubitril/valsartan
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C)

Treatment Algorithm for HFpEF

First-line disease-modifying therapy: SGLT2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin or empagliflozin) have a Class 2a recommendation and should be initiated first. 2, 3 They reduce the composite of worsening HF and CV death by 18–21% (DELIVER and EMPEROR-PRESERVED trials). 3

Second-line considerations for patients who remain symptomatic: 2, 3

  1. Spironolactone 12.5–25 mg daily (Class 2b) if LVEF 40–50%
  2. Sacubitril/valsartan (Class 2b) if female or LVEF 45–57%

Symptom management: Loop diuretics at the lowest effective dose for congestion. 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not treat HFpEF the same as HFrEF: Sacubitril/valsartan has a much weaker evidence base in HFpEF (Class 2b vs. Class I). 2, 3
  • Do not initiate sacubitril/valsartan before SGLT2 inhibitors in most HFpEF patients—SGLT2 inhibitors have stronger evidence and a Class 2a recommendation. 2, 3
  • Do not permanently discontinue for asymptomatic hypotension—temporary dose reduction with subsequent re-titration is preferred. 4
  • Do not overlook the 36-hour ACE inhibitor washout—this is a Class I safety requirement to prevent angioedema. 4, 2
  • Do not use in patients with LVEF >60%—there is no evidence of benefit in this population. 1, 2

Special Populations

Elderly patients (≥75 years): 5

  • Start with 24/26 mg twice daily
  • Higher risk of hypotension (pinteraction = 0.026) but treatment benefits are retained
  • Monitor BP closely during titration

Chronic kidney disease: 2

  • Requires eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m² for initiation
  • Sacubitril/valsartan showed better renal outcomes than valsartan in PARAGON-HF (lower incidence of composite renal decline) 1

Peritoneal dialysis patients: 6

  • Small observational study (n=21) showed safety and efficacy with 50–100 mg twice daily
  • NT-proBNP decreased significantly (p=0.002) with no adverse drug reactions
  • Consider in ESKD patients with HFpEF, though data are limited

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Treatment for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Role of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.